Is there not a registrationlist which spitfire missions flew out to the west of Holland Near Amsterdam/Schiphol at March 3, 1943?

Thanks for your reply!
The witness told me: “in was a English bomber” “in the early morning, at 9am”
“There was no fire after the impact only damage because of the airpressure”.
“There were 2 people at work in the kitchen, both people did not survice the impact” (I think the were making the breakfast?)

That is what the witness told me….Problably 9am, could be 7am?

The witness also told me:”some people were still in bed during the impact”

Does anyone have any suggestions to know more about this?

Hello,

I am working at a website about the surroundings of Schiphol (Haarlemmermeer). So A witness told me the above story. That is why i want to find out which bomber problably is responsible for this accident?

I hope someone can help me.

The website will be ready at may 2012 (first in English, maybe later in English)
http://www.haarlemmermeer1940-1945.nl

Then again, it may be just a poor translation -> forest fire due to lightning strike?

Yes, that is also possible:)

What they are saying is that you apparently own ONE copy of the photograph. Other people apparently own other copies of it.

Who has the original negative?

Maybe it is better to prove me that someone else have the negative….
Or an copy of the photograph.
At least I already have an real photo from the ’40

So untill you prove me I am not the only one, I think this discussion is closed!

(this was my last reaction on this off-topic waste….I can use my time better that this…)

Vincent,

I think what people are pointing out that you put “(c) Vincent van Rijn” over your photograph.

I think I understand why you did it – so that you could show people to ask the question without allowing anyone else using the picture themselves without asking you. This is totally understandable.

I think the confusion is that you’ve marked the photo as being copyright to you when in fact, legally you do not own the actual “copyright”. That would be he held by the original photographer or the person they were employed by at the time.

Anyway I think maybe it’s a case of things getting lost in translation 🙂

The best advice is that when posting pictures that you don’t want other to use, simply put a few red lines or other pattern across it so that it would be hard to reproduce and just not your name on it. Putting the copyright word or symbol on a picture you don’t actually own copyright too could get you into all sorts of legal trouble.

I have the photo here, so what is the problem?
Let them prove me, that the copyrights belong to someone else.
Then I will remove it…..
Until that, I do not see the problem….

I have the photo here. So I do not know what the problem is?
This all is off-topic……