dark light

JT442

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 870 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The odds on being born again? #1835137
    JT442
    Participant

    The odds are the same as my ability to spell ‘scientific’……

    There is a slight error in what I said – the molecules would have to be the SAME ONES for true scientific re-incarnation – in otherwords, every atomic particle in your body reforming EXACTLY as it is now. Simply put, not going to happen with an almost infinite number of re-assembly options. To be honest, your body will revert to the core elements of which it is composed over time, and you will be spread across the planet, the galaxy and ultimately the universe VERY thinly….. You are composed of waste material from the stars, and that is all you will be in the future…. unless you have aspirations at an atomic level of being part of a rock…

    in reply to: General Discussion #290191
    JT442
    Participant

    That would depend on someone judging me on how I lived my life. … I’ll be a greenfly next then….

    in reply to: The odds on being born again? #1835259
    JT442
    Participant

    That would depend on someone judging me on how I lived my life. … I’ll be a greenfly next then….

    in reply to: General Discussion #290195
    JT442
    Participant

    In theory, the molecules that are arranged in such a way that you exist, COULD be dismantled and then re-assembled into exactly the same sequence as they are (true scienticic re-incarnation), but the mathematical odds on that are billions of billions to one. I’d love to give an exact figure, but it depends on how many fundamental molecular structures you contain and the number of possible combinations….

    As for the idea that your memories and experiences could be transferred into another body several hundred years later- utter tosh. Kindly explain how a mixture of chemical and electrical signals could transgress space and time…

    Spiritualists may have a plan… The idea that this ‘LIFE’ is no more than a learning playground is interesting, and may explain why some of the laws of physics are not particularly good too…. Think of a self imposed ‘Matrix’ (as in the film) where you pre-ordain what you want to acheive in life whether that be immense suffering, a long marriage (its the same thing…) or whatever. There is a line of thought within Spiritualism that in the ‘real’ world, we are close to about ten people, and it is these ten people who will be your companions through every life, but often in different forms – for example, your best mate could have actually been your dad or your wife (!) in a former life. Apparently its the richness and the diversity that life has to offer that is the learning experience.

    in reply to: The odds on being born again? #1835271
    JT442
    Participant

    In theory, the molecules that are arranged in such a way that you exist, COULD be dismantled and then re-assembled into exactly the same sequence as they are (true scienticic re-incarnation), but the mathematical odds on that are billions of billions to one. I’d love to give an exact figure, but it depends on how many fundamental molecular structures you contain and the number of possible combinations….

    As for the idea that your memories and experiences could be transferred into another body several hundred years later- utter tosh. Kindly explain how a mixture of chemical and electrical signals could transgress space and time…

    Spiritualists may have a plan… The idea that this ‘LIFE’ is no more than a learning playground is interesting, and may explain why some of the laws of physics are not particularly good too…. Think of a self imposed ‘Matrix’ (as in the film) where you pre-ordain what you want to acheive in life whether that be immense suffering, a long marriage (its the same thing…) or whatever. There is a line of thought within Spiritualism that in the ‘real’ world, we are close to about ten people, and it is these ten people who will be your companions through every life, but often in different forms – for example, your best mate could have actually been your dad or your wife (!) in a former life. Apparently its the richness and the diversity that life has to offer that is the learning experience.

    in reply to: A Home For Some Harvards #1045742
    JT442
    Participant

    Eshott would, I’m sure. try Durham Tees Valley too – lots of hangars there

    in reply to: Press Association – Red Arrows #1045750
    JT442
    Participant

    RIP Flt Lt. Jon Egging (Red 4)

    in reply to: UK News channels are reporting a Red Arrow down #2328222
    JT442
    Participant

    MOD via BBC confirm pilot killed. Condolences to all concerned. 🙁
    RIP Flt Lt. Jon Egging

    in reply to: F-104G Starfighter for sale, £25,000 o.n.o. #1047524
    JT442
    Participant

    Its been there for a couple of years. Bloodnok hits the nail on the head – his business is mainly focussed around the high quality finish of the smaller components (which again are VERY expensive), but do sell well.

    in reply to: F-104G Starfighter for sale, £25,000 o.n.o. #1048490
    JT442
    Participant

    Seriously £25000 for 4 tonnes of aluminium? No engine….. What is the world coming to? I can get AIRWORTHY aircraft for less than that….

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 discussion thread Mk2 #1049827
    JT442
    Participant

    How many of us here are paid to be professional writers and researchers, and are supposed to deliver quality news items to an audience of millions?

    in reply to: Questions for Meteor Experts #1049846
    JT442
    Participant

    Your ‘winglets’ are aerials… and I’d hazard a guess that they are modern fit
    The inlets, I would imagine (I’m not an expert on meteors) would be for either avionic cooling or fuel tank pressurisation, although I can’t find them on any other meteor except Classic Flight’s NF11

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 discussion thread Mk2 #1049852
    JT442
    Participant

    It would appear that whilst some of the typo’s have been corrected, they are still referring to XH558 as the Type, ie. The XH558, rather than the registration mark. The level of research shines through…. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: DC-3 PH-PBA Dutch Dakota Association? #1050685
    JT442
    Participant

    Edinburgh apparently. Something on at the castle at 12.30

    in reply to: General Discussion #292420
    JT442
    Participant

    I saw the title of the thread and have only just stopped laughing enough to type…

    Kill them all. There is an old Roman punishment which would fit, rather than clogging up the prisons. You need a cat, a dog, a hessian sack… and a river. Put it this way… the cat and dog will probably survive…. and the convict wouldn’t drown…

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 870 total)