it flies with a giant moon on the underside. enemy forces will mistake this camouflage and think its a real moon. little will they know it is a lethal aircraft that will kill them.
Looks more like a bullseye to me.
And with that I hope you’ll allow me to do so 🙂
No problem. Thanks for an interesting exchange of views.
A lie huh ? I know what a reservation is for and why they were created . Do you ? What version of history you’ve been taught over there.
You said that “all of their land was taken away”. Since reservations are semi-autonomous entities belonging to the various Indian groups, it would seem your words are false.
You also said that “…indians were almost exterminated…by the “white folks”…”.
This is hyperbole of the worst kind and represents a perfect example of why these forum “discussions” are so unproductive.
The story of the indigenous native population in the Americas is a sad one for many reasons…but it’s also one that routinely gets highjacked for peoples’ partisan political agendas. You land squarely within that group.
I don’t think that comparison is completely valid, as Germany and Japan had stable, functional governments at the time…
I’m just trying to follow your reasoning here.
Your basis for not criticizing Lebanon and the Palestinians was that these entities were dysfunctional and therefore any attempt to reason with them was not likely to have much success.
The same was true of Hitler’s Germany and Tojo’s Japan. I doubt that you or anyone else would try to argue that reasoning was going to get anywhere with these two since history has more than shown that to be false.
Who represents the Palestinians, who actually wields real power to enforce decisions on their side?
We know those answers…the PLO, headed up by Mahmoud Abbas and the PA. How much “real power” each holds is debatable.
What seems fairly certain, however, is that these two organizations seem relatively immune from criticism…few give it, and seldom is it ever well received.
If your point is that a forum discussion has no chance of influencing real events, and that therefore my arguments go out of the window, I would have to accept that though.
C’mon, now…I never said that. I think I have shown that I am more than willing to listen to your points. Some I agree with. and some I don’t. When I don’t, I try to present a rational reason why, as I have tried to do here.
I generally stay away from political forum debates on any topic for that reason.
With regard to your first point about these debates not influencing real events, I wholeheartedly agree. I believe it to be equally true that such discussions have a near-zero chance of influencing any poster.
For that reason, I try to only address the basis of an argument and leave the merits of it for another day. If a poster wants to make a point, he should be capable of doing this without resorting to hyperbole, factual distortion, or unsubstantiated claims. These I think are fair game…the actual politics of the matter, not so much.
Third, the fact that the indians were almost exterminated and all their land taken away last century by the “white folks”…
That’s not a fact….it’s a lie. Do you know what an Indian reservation is?
Finally i will say again what i said before regarding the pro-israeli folks : Criticism is one of the things hardest to accept for a human being, unfortunately.
Coming from this poster in light of his previous posts, this rates a perfect 10 on the irony scale.
Instead, the Palestinians and Lebanon are the real issues today, in my view. However, what use is it to criticise them? …Also, the societies and political systems of both these entities are hopelessly dysfunctional, so it seems futile in the extreme to expect any results whatsoever from criticising them.
Israeli detractors aren’t trying to fix things…they are trying to assign blame…and they only point fingers in one direction.
Your point seems to be that critics of the situation can really only expect that situation to improve when criticizing Israel. It would make interesting dinner conversation to extend that argument to a discussion of WW2 where war critics only dog the Allies on the basis that doing so to Germany and Japan would not improve the chances of peace.
Disagreement with Israeli policy has nothing to do with antisemitism. You might not like foreign policy of France or Germany, does that make you anti-Christian or white-race-hater?
I’d like to believe that…but I have just one little question.
It seems that those who often use this argument (some might see it as a defense) are seldom seen criticizing anyone but the Israelis. Surely there must be some other bad actors in this world to be critical of…so, where is the criticism?
In the absence of equal criticism…and there is an absence as this thread has more than shown…then the question of why such a singular focus isn’t that farfetched.
You ever thought about facing them in battle (I suppose the relations turned sour before you retired)
Not really. I’ve wondered how many of them avoided being stood up along a wall and then shot by Khomeini’s fanatics.
Once upon a time as a USAF pilot training instructor, I spent a fair amount of time with Iranian AF students. Nice guys and were typical of students in general…some good, some average, and some not so much.
I’ve often wondered what ever happened to them.
To sum up the middle east issue shows, how Europeans and their cousins across the Atlantic create problems and then shifts the blame, now Germany is Israel’s best buddy while the Arabs & Muslims who offered them support during the tragedy of the 40s their sworn enemies.
Regarding that support, here is an interesting link:
http://www.projetaladin.org/holocaust/en/muslims-and-jews/the-holocaust-and-muslims.html
Does the poster believe that the Israeli citizens living in Israel who just happen to be Arab or Muslim are “sworn enemies”?
Where and when did Israel classify “Arabs and Muslims” as “sworn enemies”?
So…if Arabs and Muslims are “sworn enemies” as this posters alleges, then what about the info here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_citizens_of_Israel#Legal_and_political_status
The plight of the palestinians, which seems to the the topic that gets lots hot under the collar, is actually more the responsibility of the Arab countries surrounding Israel that attacked the fledgling state in 1948 than any responsibility of the Israeli state.
Israeli defensiveness is a product of that unprovoked attack in 1948; this provoked the aggression that Israeli desire to defend their people often manifests as.
Good post…but something tells me that you aren’t going to get very far with it here.
Wasn’t the US invasion of Iraq an unilateral action
No, it wasn’t.
Before you say things like this, just how hard is it to Google the question?
They did. 😉
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel
In my opinion a balanced view about that.
There are a number of interesting things to wonder about in that article!
EDIT: A thought came to mind…
Msphere…in the event that you check out Sens’ link, please…under no circumstances should you post the picture of that bomb.
It is NOT an Israeli bomb!!
🙂
Nice try.. going back to the only point you got.. getting desperate?
Sorry…did you want me to help you out with what ‘populism’ means?
If Vanunu’s level of technical competence could not convince them that he had in fact worked in an Israeli facility on the components he photographed, who could say the pictures were really taken in Israel?
It does raise an intriguing question!
Something not mentioned yet…I wonder how much judicial action was taken against Vanunu just to have him be an object lesson to anyone contemplating similar actions?
Or was this only punishment for revealing what was already a relatively well known fact?
It’s a funny world sometimes…it may be that these disclosures were actually to Israel’s liking, inasmuch a credible threat is only one if the enemy believes it exists.