dark light

VIRAGE

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 66 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050406
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Sounds good on paper as on paper a sub is much harder to track and defeat than a strategic airbase, but unless the Russians drastically change their habits of having most of their SSBNs in or near dock then it would be cheaper to use existing bombers than build new subs to carry extra warheads…

    Surely you understand that even if the Russian subs stay in the proximity of their ports, they’re still much harder to find and take out than bombers.

    Not only you know exactly where the bombers are, but you would also have plenty of time to kill them, because they would have to travel far to deliver their payload (ALCM’s included).

    Strategic bombers are history but for special-ops missions like taking out a bunker or a carrier (and even for those a submarine is almost always a better option).

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050458
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    800 for the Fleet , 1,100 for the SRF and 300 for the Aviation will be a good number to look forward at post 2012

    This indeed looks like a good split, although I would rather see 1000/1100/100 (Sea/Land/Air).
    This is because ALCM’s would only be needed against carrier battle groups + some exotic contingencies, and 100 w/h for that would be enough.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050504
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Hmmm? Surely you know that they began new production of a new R-29RM variant, called “Sineva”, a few years ago? The Delta IVs are being re-equipped with the modernized missile as they go through overhaul, they’re not going to be disposed of anytime soon.

    This is news to me, thanks. Last time I heard the -29RM was frozen or cancelled. If your info is true, I stand corrected re:667’s. And the -29 is a great missile, with a better payload/mass ratio than even the D5.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050532
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    It just means they can have their eggs in more baskets. If they can carry 6 warheads in each that is 6 x 12 x 5 warheads in 2015 or 360 warheads. If they were like Ohios and had 24 in each that would be 6 x 24 x 5 or 720 warheads. If the limit is 2000 warheads and the ICBMs and air launched missiles and sub launched missiles are of equal number then they can only carry 666 SLBMs, 668 ICBMs and say 666 air launched cruise missiles then you wouldn’t be allowed 5 Boreys with 24 missiles. With maybe two Typhoons with Bulavas that is 2 x 20 x 6, plus by 2015 5 x Boreys that is 240 + 360 = 600. That leaves 60-70 warheads short, which could be made up with one or two Delta IVs.

    IF they put w/h on ALCM this would be extremely dumb!!
    A much better distribution of w/h would be a roughly even split between SLBM and ICBM. And for this you would need a bigger missile battery on the Borei.

    Besides, 941’s long-term future is all but certain. One will be re-armed, that’s all we know. The 667BRDM will be soon disposed of, because the ampulized liquid fuel on their R-29’s will soon need replacement, and there may no longer be a production capability to do that.

    All in all, a 16-missile load would be optimal for the Borei, but 12 is too low.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2050548
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    If true, Borei’s abysmally low weapon count (12) is definitely cause for concern..

    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Start buying books. At least read some news. If you want to stay within your protecting shell of (…), then at least don’t bother us with your 12-year old view of the world.

    Russian economy is as powerful as that of the Netherlands. And the best thing: Different to former times all powerful Russians are “for sale” nowadays. Just the prices went up since the early 90s.
    Maybe you noticed the severe drop in life expectancy in Russia (men are now as low as 65, in the same range as classical development countries). Large parts of the Russian population live in poverty, the wealth is shared by only a few. The whole society is far away from being in a state of sustained development. The better cash-flow can’t change the facts: Russia is a country that started from zero (economical, political and social) need will need some more time.

    And so my conclusion: There are many things in need in Russia, some are even military (maybe some “special” forces that don’t kill hundreds of people in each action). At least they need to stabilize the thing called “Russian Federation”. A 5th generation fighter is the worst investment they could do.

    Don’t always believe what you read in newspapers. You might come through as brainwashed. I regularly visit Russia and the improvements are dramatic. And yes, people LOVE Putin and the direction he’s taking to strengthen the state, the economy and defense. So do your homework before speaking with aplomb.

    Let Liberman and McCain spew lies about Russia, people in the know know better.

