dark light

JT442

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 870 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1088180
    JT442
    Participant

    I agree with Air Ministry, they have tended to avoid the issue of the bomb bay names from the first round of fundraising….. oh and I wouldn’t give them a penny – there are far more deserving projects.

    What I have an issue with is people reading between the lines to spread malcontent.

    They are terrible communicators, BUT the have, for once, NOT said “Give us your cash or we’ll sell it to America”. What they have said is that they want to put two plaques in the aircraft – one during the winter sevice and another representing a flying season. They have not stated that if we don’t donate, they cannot fund the service.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1088190
    JT442
    Participant

    They are not asking for donations specific to the winter service, simply asking for money and mentioning that the service is expensive.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1088206
    JT442
    Participant

    So where does this statement say that a) they don’t have the money to do the service, and b) That they haven’t started?

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1088270
    JT442
    Participant

    Anyway, back on track (please stop talking evryone… thats why we have other threads and the PM system….

    Certainly a nice pair on Sally B, however, these are a nice pair too

    in reply to: General Discussion #305424
    JT442
    Participant

    Dead right. maiden don’t swear (although thy did say S**t in ‘Holy smoke’ back in the mid ’80s..). The crowds are generally well behaved. No violence, unlike the old Sepultura gigs! Take him there, enjoy!

    in reply to: My Son wants to see Iron Maiden… #1894722
    JT442
    Participant

    Dead right. maiden don’t swear (although thy did say S**t in ‘Holy smoke’ back in the mid ’80s..). The crowds are generally well behaved. No violence, unlike the old Sepultura gigs! Take him there, enjoy!

    in reply to: Mercury/Aluminium Problems #1088632
    JT442
    Participant

    “One difficulty encountered when using these alloys is the ability to contain them. All of the alloys which are liquid at room temperature contain gallium. Gallium is corrosive to various metals, especially when hot. As the temperature of the gallium is raised, it becomes increasingly corrosive, reacting through thicker layers in a short amount of time. One metal which gallium is very reactive with is aluminum. It will corrode through .002″ thick aluminum foil within hours at room temperature, and at 500°- 1000°C, this reaction becomes much faster.

    Gallium is non-reactive with other metals however such as molybdenum, tungsten, and nickel.”

    Read more: http://blogs.indium.com/blog/indalloy#ixzz1ArSOn1mV

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1088708
    JT442
    Participant

    Aww, its got a broken tail. So had PA474 back in 2006 at Coventry

    in reply to: Mercury/Aluminium Problems #1088747
    JT442
    Participant

    Over a (short) period of time, the mercury an aluminium oxidise to form black powder deposits as the corrosion. Its nasty and the only way to repair it is to remove the affected areas of aluminium. No danger of anyone purposely ruining an aircraft like this… firstly when was the last time you saw a mecury thermometer in a shop?…. they ain’t made any more…. Secondly, its a cargo hold item only.

    Mercury spillages are almost impossible to clean up since the droplets spread like ball bearings an you can’t pick the damn things up! A strong vaccuum is the best bet…. THEN remove the affected areas of aluminium…..

    This link is quite useful…:

    http://avstop.com/maint/corrosion/ch7.html

    Picturefrom here:
    http://www.projectrho.com/rocket/basicdesign.php

    in reply to: A Time for Reflection #1090307
    JT442
    Participant

    Duplication is not an issue IMHO. I want to take the kids to an aircaft museum on a whim. If it wasn’t for my local museum, complete with Vampire T11, Mystere, Hunter and any other duplicated aircraft, my next nearest one is three hours drive (on a good day). Duplication is good from a geographical sence. Sorry, but the kids are not interested in driving 8 hours each way to see for exaqmple, the only Sandringham in the country…

    in reply to: Can anyone identify this aircraft #1090317
    JT442
    Participant

    Lockheed Constitution

    edit… damn.

    in reply to: The And Now For Something Completely Different….Thread #1091342
    JT442
    Participant

    From Team Viper, to Viper Powered – Jet Provost T3 owned by the Newcastle Jet Provost Club at Newcastle Aviation Academy last year

    in reply to: BAPC no's #1091833
    JT442
    Participant

    Best bet is to contact the BAPC secretary via the Website – he’s normally pretty quick with the replies and he will furnish you with all the informaqtion you require….(or I’ll ask him on Monday if I remember).

    in reply to: Lanterns #416473
    JT442
    Participant

    In that case, I have a cunning plan.

    We need to come up with a chargable scheme whereby the farmers pay us to educate their cattle about the dangers of eating splintered bamboo, or even whole lantern frames. We could charge several hundred pounds for this amazing service and invest our capital in some up and coming asian illuminated flying decoration company…

    in reply to: Interesting article in Aeroplane on the Avro York #1096702
    JT442
    Participant

    Its not intact, and certainly not preserved, so can it really be called a survivor? Looks pretty dead to me…

Viewing 15 posts - 781 through 795 (of 870 total)