dark light

baj

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 92 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Id of wreckage in WW2 photo, P-47? #897310
    baj
    Participant

    P-47

    in reply to: 20 Carrier Air Group, Royal Australian Navy. #899107
    baj
    Participant

    The main flying base for the RAN was HMAS Albatross on the NSW south coast some ~160km south of Sydney. Country looks similar with lots of ocean inlet lakes in the region.

    Possible local candidates in this area include Lake Conjola and Narooma….

    in reply to: Hurricane at Pays facility Australia #900211
    baj
    Participant

    Can hardly wait to see it

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #861026
    baj
    Participant

    Thank you D9F.

    Baj, I have worked in the industry for many years. I have many Spitfires under my belt, and have reasonable experience of other types as well. I don’t make my remarks lightly.

    My point, quite simply, is that an aircraft not built to the original design cannot be considered as a replica of the original. I don’t dislike the Flugwerk aircraft, but they aren’t right. Every one is different, and has different solutions to a number of flaws in the design. Things like, in one case, an oil cooler buried in the gun bay. In another, a complete Tu2 power egg. It was a good idea, but it failed at the last hurdle.

    It is of course, my opinion. There’s a lot of that on the Internet. In fact, naked ladies aside, opinion makes up 75 percent of what you will find!

    I did write a piece on the restoration of the real thing for Classic Wings a few years ago.

    Bruce

    Thanks Bruce your gentleman

    in reply to: P-51 Drop tank?? Help please! :) #863618
    baj
    Participant

    P47

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #864455
    baj
    Participant

    Thanks Dora.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #864535
    baj
    Participant

    Which would make it similar to many of the Spitfires and Mustangs out there…and whose news is welcomed here.

    The percentage of mostly original flying warbirds out there is fairly small. Remember, we’re discussing 75 year old aircraft that were designed to have a service life of a few months.
    We’re lucky any are still flying.

    Perhaps it’s time for the backbenchers (i.e. people who don’t restore, own or fly warbirds) to be less snobby.

    J Boyle: Your last sentence is a breath of fresh air, thank-you.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #864539
    baj
    Participant

    It would be churlish of me to go quite that far, as I clearly haven’t tried it all!

    The referenced article sums it up reasonably well.

    Bruce

    Aah common Bruce the definition of Churlish is “rude” or perhaps you meant as “impolite” or perhaps you meant it as “uncivil”. I just don’t get it Bruce. As a fellow hands on restorer I would encourage you that its not rude at all.

    Myself and all the others are genuinely interested in in your “heavy involvement” in the “real” one. Please tell us all about it.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #864548
    baj
    Participant

    Agreed, the reality is that every historic aircraft flying by the definitions espoused on this thread could easily flick between being a replica, to a reproduction, to a restoration, depending on levels and authenticity of equipment used.

    Does the use of a “none aircraft grade aluminium bracket” to hold a modern radio unit count.

    Further, should a restoration only be called a restoration if authentic original 2024 aluminium sheeting from the exact year of original aircrafts manufacture is used and what about the rivets ? We could go on and on.

    The academia of some experts on this forum is breath taking but the average humble Mr & Mrs Average who pay the air show or museum entry fees don’t really care.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #865843
    baj
    Participant

    If only you could see the damage you are doing with those childish little snipes. I was interested until I read your photo footnote. Now I don’t care.
    Time to grow up I think.

    TT18Timbo he is exited and happy about the event. He loves photos. Please cut him some slack.He has a quirky sense of humour which some can find challenging.

    Don’t you agree it is interesting news.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #865850
    baj
    Participant

    Why would anyone think it doesn’t exist? You do seem to have a chip on your shoulder Daniel.

    Mike J he is exited and happy about the event. He loves photos. Please cut him some slack. He has a quirky sense of humour which some can find challenging.

    It is nevertheless interesting to read about.

    in reply to: FW-190 warbird delivered to Australia #865862
    baj
    Participant

    Can you explain a bit the differences, Bruce? Interested to know what major differences there are. So nothing from a FlugWerk fits a real one?

    Ya common Bruce please elaborate a little bit more please…..
    I’m also a practical hands on guy with experience on Sabres,Vampires, Catalinas, DC4, DC3, Caribou etc and where authentic parts are often not interchangeable between authentic aircraft. Its always interesting to hear from people with some inside knowledge and understanding.

    in reply to: Hunter Valley airshow – warbirds review #868850
    baj
    Participant

    Some lovely photos thanks Phil

    in reply to: Save a Shackleton #898639
    baj
    Participant

    Just a quick question but does this example still have engines? If so could they be restored to ground running on the Bruntingthorpe airframe?

    The tender documents (See link on 1st post) talk in terms of -“Inhibited Engines”

    in reply to: Film of Spitfires Being Used As Targets #993141
    baj
    Participant

    .
    It stings to watch it……

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 92 total)