    VIRAGE
    Participant

    sferrin, it’s unfair to make any extrapolations based on the last 15 years. Russian 5th gen effort has been largely stalled in the ’90’s due to economic reasons. To put it in familiar terms, imagine the Great Depression that lasted a decade plus loss of territory. No wonder the deadlines missed, promises broken, specs changed.

    Now the situation is different. Funds are available, factories are largely in no danger of being closed or converted, the doom mentality in people’s minds is going away. Still crisis, but the trends are better than those in the last 10-15 years.

    Having said that, I remain sceptical on two accounts.

    First, the ability of Sukhoi to deliver a middle-weight fighter. They’ve always specialized on tactical strike a/c, and as a result, they have only developed one truly great fighter (the Su-27 line) and it was after great delays and a major redesign. And it’s a heavy fighter.
    I have more faith in the Mig.

    Second, the 5-th gen engine. Russian engine bureaus suffered even more than the figher houses during the infamous ‘perestroika’. So a lot of people are gone, and experience is lost.

    VIRAGE
    Participant

    One more reason for my British friends to hate TonyB…

    When is he quitting already?!

    in reply to: Why don't Chinese or Russians copy YF-23? Attempt II #2597054
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    USAF didn’t pick YF-23 a decade ago, what makes you think RusAF would do it now?!

    Many tactical and operational principles changed since then anyhow. UCAV’s and smaller (<20-ton) manned a/c make more sense to operate.

    I think the posed question is silly, with all due respect. I ignored it in the first thread, but here I see it resurface.

    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Ukraine’s Yulia Timoshenko is a b$tch, albeit a very pretty one… She can eat a man alive and then spit the bones into the gutter.

    Real Berlusconi’s two daughers are more appealing to me (if it is indeed them in the picture “Berlusconi” posted above)

    in reply to: Norway continues participation in the F-35 project #2571958
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    There is no such thing as “Euros” if you ask me.
    At least i would not want to be called an “Euro” 😉

    Herein lies the problem. When you STOP being offended when called a Euro, Europe can become one country and can become competitive. Then it would have a chance to compete with the US, and a pretty good one too. The US is increasingly becoming a country of illiterate immigrants, so you guys have a pretty good chance… all you have to do is to stick together and buy your own products… so it wouldn’t be even a question what fighters to buy for Norway or Holland… you’d just buy European fightes as needed.

    in reply to: Mexican Navy is looking for jetfigthers #2584159
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    According to April 27 reports in the Russian news media, Mexico plans to acquire Su-27s… I haven’t seen any English links, but a couple of Russian:

    http://www.avia.ru/news/?id=1146136451
    http://lenta.ru/news/2006/04/27/mexica/

    Deputy Mexican Navy chief Moreno said they plan to deploy the fighters at Campeche (sp?) to protect oil fields.

    The Flanker reportedly has beaten the Gripen and other (unnamed) fighters to get the offer. Russian authorities decline to confirm the upcoming deal, noting only that they’ve had some extensive negotiations with the Mexicans.

    in reply to: F-22 jammed canopy #2586742
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    The pilot should have flown his sortie while he waited for the ground crew to figure out what they wanted to do.

    If it is indeed the case that the ejection sequence depends on jettisoning the canopy, flying a sortie would be incredibly dumb. There’d be no way to bail out if needed,

    in reply to: F-22 jammed canopy #2587312
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Hmm… what’s the ejection sequence on the Raptor? Probably shooting straight through the glass without jettisoning the canopy?

    in reply to: F-15 upgrade program #2588436
    VIRAGE
    Participant

    Gentlemen, allow me to remind you that we are all aviation enthusiasts here. Let’s set the politics aside.

    I have opened this thread to mainly share what I am finding to be a disappointing development for me as an aviation lover. As such I want to see better newer hardware replacing older less capable one. (An exception: Super Whorenet replacing Tomcat 😡 )

    The USAF falling back onto the F-15 program instead of moving to replace them with a F-22 fleet is as disappointing to me as endless Su-27 upgrades and redressing as a “4++…” generation a/c..

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 66 total)