dark light

JT442

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 870 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Lancaster Part – Can Anybody Identify? #1034805
    JT442
    Participant

    Just a thought, have a look at the downlock mechanism on the undercarriage legs… there are a couple of rams on there, and I don’t have a photo……

    in reply to: Miserable beggars #1025262
    JT442
    Participant

    Almost constant devotion to ‘their’ museums = stress
    Political in-fighting = stress
    No recognition = stress
    Managing director accountability =stress
    The above, but without pay = stress
    Responsibility for the operation of the museum = stress
    Public opinion of what they are doing wrong = stress
    Often personal expenditure for no return = stress
    Other job (in order to survive) = stress
    Endless phone calls from museum managers (usually whining) = stress

    Personal satisfaction in promoting heritage = fun
    Getting covered in old oil = fun

    I’m seeing a pattern here…… 😀

    in reply to: Miserable beggars #1034809
    JT442
    Participant

    Almost constant devotion to ‘their’ museums = stress
    Political in-fighting = stress
    No recognition = stress
    Managing director accountability =stress
    The above, but without pay = stress
    Responsibility for the operation of the museum = stress
    Public opinion of what they are doing wrong = stress
    Often personal expenditure for no return = stress
    Other job (in order to survive) = stress
    Endless phone calls from museum managers (usually whining) = stress

    Personal satisfaction in promoting heritage = fun
    Getting covered in old oil = fun

    I’m seeing a pattern here…… 😀

    in reply to: Lancaster Part – Can Anybody Identify? #1025309
    JT442
    Participant

    If the slow running cut off ram is the one which is located on the port lower side of the engine and attached to the lower strut of the engine mount, then I’d say no. (seen here tie-wrapped to the lower edge of the firewall). That said, its plausible that earlier marks of engine would have a different type of ram…. it appears to be a similar size. How I wish I had taken photos before it was pulled to bits.

    in reply to: Lancaster Part – Can Anybody Identify? #1034897
    JT442
    Participant

    If the slow running cut off ram is the one which is located on the port lower side of the engine and attached to the lower strut of the engine mount, then I’d say no. (seen here tie-wrapped to the lower edge of the firewall). That said, its plausible that earlier marks of engine would have a different type of ram…. it appears to be a similar size. How I wish I had taken photos before it was pulled to bits.

    in reply to: Lancaster Part – Can Anybody Identify? #1037341
    JT442
    Participant

    The only semi-educated guess is that it could be from a turret. There is a damper on each gun, BUT I don’t know whether this is the internals of said damper, or whether its something else entirely. I can’t see anything else obvious on my photos of PA474…..

    in reply to: WW2 Bomber Electrics #1037714
    JT442
    Participant

    … and as a direct answer to the question “Where can I find (detailed technical information on particular aircraft”, the answer MUST be to locate maintenance manuals relevant to the aircraft, or someone with access to such, and consult them.

    in reply to: WW2 Bomber Electrics #1037989
    JT442
    Participant

    24V is standard on most larger aircraft. 12V for the small stuff.

    in reply to: Duxford disposals #1037991
    JT442
    Participant

    Mike, the only advice I can give is don’t speculate, ask, or mention anything on here because they don’t like it and you will get nothing.

    in reply to: Jet Provost site #1038167
    JT442
    Participant

    There are a few pictures of XM419 and XM355 here: http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?t=104417&page=7
    Feel free to use whatever, so long as they are credited to Newcastle Aviation Academy.

    XM355 has had a bit of a spruce-up in the last couple of years and is now blue and white…..

    in reply to: TFC Engineer Vacancy #1044622
    JT442
    Participant

    I know. Thats why I mentioned it. Wages in both Warbirds and GA are terrible..

    I should also say thank you for pointing this out on behalf of the mechanics who ARE in a position to apply…. 😀

    in reply to: TFC Engineer Vacancy #1044651
    JT442
    Participant

    Given that most mechanics wouldn’t get out of bed for less than £25k, and techies for £35k-$40k… It’ll be interesting to find out what TFC could actually offer. Damn sure I couldn’t afford to move to Cambridge…. shame really.

    in reply to: Lower beacon for Vulcan. #1047143
    JT442
    Participant

    Yes it is… or at least it appears to be – and NEAM were after two…. also Newcastle Aviation Academy were after one……..

    Fight yer for it!

    Kidding…. I’ve contacted the bloke who buys stuff for NEAM and NAA….

    in reply to: BBMF Colours #1047589
    JT442
    Participant

    I’m sure Fluffy will be along in a while, but I’m fairly sure that the lanc gets new colours every major. The Coventry one was an obvious re-paint point since we had to split it in half and re-dope anyway. I’m not sure when the next one is due.

    in reply to: General Discussion #271360
    JT442
    Participant

    We did an APU run to test the PFCU we’d just changed on an F3 during a Primary servivcing in a HAS (no ground cart available). What we failed to do was check the rest of the system… the entire contents of the jet’s hyd system emptied through a vertically-pointing pipe and soaked the HAS roof. Thing is, what goes up, generally has to come back down….. 5 wet riggers and a flooded HAS….. We needed more than a rag to prevent that elbow drain….

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 870 total)