dark light

crobato

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,939 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2562356
    crobato
    Participant

    PL-12 appears operational but limited to the J-10 and J-8F units (or J-8Ds converted to J-8F standards). The J-8F pictured earlier in the thread appears to have a pylon long enough to hold one.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2564086
    crobato
    Participant

    These are beautiful planes. I hate to see them go. I hate Q-5s, J-8s and J-7s go too, obsolete yes, but in a way, all beautiful to look at with lots of character.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2564594
    crobato
    Participant

    And what’s Your opinion on the J-8 posted in post #935 …. Huitong’s page has just been updated as a possible J-8IIR:

    Cheers, Deino 😀

    I won’t call it a new recon version just because you added a pod. Just because a J-8H or J-8F can multirole with a recon pod does not necessarily make it a new version.

    Xinhui called the J-8IIs on the magazine cover as J-8Fs. I don’t think so. These planes still have the single wing fences but do have the tails of the J-8D. These planes are J-8D airframes with the new grey paint jobs, but we don’t know if there are any modifications done to their systems that might bring them up to the J-8F level of capability, like using the PL-12, updated radar, cockpit and other avionics.

    The photos of the J-8As are also new. It does show that the type, while old, is still in service and in remarkably good condition. This is surprising considering the type had many problems early in its career. Whatever they did, the J-8A has been honed into a robust and reliable plane apparently.

    A change in paint job might suggest that the J-8II has been modified internally. I noticed that operational fighters in the PLAAF don’t just get a paint job for the sake of it. In fact, many old fighters are clean but still in their original white color, as you can see with the J-8As. In order to save money, all upgrades, major maintenance work, overhauls, parts replacement, repainting are all done in one time and in one package. The J-8IIs in the cover appear to have gone into the shop recently and came out spanking new.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2565014
    crobato
    Participant

    1. UAVs, including converted J-7 and J-5.

    2. Q5Ds

    2. J8A

    4. J8IIs on a Chinese aviation mag

    Very nice pics of late production J-8Ds from the 9th Division. J-8IIs built as J-8Ds from the start do not have the green on the tail edge extend to the top, not to be confused with J-8Bs upgraded to J-8D standards by adding a refueling probe.

    in reply to: F-10 compared to EF and Rafale? #2568388
    crobato
    Participant

    Offboresight is not as important as flare resistance. Does the R-73 use a cryogenically cooled multi element, multi-spectral seeker? I don’t know. I heard reports that the R-73 is easy to decoy but that may be early production. Products do improve batch by batch, as improvements are incorporated into later production. In June 2006, there is said to be an upgrade that will be made available to existing R-73 users.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2569147
    crobato
    Participant

    It’s not obvious at first glance but I got excited when I looked deeper into this picture.

    This J-8 belongs to the 1st Regiment of the 1st Division PLAAF, currently the only known regiment to use the J-8F variant. The wings have the double wing fences first seen in the J-8H variant and likely to have been passed to the J-8F. There appears to be a missile under the wings which I believe is a nonfunctional training missile without forward canards. There are very few J-8F pics around, and none is as clear as this.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2576907
    crobato
    Participant

    Two brothers in arms …. 😉

    Interesting to see. You can see the tail of the J-10 is a lot smoother, no rivets, appears to be made from fewer pieces. I guess this is from composite construction.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2585403
    crobato
    Participant

    I’m surprised that nobody has commented on it before? The remains of the beam can be seen in the attachment. The link was posted on this thread.

    At first I thought this was part of a wing, but on second examination, this indeed appears to be part of the balance beam array.

    The rusty color beneath the aluminum is typical color for a ferrite element based phase array. The attachments is visible and the shape below is squared. It would also be the right size and shape.

    in reply to: Fun With Google Earth #2587397
    crobato
    Participant

    Google Earth just completed a serious update of their data. There is a TON of new high-resolution imagery in there. I’ve already seen the Kuznetsov, Varyag, Minsk, J-10s, Dingxin, a KJ-2000, the Y-8 Balance Beam, more S-300P sites…..looks like I found how I’m going to waste this weekend 😀

    I found an AWACS along with KC-135s and P-3s in OKinawa, Kadena AFB. You can see a bunch of F-18s and a B-1B in Anderson AFB, Guam.

