dark light

Seaking93

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 286 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hunter FGA.9 flying today NW Bedford #1130216
    Seaking93
    Participant

    It was one of the F58’s out of Yeovilton, c/s Navy 71, I believe it was ZZ191

    in reply to: The Pacific miniseries #1147950
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Watched the first episode on HBO last night and must agree with the previous posts, felt very much like BoB even down to the veterans talking heads at the start, a bit of a slow start but will no doubt improve as the story unfolds, sadly will be back in the UK next Sunday so will have to wait for it to appear on UK screens

    in reply to: Fred Ballam And The Westland Archive #1109561
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Apologies all: 1200, Yeivil Crematorium, Monday 21st December
    No Flowers, Donations will be divided between;
    Dorset and Somerset Air Ambulance and
    St Margaret’s Hospice, Yeovil.

    Judwin, many thanks for the information

    in reply to: Fred Ballam And The Westland Archive #1109620
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Judwin, which day is the funeral?

    in reply to: John Fairey dies in Piston Provost crash, 9/7/09 #1185450
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Knew John from his visits to FAAM where the Flycatcher is now housed, a real gentleman and another of the old school gone for ever,

    RIP John

    in reply to: Navy in Greenwich #1182099
    Seaking93
    Participant

    For those that might be interested there is a celebration for 100 years of Navy Flying in Greenwich this weekend.

    Currently being assembled outside the Old Navy Colleg are the following:

    Sea Harrier ZD607
    Sea King HC4 XV700
    Lynx ZD254
    Gazelle XZ305

    All arrived by low loader this morning and are due to be removed on Monday

    I understand that there are further details on the Royal Navy website and that their will be some flying diplay

    More details here http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/operations-and-support/fleet-air-arm/fly-navy-100/news/naval-aviation-comes-to-the-capital

    Sorry no pictures as I only have my work mobile which is useless

    Just a small point Sea King XV700 is a Mk6CR not a HC4, thanks for the information

    in reply to: Sea Vixen Flying today #1187621
    Seaking93
    Participant

    The Sea Vixen departed Yeovilton this morning after carrying out a full practice display, it was due to RTB at BIA and then later to take part in a flypast with the 2 currently based Hawks at Yeovilton who had relocated to BIA

    in reply to: Admirals Barge Shar for sale #1188723
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Any idea of the price yet? How complete is it?

    Last time I saw it there were lots of items missing

    in reply to: Yeovilton Casualty 1942. #1193036
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Kev

    Fulmar I N4079 of 761 NAS Yeovilton collided with Fulmar II N4008 (also 761 NAS) over Lulsgate Bottom airfield (now, of course, Bristol International) on 15 October 1942. Both crashed 2 miles East of Cheddar at the top of the Gorge; 18 year old Temp Midshipman (A) Godfrey Terrington Slater RNVR killed in N4079, whilst Sub Lieutenant R Starkey managed to bale out of N4008.

    Slater, son of Louis and Doris Slater of Matlock, Derbyshire, is buried in Plot 1, Row 12, Grave 13 of Matlock (St.Giles) Churchyard, Derbyshire.

    What else were you looking for?

    HTH

    Lee

    Lee

    Thats interesting, the other publication(Somerset at War) I checked first gives a different name(S/Lt Shorte) for that incident, all the other details such as a/c serials are the same

    in reply to: Yeovilton Casualty 1942. #1193234
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Kev, 2 Fulmars collided that day with one fatality, but not Mid(A) G.T. Slater, I will make some more enquires when I go into work tomorrow and get back to you

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1235527
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Previous posters have detailed the increase in RAFM staffing and that despite this, “lack of staff” is held up as the reason for the long term closure of many exhibits.

    By way of comparison, I dropped into the Fleet Air Arm Museum yesterday.

    It’s not cheap to get in (£10.50 each) and it’s in the middle of reorganising for a new display. Nevertheless the displays were interesting, you could walk right around the exhibits – even touch them! They clearly entertained a lot of children without serious problems. It was dark in the carrier exhibition but this is understandable given the rather dated graphics used. It didn’t seem any darker than the BoB Hall to be honest…

    With respect to staff I saw:

    2 people in the shop
    1 person preparing an aircraft for the new exhibition
    1 person at the entrance to part of the carrier exhibit (justifiable H&S – it’s a lift!)
    1 member of staff walking around (with a serving RN officer).

    All seemed knowledgeable, friendly and to enjoy being in the place.
    It felt like reasonable value for money.

    It’s a complex museum, lots of nooks & crannies – but they don’t seem to need the numbers of staff on the ground that the RAFM do.

    Presumably they rely on CCTV and it’s acceptable. Does anybody here fancy giving the FAAM’s view?

    Ask yourself, if it was YOUR business, how many people would you want to staff the RAFM – the numbers seem very high to me – anybody any idea how they break down? Exactly how many staff do the RAFM need to open all the exhibits – how big is the gap?

    Yes CCTV is used at FAAM however you only actually saw a fraction of the staff yesterday, there were approx 38 on duty accross all the depts, thats including all the backroom staff.

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1160935
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Beautifully thanks! Apart from Cosford, but I guess because it is RAFM.

    One of the few things I really don’t mind paying for are museums, feels worthy somehow.
    It should be pointed out that once you have paid for a Yeovilton entry, you can return free at any time for the duration of the rest of the year, so get your first annual in now, and don’t loose the ticket!

    I have been told that where Cosford is concerned free entry was a condition of grants from local councils, the European Union etc to enable Cold War and other work to be undertaken.
    Yes gift aid at FAAM is great value, provided you are a UK tax payer, pay one entry fee, gift aid it and get one years free admission, about 5 special event days are however excluded.

    in reply to: RAFM, faded glory ? #1160956
    Seaking93
    Participant

    The situation with the ‘National Museums’ is that there are 6 ‘National Military Museums’, that are sponsored by the MOD not DCMS,

    The National Army Museum
    The RAFM
    The Submarine Museum
    The Royal Marines Museum
    The Royal Navy Museum
    The FAAM

    The 4 naval museums are now being brought under one umbrella organisation called the National Museum of the Royal Navy.

    On the free entry question, the National Army Museum used to be the only one with free entry, when the DCMS museums went free the RAFM visitor numbers suffered, the director(Dr Fopp) went to the MOD and asked and got extra grant in aid to enable the RAFM to go free and compete.

    When the naval museums followed suit and asked they were turned down as it was felt that the RAFM was competing with a lot of large museums within the M25, they were not so they have remained fee paying to this day.

    Hope that explains why FAAM has to charge

    in reply to: Royal Navy Historic Flight Yeovilton #1187914
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Can any one help with this question

    I am trying to find out where the Royal Navy Historic Flight collection is kept at RNAS Yeovilton.

    WHY?

    in reply to: Supermarine Attackers in Pakistan. #1209208
    Seaking93
    Participant

    Just came up with this..

    The Attackers last service career was with the Pakistan Air Force. After protracted negotiations 36 Attackers were sold to Pakistan, 33 were ferried out by Supermarine pilots, and the other 3 were flown out by Pakistan Air Force pilots as an exercise, the flying time to Karachi averaging 11 hr and 40 mins.

    But.. i have also read that they were in fact registered to the Pakistan Navy.:confused:

    I knew one of the pilots who ferried the aircraft out to Pakistan, he was in fact a Royal Navy pilot on leave, he told me that several of his friends also flew aircraft out, sadly he is no longer with us but his name lives on on the side of the Attacker at FAAM

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 286 total)