dark light

JT442

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 870 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Taylor Mono plane help! #399166
    JT442
    Participant

    The world of light aircraft is a bit scary… since the LAA are in effect, the design authority for the type, you’d have hoped that they would have a set of plans in an archive somewhere…. ah well, over to the Taylor owners…

    in reply to: Taylor Mono plane help! #399182
    JT442
    Participant

    You’re going to tension your flight controls to a figure suggested on a forum? Ask the LAA Engineering team…….

    in reply to: "Red Tails" Stukas #982441
    JT442
    Participant

    Too late. Still, I could become a ghost writer…

    Coat, bum, door, way out etc.

    in reply to: "Red Tails" Stukas #982455
    JT442
    Participant

    No point leaving. Hell, if I took offence to correction when I was wrong, I’d have killed myself by now. 😉

    in reply to: "Red Tails" Stukas #982544
    JT442
    Participant

    Picture No.1 is real. The question was asked about the model, which did exist. Hopefully it has been answered in one of the links by Matty. Can we move on?

    in reply to: Oil change method #399187
    JT442
    Participant

    An oil change will never change all of the oil – hot or cold, there will always be some left in the smaller galleries and as a coating on all exposed parts.

    Following various AMMs for engine overhaul / storage, etc, the correct procedure seems to be to get the engine oil hot, drain it out. Refill, run and drain. Any oil left in the galleries should be of a higher percentage of new oil.

    There is an issue – it’s damned expensive and more than a bit wasteful.. unless you happen to own a Gulf State….

    in reply to: "Red Tails" Stukas #983042
    JT442
    Participant

    Someone forgot to tell the film crew that it was CGI….. OP 1 : Experts 0

    http://www.network54.com/Forum/149674/thread/1325893980/Nice+big+Ju.87+model

    “sorry to be negative but peoples inability to spot obvious CGI from real never ceases to amaze me!”
    Sorry to be negative, but peoples inability to spot obvious reality from CGI never ceases to amaze me! :p (No offence intended, but such things make me chuckle….)

    in reply to: XH558 – the future! #983215
    JT442
    Participant

    £400,000 for a large aircraft servicing (C-check) is cheap.

    in reply to: Victor XL231 And Nimrod XV250 Work Diary #984592
    JT442
    Participant

    Many years ago, we had the YAM Halifax, BBMF’s Lancaster and Sally B parked at the end of the runway with Lindy looking on. I miss the airshows!

    in reply to: New North East Regional Airport #529384
    JT442
    Participant

    Phil, PLEASE stop posting this! I stitch my sides back together and then find it posted again. I’m crying with laughter!

    Exhibit a: Newcastle International Airport – £50 million in debt with no real expansion plans.

    Exhibit b: Durham Tees Valley Airport – No aircraft! (it does have a few regional jobs and a dismantling facility)

    Why would anyone want another airport in a region which can’t sustain two?

    in reply to: 747 at Newcastle #449562
    JT442
    Participant

    No idea. I couldn’t get the right angle to get the registration, and it was dark when it flew in. The other photo I’ve seen from a different angle has a windsock strategically placed…….

    Flight radar 24 claimed it was A6-MMM, flight number DUB002

    in reply to: What's this handle for? #992618
    JT442
    Participant

    I imagine that its quite a large step straight up to the wing…..

    Edit: Damn. beaten by 30 seconds! 😀

    in reply to: General Discussion #284688
    JT442
    Participant

    It was an accessible location to get the latest news or sports headlines. I used it until the advent of the ‘red button’. Other than better graphics, the red button hasn’t moved much past Ceefax (and the Teletext on ITV). The news headlines are still in basic text format, but this newer format is a bit more expandable. (Yes I too used to play Bamboozle….)

    It’s gone, but should not be forgotten as it was the dawn of the ‘on-demand’ age.

    in reply to: CEEFAX to end after 38 years. #1880445
    JT442
    Participant

    It was an accessible location to get the latest news or sports headlines. I used it until the advent of the ‘red button’. Other than better graphics, the red button hasn’t moved much past Ceefax (and the Teletext on ITV). The news headlines are still in basic text format, but this newer format is a bit more expandable. (Yes I too used to play Bamboozle….)

    It’s gone, but should not be forgotten as it was the dawn of the ‘on-demand’ age.

    in reply to: Hello Everyone I'm New #399732
    JT442
    Participant

    How would you set the rules though? You’d get every lunatic in the world showing up to get the ‘value’ of a corroded heap of aluminium or trying to flog it to gullible enthusiasts (there are some!), being told it’s scrap here by those who know, and then it appears on flea-bay for £2000 as a rare Spitfire component as endorsed by Key Publishing……

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 870 total)