    If you check Dalian where the Varyag is, you will also find the DDG 115 and 116 destroyers where you can see the S-300 silos on the ships. Two in the front, and four in the back.

    In Wuhu, Anhui, China, you will see the Su-30MKKs and a bunch of J-7s.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2587627
    crobato
    Participant

    The Flankers there seem to be missing front ends. :confused:

    Something to do with the way it scanned. It appears the satellite managed scan the Flankers right at the border of its camera but didn’t get the entire plane. When the satellite makes another pass over the same site, the Flankers were gone. But the fact there is Flankers there—no doubt J-11s—is interesting because this is the type of place you might expect them to be testing J-11Bs.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2587755
    crobato
    Participant

    I take It this is the plane you are refering to Crobato…

    http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/7131/tu154m0lc.jpg

    Wasn’t this plane rumoured to be some sort of battlefield survailence aircraft in the same mould as the E-8 JSTARS?

    It is not a JSTARs type of aircraft, more like ELINT, a spy plane, meant to intercept and read signals from radar stations, ships, or other aircraft like AEW aircraft of other countries. Yes. I think it may be used to survey and track the KJ AWACS, gathering data, monitoring its datalinks and signals. I kind of think that these planes—filled with technicians—are used to follow and monitor the AWACS.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2587762
    crobato
    Participant

    Gentlemen, may I refer you to this:

    http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showthreaded.php/Cat/0/Number/439465/an/0/page/0/gonew/1#UNREAD

    Here’s a preview:

    These coordinates appear to put the balance beam and the KJ-2000 north and west, in the region of Lanzhou MR responsibility. Probably with CFTC for testing. That’s like towards the Silk Road region. Note the arid dryness of the surroundings. This is quite far from the crash site.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2589977
    crobato
    Participant

    Hmm, I just remembered something.

    The crash site is not far from Wuhu AFB in Anhui province. Actually quite near. I wonder how many people here have good recollection of the Su-30MKK and J-10 photos that had all sort of armaments displayed on the floor, R-77s, Kh-59s, KABs on the like. Wuhu is the base where the 3rd Division is located, and it has an Su-30MKK regiment along with a J-10 regiment on the making.

    Take a look at this pic of the 3rd Division Su-30MKK which is probably taken in Wuhu. Not the plane itself. The other plane on the back.

    That is a Tu-154, and it is a spy plane disguised as a civil airliner. This plane as it appears on this picture, is in Wuhu, Anhui

    in reply to: MiG 19 & Shenyang F-6 #2590677
    crobato
    Participant

    MiG-19 is one of my favorites. Simple, and a powerful gun. However, romance aside, people that are experts on this have commented on low airframe life and/or other engineering quarks of which I forget.

    The airframe itself has a long life and is quite rugged. The engines however, have a short life but is cheap to replace. You can call them the first disposable jet engines. It is cheaper to replace the engines with brand new ones than to overhaul the used ones. Engine access is not easy, you have to pull the entire tail assembly off.

    The plane is also tough on maintenance. There are other things there that required being replaced often such as the hydraulic lines. However for the J-6, and particularly among the later versions, the Chinese have literally re-engineered every piece of the plane to make it bullet proof.

    Unlike the MiG-17/J-5, the MiG-19/J-6 is tricky to fly. It is said to seperate the men from the boys. But it does have tremendous performance once you have mastered the plane, the TWR is even better than the MiG-21.

    The cockpit is low and tight, despite offering better visibility over the spined back MiG-21s. In effect it is like sitting in a bathtub.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2591187
    crobato
    Participant

    If its an IL-76 crash, then it’s an IL-76 crash, not a Y-8 crash.

    I honestly do not know why there are 40 people. That’s a little too much for even an AEW plane. The equipment would have filled the plane and you have less seats on the plane.

    I am starting to think this is just a plain Y-8 transport carrying military personnel that is off duty, technicians, eingineers and their families. I think these are related to the Y-8 AEW program itself, but the plane that crashed isn’t the Y-8 AEW itself, but ironically, just a plain Y-8 carrying said personnel related to the AEW project.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,921 through 1,935 (of 3,939 total)