Re80
You’re wasting your time there CD. Orion? – a Thatcherite he ain’t.
A recent study by criminologist Mark Littler of Manchester University, involved 1200 young people being asked whether they had ever behaved dishonestly or committed any form of crime or, behaved improperly in any way ranging from faking a sick day from work or, failing to pay their fare on public transport to committing serious crimes such as vandalism, assault or burglary.
This group were also asked whether they attended a place of religious worship such as a church, synagogue or mosque and if so, how often. The study found a clear and unequivocal relationship between regular attendance at a place of worship and a lower likelihood of committing offences.
Although I now regard myself as a religious agnostic, I was educated at faith schools and brought up in a religious household. I believe that this background gave me three values; a conscience and an awareness of others needs before my own and a clear sense of the distinction between right and wrong.
That is what my religious upbringing did for me.
Re 295
Your definition of a sociopath is wrong.
Axel,
Others have their opinion as do I. I believe in the power of prayer as I do in the power of hope. Outside of medical science, that is, sometimes, all that we have. When extreme desperation comes in one door, prayer and hope come in thru another.
We can, all of us, atheist and agnostic, pray to an un-named source for help for the life and well being of a sick person. What harm can it do ?
Charlie,
We live in a ‘sick society’. That is because we live in a moral vacuum. The signs are all around you and unmistakeable. We can’t pass on moral values because the generation entrusted with the job themselves do not know.
Religion – and I do not want to be set up as an apologist – up until recent times, has been constant in its advocacy of a set of moral principles by which it was intended that men conduct their lives. We have ignored and are ignoring those principles. If, for example, Christianity continues to abdicate its moral responsibilities, then that moral vacuum to which I’ve referred will be filled by evangelising Islam.
Re 316
ZRX61
Yet again, you are wrong. Empathy played no part. It was religion that was required. It was required because I wasn’t born with an understanding and an appreciation of the three values mentioned. Because of the unique circumstances into which I and millions of others was born – the pre-occupations of WW2 – our parents and our teachers had no time and maybe less inclination to instill moral values and concepts.
And there you have the answer to the central problems affecting society in the early 21st century. There you have the answer to crime, disaffection, selfishness, greed, loneliness and all the many disatisfactions that accompany the way we live our lives.
Separate the God/mystic part of religion from the part that espouses the three values mentioned and others besides, and you have a workable code of practice; a code for living one’s life with some degree of reasonable harmony. Who, to-day, will teach that? Not parents. They, themselves, do not know. Teachers ? They are generally incompetent to teach even basic numeracy and literacy so what chance the ‘three values’ ? As for teaching morality and its nuances? – huh!
So, religion has to be the weapon of last resort. That is a ‘weapon’ with damp powder and no ammunition pre-occupied as it is with ‘women’s rights, ‘women bishops’, ‘homosexual promotion and equality’ and full to the brim with commentators of every rank within the Church advertising their opinions on every subject under the sun apart from those which are the proper concern of the Church; pastoral care and moral example.
So gentlemen, before you unthinkingly rubbish religion, pause a moment. It isn’t just about Heaven and Hell and Purgatory and other practices and ideas which to-day have a flavour of un-acceptability, it is about a moral code; a set of standards and values by which we live our lives and without which, the quality of life at best, is diminished and at worst is intolerable.
Re 335
Are you by chance, related to Bruggen 130 ?
My oxometer is in the red zone.
The subject of this series of programs is too serious to be the butt of jokes and light hearted banter. This matter strikes at the heart of the civic well being of this Nation. We have to turn it around or the risk of continuing the slide into the anonymity and disgrace of membership of the Third World becomes all too real.
My impression, gained from having actually watched this repulsive documentary, is that although there are suggestions of the possible abuse of the benefits system, what horrifies me and I would guess most viewers, is the sheer un-necessary squalor, filth and degradation that these people live in. Is this necessary?
If there aren’t any jobs, then, there aren’t any jobs – that’s it ! So, some benefit pay is due, so as to to keep body and soul together. Why then, does it, or at least some of it, have to go on booze and fags? Why can’t at least some of the residents start clearing the detritus of the street? At least making an attempt, to make their environment habitable and as pleasant as circumstances permit?
Yes, they are poor. Yes, they have little reason to get up in the morning. My sympathy and the sympathy of millions of others would be much more apparent if the residents of Benefit St. appeared more willing to help themselves. But of course they won’t. They won’t because they are incapable of thinking that way. They are what the Americans refer to as ‘trailer trash’.
I am grateful to Ch 4 for broadcasting this documentary. It is unpleasant and unpalatable but almost compulsive viewing in that it reveals what is meant by the term ‘broken society’ in Britain to-day. This documentary could be made only as a consequence of a complete breakdown and loss of the most elementary notion of the standards and values that once we taught the world.
When I look at this I am ashamed to be English.
Re 109
I don’t think that anyone who knows of you thru the medium of these Forums, would agree with your self description of you having lost your dignity, self respect and pride. Neither could most of us ever imagine that you live in the kind of undisguised squalor which is such a feature of these programs.
CD (re 110) has it just about right. Even adjusting our perspective for the program makers hyperbole, the fact remains that the ‘stars’ of Benefits St. appear to be living a life of feckless criminality that perhaps has always been around, but now seems to be gaining extra ground and currency, and all without the continuous and vocal public condemnation that at one time past might have been their lot.
Re 106
Deluded.
Re 115
There may be a lack of accuracy about just who is benefiting by what, when and how. There is no lack of accuracy about the self declared criminality of some of the stars of this show. There is no lack of accuracy when it comes to a very graphic description of the sheer dirt, degradation and squalor of the area inhabited by these same stars who, seemingly lack the awareness and the responsibility to do something about the pig sty they inhabit.
Do you believe that if the economy recovers to the point that jobs suitable for these people become plentiful that there would be a significant uptake? – I don’t.
They are at present, able to subsist perhaps with some difficulty – should it be fags and booze this week or, can I eat properly ? I believe that they are now ‘conditioned’ to live in this manner and until the payment of benefits are linked to some form of civic work of benefit to society, nothing will change.
We all can wring our hands and mouth platitudes till the cows come home. It will mean nothing to those most affected. They do need help – real help, not meaningless soundbites.
Re 125
CD.
Your comment should be compulsory reading for all the liberal handwringers. It makes a point most effectively.
Re 7
frankvw
Well, it’s certainly good to know what our masters think of us. I’ll do my best to live up to expectations.
Re 10
CD
With rare exceptions, a constant thread throughout the record of British military history – civil wars apart – is the attempt to do more with less.