dark light

cloud_9

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,135 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #506160
    cloud_9
    Participant

    I absolutely completely 100% disagree, it has everything to do with it in my mind. The reason being airlines are businesses the same as any other and anyone who believes otherwise is living in a dream world. Airlines are affected by the same basic problems everyone from car washes to garden centres face. If you have a job at one company and someone else gets paid less to do essentially the same job elsewhere then you’re lucky to be where you are and you should damned well remember that.

    Ok, so to apply this to my job then…ground handling. The company I work for is in fact one of the more expensive ground handling companies to use at LHR…but that is because we are passionate about the service that we provide and we all believe that the price for this level of service is worth paying for. Naturally we have lost some contracts to our competitors, but that is simply because they have chosen to under-cut us so substantially that they are in fact operating at a loss far more than what we are…and I am sure if you asked the airlines themselves, the level of service that they have recieved has probably be worse as well, because the workers do not get paid as much as us.

    So yes, there are other ground handling companies out there that do pay less for what is essentially the same job as myself…and yes, I should perhaps consider myself to be lucky (I do!;)), but if a similar situation was to occur at my workplace as to what is happening at BA at the moment, there would almost certainly be a strike becuase we as workers are not prepared to be told to work for less and yet be expected to deliver the same standard of service that is currently being asked of us…how is that in anyway fair on us?!

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #506170
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Well that is how it may come across to you…of course everyone has their own opinions, so yet again, we are going to have to agree to disagree.

    I think you’ll find though that these people care far more about BA and the customers that they serve on a daily basis…far more than the management do!

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #506178
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Ok Bmused55, let the CEO sack 43% of the workforce, seeing as he would have to get rid of them all at the same time…then lets see where that gets him and his company!

    And Paul, just to be clear…the crew are not venting their frustrations at the travelling public at all, they are venting them solely at BA management, its just unfortunately that being in the “service” industry, the travelling public are the uneccesary victims of all of this…so don’t be quite so ridiculous!

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #506199
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Well there is clearly more to the issue than it just simply being about the travel benefits Bmused55…

    The fact that BA cabin crew already get paid more than some pilots at other airlines is irrelevant to a certain extent. What other airlines choose to pay their staff is down to them, and its the choice of the people who choose to work for those other airlines as to whether they accept those wages and conditions!

    The real question here is why on earth would people vote to go on strike, and choose to recieve “strike pay”, which is far less than their usual wage if they didn’t feel that the issue they were fighting for wasn’t important enough?

    And despite claiming that they [BA] will be able to operate all their long-haul flights, the cost of a fresh round of strikes and the damage done to their already tarnished reputation will do absolutely nothing to help BA’s financial position, unless they have got another £150m or so to simply just throw away like last time…?

    As I have said before in the previous thread on this topic, in my opinion, the main crux of the problem here is WW and his “union-bashing” antics which he has brought over from his days as CEO of Aer Lingus and has tried to implement at BA, and so far they have not worked!

    All we can hope for now is that the new CEO of BA uses a bit more common sense and chooses to sit down, listen and negotiate in order to find an settlement to this dispute once and for all, which is at the end of the day in the interests of both parties invovled!

    in reply to: BA cabin crew back new strikes…again! #506362
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Would you prefer to live in a country where strikes and unions are illegal – like China, perhaps?

    It would appear though that quite a few people above would be prepared to do just that, seeing as they would obviously be prepared to accept whatever their employer says/does to them, regardless of the impact/s it might have on their living standards, thus making them slaves in effect!

    in reply to: FlyBe legal scam #506543
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Simply saying ‘yes’ and giving them your card details wins you the £15.

    Surely if anyone asks for any kind of sensitive information for something other than what you are initially paying for, in this particular case flights were the initial product/service, do you not think that it would be sensible to check the small print before disclosing your details?:confused:

    Although, that said, it does seem rather wrong of Flybe to try pursuading their customers to give their card details out to other companies, as I am sure they are probably only doing this so that they can recieve a commission from them?

    in reply to: Southwest warns on switch to Airbus – In today's FT #506791
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Yes, sadly you have to register and pay to read articles on the FT.com website. The Times and a few other newspapers have also started to charge for their online content.:mad:

    in reply to: Mostly Motley Medley ? #502555
    cloud_9
    Participant

    A great collection of shots there Keith, thanks for sharing.:)

    Am I right in thinking that Blue Line went out of business last year?
    If so, who owns this particular aircraft now and how comes its still in Blue Line livery?!:confused:

    in reply to: Why…? #506964
    cloud_9
    Participant

    I feel a jail term is probably a bit extreme in a situation like this, however I do agree that arrest, prosecution and a substantial fine for the theft of the item and the interfering with safety equipment of an aeroplane charge should be automatic as this will result in a person ending up with a criminal record (unless they already have one for any previous offences!;)), which will not look good if/when said person is applying for any new position/job in the future.

    in reply to: Ryanair loses court case #508209
    cloud_9
    Participant

    So whilst I do not directly looking down on people who fly with Ryanair, I do believe that they should be aware of the consequences of their choice of travel provider. If they still want to travel with Ryanair – and sadly it won’t surprise me that most will – then I accept that but don’t necessarily respect them for making that choice.

    Thank you Andy, this is the point that I was trying to get across, but you clearly have a better way of phrasing it than what do.:)

    in reply to: Ryanair loses court case #508232
    cloud_9
    Participant

    I know and I wasn’t referring to you as being the one looking down on anyone. 🙂

    I do hope you are not referring to me…at no point have I said that I look down on anyone for choosing who they fly with!:mad:

    in reply to: Ryanair loses court case #508409
    cloud_9
    Participant

    No Paul, it doesnt cause me a problem at all…like you said in your post, it’s your personal choice, but if more people were aware of the dubious business practices that they [Ryanair] employ, then perhaps things in the aviation industry wouldn’t be so cost-driven thesedays and the quality of the service onboard might improve somewhat.

    in reply to: Ryanair loses court case #508429
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Sadly mrtotty the reason people chose to fly with the likes of Ryanair is because its “cheap”…or at least the advert leads you to think its cheap!

    As the initial post suggests, this ruling could end up being fought in/at the EU High Court of Justice…and if they loose there, the EU Courts could/should be able to ban them from doing this practice in all EU countries, including here in the UK.

    And the best thing of all…if this does happen, Scumbag O’Riley can’t have a hissy fit and threaten to withdraw from all the countries in which this ruling would be implemented because he’d be left with an awful lot of planes, but hardly any passengers, seeing as most of the countries he serves are EU members!:D

    in reply to: Ryanair loses court case #508454
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Last year my wife was returning from Norway and tried to get online to book in and print out her pass, due to ‘technical issues’ with the site she couldn’t.

    She was told at check in by the nice lady (not Ryan Air staff) that this isn’t uncommon practice by Ryan Air in order to raise more revenue, they also waived the fees.

    I am glad that the lady waived the fee…they [Ryanair] can’t say “you must check-in online or you will get charged £x’s to do it at the airport” if/when their website is down for “technical reasons”, as it would be illegal for them to do this.

    It does make you wonder though how many people will have fallen victim to this scam when it has happened?

    in reply to: The Rekkof saga has ended (welcome NG Aircraft!) #508456
    cloud_9
    Participant

    Nice aircraft, and nice looking website.

    Is there not already enough competition in the regional aircraft market from the likes of Bombardier and Embraer though?

    Will be interesting to see if anyone places any orders, anyone have any ideas as to who might be tempted?

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 2,135 total)