Page 3 – Key Publishing

Francois5

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 105 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →

Author

Posts
October 26, 2006 at 2:58 pm in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084091

Francois5
Participant

Give it up, swerve.
We don’t have the history book re-wrotten by the central party.

October 26, 2006 at 9:57 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084450

Francois5
Participant

Well, left school 20 years ago, so I don’t see your point (no chinese there).
Then, every mil-related forum has the same threads with the same ppl saying the same thing.
Is that normality? Can’t I complain here?

I don’t care someone is black or green. I care if someone flood the whole world with the same crap. What is the point? To show they are here? Ok, we saw, thank you.

They are not numerous, always the same guys!!!!!!

October 26, 2006 at 9:20 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084500

Francois5
Participant

I wonder when they will claim Malacca as a whole.
Even if they think passing it by founding the Kra-canal.

October 26, 2006 at 9:08 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084507

Francois5
Participant

It is worse then that swerve.
China is claiming the whole Kyushu archipelago, not quite noisily though.
The problem that there are several major US bases there.
There is not ONE piece of land around China that is not claimed actually.

October 26, 2006 at 8:17 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084619

Francois5
Participant

You are boring, Crobato!
Takeshima
Takeshima

October 26, 2006 at 7:41 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084695

Francois5
Participant

Why bother? 😮 The emptiest vessel makes the most noise, 😀 I won’t be bothered by a bird cha-cha outside my window, would you? 😎

Let’s see (the proof by the numbers):
Crobato: 5517 posts.
Pinko: 534 posts.

You won young girls!
Who is the noisy full of it here? LOL!

Japan has not invided any country lately, did it?
Senkaku, Takishima and North Territories are 100% defendable from the japanese side!
Not one sigle case in the chinese claims is defendable in front of a court. Not one.

October 26, 2006 at 6:55 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084773

Francois5
Participant

And here above a typical answer from “I-don’t-know-what-I-am-talking-about”.
Putain de merde!

October 26, 2006 at 5:37 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084837

Francois5
Participant

star49 is a daydreamer LOL!

October 26, 2006 at 5:16 am in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2084877

Francois5
Participant

Well, China can’t nuke Japan.
It would have a tremendous repercution and would surely mean the end of China.
Japan has no nukes, and wiil stay that way.
So if you try anything that way, you will have ALL OTHER NUCLEAR POWERS bombing you.
That is that simple.

Now, who is the country claiming all neighbors lands and islands?
Not Japan that I know.
So we ALL know the purpose for China to field carriers.

October 25, 2006 at 2:15 pm in reply to: VIRGINIA CLASS SSN !! #2085355

Francois5
Participant

I would not put one of my men in a russian sub.
I would not even check hand with a former sov sailor.
Cancer (asbestos) or cancer (gamma)?

“Akula 3” doesn’t meaning anything.

October 25, 2006 at 2:05 pm in reply to: China wants to buy Rafales for it's fleet of carriers? #2085381

Francois5
Participant

Nowadays, every and each “military” forum has the same chinese sections with the same handles agreeing (no debate allowed) the same subject again and again… spreading the same pictures, the same lies and the same Adobe Photoshops (C) again and again…

If many sources say the same thing, does it becomes the truth?

Where am I??? What is this??? Is it a huge joke??? :confused:
Turbinia, Neptune, MyFather, the others… what?

October 25, 2006 at 6:37 am in reply to: SHEER USN might #2085744

Francois5
Participant

Definitively the structures of the Varyag (I hope you chinese will correct the spelling at Viagra when it comes in service!).
With CATOBAR, I give the chinese 30 years to master the design.
If in 30 years they keep flying the -33s… I am scared!

October 25, 2006 at 5:22 am in reply to: SHEER USN might #2085793

Francois5
Participant

This is for chinese kids to think about:

In comparison, the DoN Battle Force alone operates a fleet of fighting warships with an aggregate displacement of 2.85 million tons. At the height of its naval dominance, the England strove to achieve at least a “two-navy standard.” That is, British naval planners aimed to maintain a navy that was as large as the combined fleets of the closest two naval powers.
In terms of aggregate warship tonnage, then, the United States enjoys a “17-navy standard.” Indeed, at 94 percent of the total aggregate ROW tonnage, the US war fleet displaces nearly as much as all other warships in the world’s navies, combined.

October 24, 2006 at 4:59 am in reply to: The best SSK till date? #2086879

Francois5
Participant

US/UK/France have a deterrence fleet, which can only be nuclear powered.
The three of them has carrier fleet(s) that need fast subs for underwater protection.

A park of both D-E/Nukes is a waist of money (training x2, maintenance x2 etc…) as 90% of tasks propoer to D-E can be done by SSNs.

T-2400 are not very big boats. Kilos are big outside, and small inside!

October 24, 2006 at 2:02 am in reply to: CVF News #2086943

Francois5
Participant

But it is going to be like the FREMM program.
The French gov will try to be as close as possible to the other’s spec in order to match maximum commonality.
And again (like the FREMM) that will be a give-only game from France.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 105 total)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →