Is that solid rock? A HE or fragmentation warhead wouldn’t leave a large crater then.
It would if it was incased in steel travelling at about 550mph. Also looks very soily underneath, note brown.
Sounds plausible. Plenty of Tomahawks ended up crashing or hitting wrong countries too. Though, 4 out of 26(?) sounds like a high failure rate, if true.
In Desert Storm, only 85% succeeded.
The only problem is the crater in 2nd source looks small for a detonation on impact as reported by first source and a crash alone without detonation wouldn’t damage windows at range. And where is the missile? These things are 6.2m long and 0.533m in diameter. That’s about the height of a telegraph pole and several times the width.


https://twitter.com/Conflicts/status/652185829620744192
Upstairs window is still intact.

The same thing is being reported in many outlets. Not just CNN. It sounds to me like a few of the cruise missiles launched yesterday may have malfunctioned.
Iranian outlets are also reporting it.
http://oyannews.com/%D8%AA%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%A8-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B2-%D8%AE%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AA-%D8%B4%DB%8C-%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B3/
Wow, a 450kg warhead broke some glass and left the rest of the building in tact. What were they using in the warhead, gunpowder?
One source reports blast but crater is only 1-2ft deep, so people of Twitter saying it didn’t detonate, just crashed, so why are the windows cracked?
Any truth? Sounds like CNN BS to me.
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/08/politics/russian-missiles-syria-landed-iran/index.html
First on CNN: U.S. officials say Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran
I wonder if ISIS will try tunneling under Russian positions. They’ve played that tactic against the Syrian Army, does Russia have any way of detecting that?
That’s just my half-assed guess as I couldn’t find any mention of the Vikhrs and the SM upgrades so I presumed that the Russians were not very satisfied with the Vikhrs on the Su-25T.
There seems to be a recurring notion of 4 targets attacked on one pass for the SM3, but they don’t specify the details like weapon and guidance type.
That does seem very Vikhr-M-like. So were the 8 production Su-25Ts retired?
Why are the intakes blocked?
Shame. I think that’s a loss in capability. I loved the Su-25T on DCS World and the Ka-50.
I guess Ugrozas haven’t been introduced yet either?
There are no Su-25Ts left in service.
If you want Vihr, you need the Ka-52. Unfortunately Kalashnikov and company have cocked up the Vihr order, so none are available yet (well, not en masse anyways), and they would realistically operate only with Ataka.
What about the Su-25SM?
I though Atakas were used by Mi-28 and Vikhr-M were used by Ka-50/52?
Remember that the Russians are hitting every faction in Syria and labelling them IS/ISIL/ISIS. How do you know that they are not just bouncing rubble in regards to IS fixed targets for effect? By now IS will have learned to put their high value command and control/HQs and other equipment into highly populated areas knowing that the strict rules of engagement and collateral damage risk will put them off the target list. Certainly the Russians are claiming that IS are moving equipment close to Mosques.
https://www.rt.com/news/317811-isis-moves-military-hardware/
Perfect situation to use a Vikhr-M from an Su-25T.
The topic is Syria; I don’t see anybody mentioning that it’s an invention of the current regime, just that it’s indiscriminately dropped over the cities out of their control for no other purpose than punishing the civilians which are supposed to be their own people. So, you’re saying that Saudi Air Force aims their PGM’s at civilian targets? Have any proof for such claims? I’m not debating their intervention, but there is a however slight difference between intentionally bombing the civilians and those who are hit as a collateral. Not that it matters to the victims, granted, but at least occurrences are less numerous and the numbers that die are much smaller.
Besides, barrel bombing was never the topic of the argument, but generalization of all rebel groups ideologically unacceptable to general Western public as being the same based on e.g. some individual example caught on video.
A recent news article stated that Saudi bombing in Yemen was responsible for more civilian deaths than the terrorism.
http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2015/10/01/444912621/u-s-backed-saudi-bombing-campaign-blamed-for-civilian-deaths-in-yemen
http://www.voanews.com/content/civilian-death-toll-in-yemen-wedding-attack-hits-130/2983833.html
the question should be: how come that after two years of bombing there are any fixed targets left?
Now that’s a good question.
From Caspian not Mediterranean. Must have flown over Iran and Iraq
Where’s the article BTW?
Duplicate post.
Russian MoD now says that they have launched 26 cruise missile strikes from their warships in the Mediterranean, against targets 1500km into Syria.
What kind of missiles would that be? Kalibr?
What kind of Syria would that be? It’s only 750km across at its widest point.