Arthur
lad

the LCA fselage, thanks Yahoo, has a chubby fuselage, as can be seen, hence more fuel, that is just plain obvious just by looking, sorry but ifyou can make the same conclusions about LCA nose dimensions just by looking, I can make so many more as well.

😀 Yahoo thanks for the pics, it surely prooves that the Mk2 is better, nice work. 🙂 🙂 😀

Yep an AM-39, I do not know if the black nudge is a RWR, bad vision, what RWR is this anyway.

Balance of payment should not effect this project in any way as it is Indigenous.

There is such a thing as IMF bail out package and in order to get this you must follow certain steps, aka cuts in defence spending etc etc etc 🙂

I like you Yahoo, u are cool. 😀

Both the J-10 and the LCA are using foreign engines!!!!! both these engines are proven!!!!!!!!

The Kaveri and ws-10 are not but will eventually come around!

seahawk u are confusing all of us.

And it is you Arthur who is still stuck up on bringing down the LCA, there are obvious articles posted by a certain Yahoo 🙂 that clearly show when the LCA project started, one must learn to come here with an open mind and not live with false concepts, you wanted proof, a troll gave it to you.

Wolverine
please do not bring the F-22 into this, certain trolls might think that we are comparing the LCA to the F-22, the F-22 is a fifth gen figher without any equal, period.

by the same lgic the J-10 too is a failure since it still uses a Russian engine, what kind of logic is that seahawk, the Kaveri will come when it comes, it has been facing problems but this year good news came about, the MMR is aparently ready and will be tested on the PV2 later this year, seahawk, did u know that a certain small European fighter took 10 yrs from first flight to enter service, the LCA is still doing fine, had you known about monsoon season in india you would realize that flight testing cannot be performed at the same frequency as in say December, have u ever lived though a monsoon, its not your average storm. There also seems to be a certain lac of knowledge around here but certain folks keep on farting the same nonsense, NO THE LCA NOSE IS NOT SMALL, IT IS ROUGHLY THE SAME SIZE AS THAT OF THE M2000 AND CAN ACCOMODATE A ZHUK M SIZED RADAR, get it right at least, the body is chubbier than the M2000, if the 2000 could become the 20005 xx then…..
As far as the aerodynamics, LCA performance has been judged to be better than the 2000Hs that the IAF currently flys by the test pilots, I do not know if they have tested it vs MiG-29s etc but I can say at least for the M2000, yes.