Yemeni Scud attack kills 66, destroys 17 F-15s, 9 Apaches
If Iranian news is believable…
That must have been one lucky hit if it did, given their track record for accuracy.
I know there’s been a few debates about whether the ASQ-239 does active EW, so here is the answer:
http://www.baesystems.com/en/product/an-asq-239-f-35-ew-countermeasure-system
Always active, AN/ASQ-239 provides all-aspect, broadband protection, allowing the F-35 to reach well-defended targets and suppress enemy radars. The system stands alone in its ability to operate in signal-dense environments, providing the aircraft with radio-frequency and infrared countermeasures, and rapid response capabilities.
Hope they bailed in time.
Yikes. Hopefully they bailed in time.
Surely all the instructions and labels would still be in Russian?
Quite frightening effects of thermobaric rockets fired from TOS-1A Buratino 220mm heavy launcher/flame thrower
Apparently it’s a Smerch:
http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2526615&postcount=13872
Better refresh your idea what Predators look like: http://www.ga-asi.com/predator-b
Predator A is what you describe. Predator B went to common tail with Reaper.
Predator B is a Reaper.
And many of the munition used are dumb bombs, which have huge legacy stockpiles. The planes would be flying anyway, so the only real cost is the munitions and logistics. It’s not like an Afghanistan/Iraq NATO deployment and rebuilding exercise.
Hermes 900?
First off all, JDAM can recive new targets inflight from the carrier aircraft. The italians and the isralies have IR homing noses that can be pluged into Mk series bombs, I belive the US is looking into this to add it to JDAM to give it moving target capability.
The main reason for the inefenctiveness of LGBs during Allied Force was the weather not the LGBs. Cloud cover was havy thruout Yugo and they will break up the lase, making designation dificult at best.
It was also damn difficult for special forces to lase ground targets from cover though dense woodland.
Only 10% of the German AF is ever operational, so I can’t see why issues that actually involve flying are even relevant to them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ducted_fan
A ducted fan is a propulsion arrangement whereby a mechanical fan, which is a type of propeller, is mounted within a cylindrical shroud or duct. The duct reduces losses in thrust from the tips of the props, and varying the cross-section of the duct allows the designer to advantageously affect the velocity and pressure of the airflow according to Bernoulli’s Principle. Ducted fan propulsion is used in aircraft, airships, airboats, hovercraft and fan packs.[1]
Ducted fans normally have more and shorter blades than propellers and thus can operate at higher rotational speeds.
I think my point was that the source was ridiculous. Russia has only committed a relatively small complement of aircraft in the region purely for taking on Syrian insurgents. The suggestion that they’re somehow going to try exert air superiority over Israel with 4 flankers is bat-**** crazy in itself, even without considering the other possible ramifications.
Scenario:
Lets say an air force, rather than buying specific type of aircraft for dedicated roles, wants to consolidate on one type to be used for multiple roles i.e. air policing, strike, maritime strike, etc (the way things are going). It prefers to use Flankers for whatever reason (think malaysia, Indonesia, Algeria, etc), which would you consolidate with?
Su-34
Su-35
Su-30SM/30MKI
Mig-29M (why the hell not, its becoming a flanker now)
I would cheat and say Su-50.
It would seem kind of stupid to issue such a threat without committing a lot more aircraft first. I mean that’s a pretty nasty 400+ fighter airforce to be taking on with 4 Su-30s and some ground attack aircraft.