I think a smaller museum could have a good chance of restoring a large aircraft. The large museums have budgets and time limits to worry about – the small museums generally don’t. If a restoration took five years longer than anticipated, then so be it. If it cost £5000 or £500,000, then so what.. there is no-one counting the pennies. Funding would come directly from donations and the direct fund-raising the small museums have been good at for the last 40 years. Newark and Gatwick are prime examples of how small dedicated bands of volunteers can restore large airframes to an acceptable standard. The Shackleton Association at Coventry probably had an even smaller pile of cash available, and look at what they have acheived!
NEAM’s Vulcan is perhaps not a shining example of restoration at it’s peak, HOWEVER it is still in one bit, and work continues to prevent it’s death (predominantly looked after by ONE volunteer currently). Without small museums pouring all they have into large aircraft, think how much poorer the UK preservation movement would be…
I have done a survey on it and it is restorable over a long period of time and would need considerable funds spent on it. (edited re:negotiaions)
I will not comment further due to some ongoing negotiations, but rest assured, IWM are doing all they can for the aircraft. It is indoors and not deteriorating as fast as it would be outside.
From too many display aircraft, to too few…..
Merlin… which ‘badly corroded one’ at Duxford?…. 😉 Moving a Shack to DX is fantasy since they are looking to rationalise the large ‘unmanagable’ airframes they alreay have.
Personally, I’d stick to supporting Gatwick museum before speculating on where and how their impressive collection would be dispersed. If the ‘worst comes to the worst’ only vast amounts of money would save the larger airframes.
Looks like a Slingsby Firefly
“Car pulls into roadside following engine failure”
“Aircraft lands in field following engine failure”
Slow news day obviously.
Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! Thank you!
……… I can sleep again…………………. unlike Mike, who will now have a resurgence in nightmares……
Aww, someone left the Spitfire on a hot wash for too long……
Nearly a good view of Leeming’s tower…. twitch, twitch…… 😮
see post #13…. 😀
I NEED to find a picture of that tower… it’s driving me mad because I KNOW it’s Leeming given that I was stationed there… I just don’t have the photographic proof…..:mad:
Mark 12 – your pic confirmed as Leeming : http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/403594.html
According to the plaque, the stone was a donation to go with the aircraft so it would not surprise me if they did cart the rocks around too…. and I’m damned if I an find a picture of the Leeming water(?) tower to confirm the OP’s picture.
Same rockery, same building as the previous – quoted as Leeming
http://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/5356582724/
http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/photo/403593.html
http://www.abpic.co.uk/photo/1266214/
So based on the rockery and foliage… I’d say that the OP’s photo was taken at Leeming
3/4 of the way down this page is confirmation of JAGx204’s stone spotting skills…….
http://www.airfieldinformationexchange.org/community/showthread.php?865-Gate-Guards/page10
the pic below is where I would imagine it was… the majority of the pathways and ‘H’ blocks were altered in 1988, and again since. The tower seen in the OP’s pic is to the bottom left.
Northumberland Gazette article on the GNFI
http://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/news/local-news/a_feast_of_flight_1_3527760
The question is, HOW can we make it better for next year?
A decision regarding XF708 is with the IWM trustees as we speak. Have faith. 😉
Can we get back to supporting Gatwick?….