Similar in fundamental effort to the Panton’s Lancaster (plus a potential re-spar!), and operating costs similar to a 737. I wouldn’t have thought that any company would sponsor an aircraft associated with war, as the Vulcan people are finding out. I think you can count Red Bull out…
In which case, it comes back to what I was saying to you yesterday… Invite the CAA surveyor for tea and biscuits, and have a chat BEFORE lobbing in an application. Get the correct gen regarding the CAA’s stance on whether the DA would be better off persuing the NDT programme or, as I suspect the replacement of parts. See if there is an avenue…
Bruce, I don’t think that anyone has assumed otherwise. I was always under the assumption that major work (spar caps, minimum) would be required to get one in the air. Of course, the term ‘life-expired’ relates to certain major components, which can be replaced.
I have a question though….
Given that The Shackleton Association (or similar) are the Design Authority, and therefore have final say as to whether a component is life-expired and needs replacing, why are BAe reputedly blocking attempts to fly? They have no authority or interest….
Nevermind the canopy… what’s Charlie Brown going to say when someone glues him to his seat?….
As a parent, it was my choice to have children (well, not exactly, but thats a story for another forum). It is also my choice to take them on a flight, and my choice to keep the little beggers quiet when on said flight.
It is YOUR lifestyle choice to fly in cattle class. If you want a quiet flight, away from the commoners (those rotten people who have chosen to keep the human race going for another 70 years), then fly business… or even better, since you frown on those people who have to fly in commercial aircraft with children in tow (because its just as cheap to fly to Spain or America than it is to drive to Devon and stay in a hotel), why don’t you CHOOSE to charter your own aircraft. You should be able to afford it since you don’t have the financial headaches of children..
Why is there a big deal about children being allowed on PUBLIC transport? I agree that in some cases, the parents can be alot more proactive in keeping their children quiet, but in the majority of complainers on here, it appears that their very presence is an irritation. I vote for a ban on snooty old whingers flying on commercial aircraft, along with drunks, anyone with odour problems, anyone with bowel problems, and anyone with a beard.
I have just created a new art installation which symbolises the modernistic perception of how the damage inflicted by global warming affects even the smallest populus centre. I am hoping to sell this social concept artwork for vast sums to someone who wears sandles.
If I don’t create the media frenzy which will make me feel like a god, then you are free to collect the knackered old fridge from from the village green where it was pushed out the back of a Transit van late last night.
I bet mine will last longer than that geezer’s engines once the scrap-stealing pikeys learn how to read…..
I have just created a new art installation which symbolises the modernistic perception of how the damage inflicted by global warming affects even the smallest populus centre. I am hoping to sell this social concept artwork for vast sums to someone who wears sandles.
If I don’t create the media frenzy which will make me feel like a god, then you are free to collect the knackered old fridge from from the village green where it was pushed out the back of a Transit van late last night.
I bet mine will last longer than that geezer’s engines once the scrap-stealing pikeys learn how to read…..
For the numbers of employees per square metre, its useless – as are all airports. The majority of the land is devoid of work space….
For general numbers of employees – its great. Thousands of jobs in a single location – as are all airports
For location – it’s the capital’s primary airport, so naturally it has a vast catchment area covering a couple of million potential employees – but how many are capable of working in a high security area?
Remember that Aviation is a global business, and the majority of employees are NOT from this country.
The retail employment opprtunities are the same as any large shopping mall – employment is transient depending on many things including rental rates for floor space. Generally, retail opportunities are limited – particularly beyond custom control.
Extra runways do not directly correlate to employment gains (once built) – more passengers may not require large amounts of new staff.
Any building development is good for employment within the construction industry, but how far can Heathrow expand? Probably not much. Being from the forgotten North, I don’t give a monkey’s about the exact nature of the extra runway arguement, but a better bet would be to build a new airport entirely. I like Boris’s island airport idea rather than extending a fairly old airport.
There is a creche in the aircraft….. it’s at the front behind that armoured door……
Until I read the news report. I was wondering just how big this two year old was, and whether she was, in fact, some kind of flesh eating monster!… In my experience (2 of), two year olds are quite small and easy to strap into seats. Whilst children of that age can be utterly unconsolable in so far as once the tantrum starts, not even sweets or other treats can shut them up. In this case I would say that the captain’s decision was unjustified – the child was strapped in and posed no danger to the aircraft.
In my view, it is the parents who should rightly be forced to learn how to control their kids (without violence) or deal with the consequences. Mine managed an 11 hour flight without a problem – colouring books, and an inexhaustable supply of patience and crisps works wonders, and again in this case the parents were winning.
This is the first time I’ve read the Victor Blog…. I distinctly remember this: http://victorxl231.blogspot.com/2012/02/mayhem-on-a1.html
A quality day…. Breakfast was at ‘RAF’ South Mimms…. The ‘gawping at the police’ was not quite as described… we in the back of the landy were actually pressed against the glass- utterly inconspicuous, honest guv. Happy days and sadly missed.
This is the first time I’ve read the Victor Blog…. I distinctly remember this: http://victorxl231.blogspot.com/2012/02/mayhem-on-a1.html
A quality day…. Breakfast was at ‘RAF’ South Mimms…. The ‘gawping at the police’ was not quite as described… we in the back of the landy were actually pressed against the glass- utterly inconspicuous, honest guv. Happy days and sadly missed.
I may have misread it slightly, but wasn’t this thread initially talking about the managers of museums, ie. those in power, and NOT the volunteers? We know that the majority of volunteers will bend over backwards to help the public, and a few are there for the social aspects rather than getting mucky with bits of old engine.
The managers on the other hand seem to be, in the majority, ‘miserable beggars’. Naturally there are a few (some of whom are known to post on here) who have nothing but good words to say and who have a perpetual smile on their face. The rest are negatively affected by the pressures of operating a volunteer organisation. Some are on a quest for power and see the museums as their empires – always a set up for a fall. Some have no people skills, but are supreme businessmen, some are owners of collections which have got out of hand, some simply dislike the volunteers who have weaseled their way to high positions within the museum and are unable to get rid of them.
We all have bad days, and these ‘miserable beggars’ usually have more on their plate than we realise. Some are just naturally miserable though.
I think the majority of museums have decent staff within them, and hopefully the museums who have utter ***** in charge will last long enough to see a change in management.
I may have misread it slightly, but wasn’t this thread initially talking about the managers of museums, ie. those in power, and NOT the volunteers? We know that the majority of volunteers will bend over backwards to help the public, and a few are there for the social aspects rather than getting mucky with bits of old engine.
The managers on the other hand seem to be, in the majority, ‘miserable beggars’. Naturally there are a few (some of whom are known to post on here) who have nothing but good words to say and who have a perpetual smile on their face. The rest are negatively affected by the pressures of operating a volunteer organisation. Some are on a quest for power and see the museums as their empires – always a set up for a fall. Some have no people skills, but are supreme businessmen, some are owners of collections which have got out of hand, some simply dislike the volunteers who have weaseled their way to high positions within the museum and are unable to get rid of them.
We all have bad days, and these ‘miserable beggars’ usually have more on their plate than we realise. Some are just naturally miserable though.
I think the majority of museums have decent staff within them, and hopefully the museums who have utter ***** in charge will last long enough to see a change in management.
Just a thought, have a look at the downlock mechanism on the undercarriage legs… there are a couple of rams on there, and I don’t have a photo……