Will the M2 have improved TWR?
http://www.nal.res.in/pages/pdf/dr04.pdf
This is the director’s report current till March of 04 only but quite insightful, there is mention of SARAS and the LCA itself. Again I am proud that the world’s biggest democracy is also the world’s most open democracy. ๐
The 8 LSPs come in 2 years from now.
HAL will probably replace one squadron per year once production starts.
i believe the IAF have asked for a mid-term quality check of the LCA. i hope it dosen’t turn out to be another ARJUN like project. :dev2:
:rolleyes:
You mean the tank that is entering service? God the noseum continues it seems.
Question
In the LCA testing phase, it seems like the PV1 is chucking all the flights away, the TD-1 for example ahs not really done as much, why is that? Is the TD-1 going through an upgrade at the moment?
Looks like the Indian sky will have f-16s flying unchallenged afterall. ๐
Rememebr a certain segment of the world pop have been living in the dream world where the IAF cant fly its planes and are but dumb GCI controlled robots, hence such news that has been trickling down over the last year from the French to now Singapore AF, such news seems to contradict the more comfortable belief of IAF inferiority.
I have no idea what Kashmir and Bangladesh are doing on this topic but a quick google search will reveal why the people of former East Pakistan left and who those so called rebels were lol.
As far as Kashmir comments, one wonders how 700,000 Indian soldiers, roughly 75% of the army is in Kashmir, man the propaganda smoke must be big on your side. And these few rebels that u talk about are well armed and sometime love blowing themselves up and kill both soldiers and KASHMIRI civilians, I being an ethnic kashmiri find the comments of “a few rebels disgusting” on a completely UNRELATED thread!
Stick to F-16s, dont bring dumb unrelated comments in here.
Could some memebrs refrain from hijacking the thread with references to other topics please.
I am also wondering what wizzard came up with the theory that Jordanian Amrams if puchased will not be able to hit any plane from any country.
The frequency of test flights will probably be lower this month and the next due to the holiday season in India aka Diwali etc.
harry
Just one question from the lecture notes u took.
Don’t u mean superior handling characteristics to the M2000 and not m2000-5 while I do not doubt that both m2000 and 000-5 are similar, no IAF pilot has flown on m2000-5s yet unless some pilots have been to France already to test out the 05 for the 126 proposed deal?
Optimal strategy for the IN would probably be to have its two carriers in close proximity to each other s as to maximize cap numbers in the air, IAF su-30s will lend support as a squadron is planned to be assigned to the task, the advantage will still be with the IN but it seems that an optimal PAF strategy would be to launch a massive attack on the fleet in the early days of the war when the PAF is at its peak strength wise, since the war will be short, any sinking will result in paf fan posting articles for decades to come, chill though, this is but a dream for now. ๐
The promised strike is no saturation attack, if it is the first strike on a fully ready and aremd carrier group. Then there are not enough missiles to have a high chance of breaking through the defences imho.
Imho a first strike for the carrier would be not wise for the PAF. They have only a limited number of aircraft they can use to fire the AIM-39s and so those are very valuable. The Indian carrier group has two major weaknesses that a prudent commander could exploit. They have few fighters for the CAPs and the ships have a limited number of reloads for the missiles. And time is on the side the PAF. So before employing my strikers I would try to to get a good fix on the position of the strike force. While using P-3s and Atlanics with fighter cover.
the next step is to pressure the CAPs with faint attacks. Lure them out with F-7. Forcing the CAPs to act increases the pressure on the maintance section and on the pilots. And if they are stupid enough to come out of their AEW cover to engage my fighters os be it. Even if I would only achieve a 1:1 kill ration Iยดm winning.
Next thing usefull would be air launched decoys. If I could fire drones at teh strike force that would look like a medium alltitude strike on the enemies radars. So I would sent drones and F-7 with their radar on. The F-7 would be ordered to turn back before coming in range of SAMs. I would force them to commit their CAP again. I would force the AA defense ships to turn on their radars and if Iยดm lucky fighters and ships will waste missiles killing decoys. Just when the IN fighters return to refuel from their hunt for the decoys I would sent in a low level Mirage strike against the outmost AAW picket. Say 4 planes with 2 missiles each. That should give me a high chance of at least a mission kill.
Now the IN commander is forced to redeploy his forces. He will have to weaken his defenses on the south side of the group, to replace the damaged ship on the north side. Now my maritime patrol aircraft come into play. they have enough range to attack from the south side.
So my next attack would be a mdeium alltitude attack using Mirages with F-7 escorts that are flying the same speeds and headings like the drones I used before. Now the IN commander has a decision to make. Another fake raid again, or not. If he commits his CAP on the incomming strike the F-7 engage the CAP, while the Mirages attack another exposed escort.
In the confusion I would sent the P-3s in to attack from the south. Their orders would be to play it save. That means hitting an escort would be enough.
With a second escort damaged the IN carrier group becomes vulnerable. It becomes vulnerbale to airborne, surface and submarine attack. So the next strike I would use all Mirages for a strike on the carrier.
Again I would start with decoys. this time I believe they would not go for them. Then I would want a flight of F-7s using chaff bombs to create a screen for the enemy commander. If possible I would like some stand-off jamming as well.
Then another F-7 flight is sent just inside SAM range but turns north and low when engaged. Meanwhile I would try a highspeed low level attack with the Mirages using a weak point in the defenses. And then launch all I have at the center off the strike group. I would hope that the AAW ships have depleted their SAM stocks enough to be unable to engage all incomimng missiles.The funny thing on this discussion is, that both sides have an equal chance to win. The side that screws up the first time will most liekley lose, as both are limited in their resources.
Interesting but the IAF does plan to have asquadron of MKis helping out the carrier group at all times which would make the “tirering” of the CAPS of the carriers theory ambiguious.
The Navy chief says to wait till Monday for more details so let us wait and see.
Why can’t they fit the same J-10 multimode radar on the FC-1?