I can’t see the numbers, I only see someone looking to data snoop.

There was a certain lad who claimed that errors in certain articles make the whole damn thing loose credibility, well claims too do the same thing, the source for the LCA nose dimension and volume will be required before one can say “the nose is too small”
Arthur gave some numbers, a source will be welcome.

It is not just about dia of Antenna but Volume and weight also counts. LCA seems

does not have any space. ZHUK-M is 250KG radar.

SEEMS
PLEASE provide your measument method and standard error variable. 😀

3 years after first flight, the LCA is about to enter weapons trials later this year, that is not bad, we have already provided proof, actually Yahoo, that the LCA programe really started in 88-89 and funds were temporarily frozen in the 91 balance of payments crisis due to IMF obligations. The so called small nose that certain memebrs seem to have secret dimesions of is big enough to carry a Zhuk M radar, and op gear, yet this escapes certain individuals constantly, I can see the same garbage being rementione in a few weeks. Just like he J-10, the LCA still uses a proven American engine for which contracts have been signed, for the initial 40-50 aircraft anyway. The LCA will have all the nifty avionics you would expect, even an EF-2000 style voice command system, digital displays etc, the LCA itself is doing very well as per Atre, the ADA chief, but then again what does he know. 🙂
It is the Kaveri that should be discussed, there arguments can more easily be made, engine mastering is a long process but it just needs to be done even if they cant get it upto advertised specs.

I do not buy the dated argument, the LCA is not facing the F-22 but the FC-1 and the J-10, the J-10 will have similar ranged missiles, it will be a 4th gen fighter aka. Quad FBW isnot dated, neither will the avionics on the plane, as stated n number of times the MKI uses a lot of LCA components which will be furthur upgradd for the LCA itself. The LCA will not be able to compete with any 5th gen fighter but it will be able to handle 4th gen fighters, full stop.

Believe it or not, Yahoo over here has just solved a complex issue and deserves the 1M dollar Nobel prize

Here is his great theory
If you can go on the net or make up linkless articles, whichever you prefer or both, about a certain issue and post more negative articles than +ive ones, you proove that the idea is garbage

This can be applid to all fighter planes too

Dind 10 negative articles on the F022 and 2 +ive ones, then claim that the F-22 is a failure, same logic to the Ef-2000 and Rafale
Thanks Yahoo. 🙂

If GAURAV C SAWANT says it it must be true, the LCA is a success if I can post more +ive articles and a failure if I can post _articles. 🙂

A nobel winning logic