In testing the F-117, one of the V-tails fell right off in flight – if my memory serves me right. The pilot didn’t notice it as the FBW automatically compensated for the loss – but as soon as the chase plane spotted it – it was a quick RTB.
________
Shower Xxx
I’d rather think that many people want the very capable Euro made products to be preffered or atleast given equal weight . I really cant blame either the press or the public in general for such a sentiment , it is the same worldwide.
I agree with you here. I’m more of an EF fan than say an F-35 fan – but one thing the press in England seem to do is belittle an alternative product to promote our own systems. Im not sure if that is the case in the States – you guys seem to focus on your product a lot more?
________
Cat wheel
There seems to be a lot of anti-JSF talk in the UK and Europe. I get the feeling many people want it to fail – or mabye all the programs over here are destined for bad press uptill their operational debuts. But what I want to know is: for NATO countries which probably won’t operate without US support and US based air-superiority in form of the F-22 – is the strike optimised platform not the best bet?
________
Jizz
Dude, research a bit more about efficiency at such speed, structural limits of the fan blades, and the 22’s engine configuration…..
Ok, this topic is about the JSF/GNG, just dropped the bomb on that M1.5 SC EF claim, which i found striking similar to another case..
Lol matey G :). You don’t actually think I was claiming the F-22 can SC at Mach 2.5 do you? 🙂 My degree course is apparently on the types of things we are debating :). What I was trying to do was highlight the fact that the F-22 has lots of excees thrust – and while using a static thrust comparison is erroneous on my part. It was only to highlight the F-22s ability to hit Mach 1.82 in straight & level cruise conditions – something you refuse to believe despite it being published. Anyway I’ve tried so that’s all I will say on the matter to you – believe it or don’t :).
________
Blow Jobs
Lol 🙂 Let me quote myself:
It can achieve SC of Mach 1.82 and who knows if that’s the absolute upper limit. Will an F-22 always be cruising at Mach 1.82? Obviously not. No one is saying that – is that what you were thinking?
But the point is FTD and now AFM use the speeds above as the operational F-22 SC speed. Its not that hard to understand :). Cruise conditions – I repeat are not taken in a dive – the temperature and hence the local speed of sound is fairly constant above the 11 km mark at 216.6 K and the F-22 flies clean with probably 26000lb of thrust in each engine. 4000lb + thrust more than an F-15C with P&W F100-P220 turbofans in afterburner. That could potentially get to Mach 2.5 clean.
________
Cat wheel
I personally think the Eurofighters display is awesome – I prefer it to the SH and it equals or exceeds the older block F-16s in my opinion.
________
OPIATE REHAB ADVICE
Mate the reports as you seem to be mentioning are probably based on the ATF requirements :). Do you know sometimes aircraft actually have the ability to exceed their requirements? 🙂 When the requirements become standard performance specs – stated by operational pilots then I think you can start using them. Do you still believe the Raptor is limited to Mach 1.8 max speed?
________
PREGNANT MEXICAN
Over G – the official sources are saying its Mach 1.7+. Do you know what the FTD was? – Flight Test Data –
http://www.f22-raptor.com/technology/data.html
Which tech papers? 🙂 The old outdated ones before the jet was operational? Ah I thought so. 🙂
Did technical papers state that the Mig-25 could fly at Mach 3?
Again cruise conditions are not dive conditions. They taken from 11 km up or higher where the temperature is 216.6 K, while the air pressure still drops with height. So whats your problem with Mach Number :)?
________
Paxil Settlements
While to a large extent that is probably true in the sense that if flown properly the F-22 has many overwhelming abilities. But that does not means it is totally unbeatable. There are many ways to skin a cat. Attack it on the ground(the best option) – Overwhelm it with numbers etc etc etc. But I’d rather be in an F-22 than fighting it and I’d bet if truely honest, any FJ pilot would be the same.
________
Expert Insurance
Your not going to get the story – the official data points to Mach 1.7+. Accept it or don’t; and it should be easier as the F-22 flies clean.
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123009594
Scroll to the bottom of the page.
________
HEADSHOPS
There are just as many crazy claims about eastern equipment as there are about the western kit. 🙂
________
MAINE DISPENSARY
Ok firstly cruise conditions are not measured in a dive. Secondly the F-22 has demonstrated SC of Mach 1.82 – which is what we are saying. It can achieve SC of Mach 1.82 and who knows if that’s the absolute upper limit. Will an F-22 always be cruising at Mach 1.82? Obviously not :). No one is saying that 🙂 – is that what you were thinking :)? Over G over the years you seem to have become less ‘anti’ towards anything western equipment – but please read what people are saying :). No one is trying to say the F-22 is unbeatable.
________
Body science
Yes this generation jargon has become accepted in Europe to classify aircraft.
As for over G the Mach 1.82 claim for SC comes from the 1st and 192nd FW’s – operational squadrons flying operational jets. The fact of the matter is the F-22 can cruise at Mach 1.82 period. Accept it or at least stay current. Just as pro-western enthusiats accept a Mig-25 can hit Mach 3+ despite it only officially being capable of Mach 2.8.
________
Dodge Charger Daytona
The F-35 in the strike role has the advantage of greater internal fuel – a wing more focused on bomb trucking and internal sensors that are ideal for AtG. Obviously LO – to whatever extent export versions are this will still be an advantage. It will be interesting to see how they data-link it. The F-22 has an LPI data-link. How they make that compatible with Link-16 is the current challenge with a few possible solutions. If they add link-16 to export versions of the F-35 it might indicate degraded stealth.
________
MEDIGAP FORUMS