RE: Dubai Jet Provost
Steve – I have an idea ! The identity I am sure might well be in the forthcoming W&R ! She hasn’t been out there long. I just cannot remember her identity off the top of my head
RE: Did TFC ever swap that Hurricane?
I can imagine that the cost of it isn’t much of a worry. Both of the parties involved are millionaire’s I guess and the Nimrod compared to the effort of rebuilding a Bristol Beaufighter is a minor detail.
RE: P-51D
Kenneth – it’s worth noting that painting the Mustang to advertise a
grocery chain probably paid for her to fly for a year. Various warbirds have benefitted from a sponsor to keep them in the air (Sally B -FlyPast !) so I am all in favour of it !
RE: Whereabouts S.A.I. KZ-VIII G-AYKZ?
She is still believed to be in storage at R.A.F Cosford with the rest of his collection of aircraft. I too like the machine – pity she is a ‘hanger queen’ !
RE: Ashley is the New P51 at Duxford yet?
I think you will find she is 44-63864 SE-BKG . She flew from Duxford with the 78th Fighter group. She finished the war coded HL-W with the name TWILIGHT TEAR. Welcome home !
RE: Did TFC ever swap that Hurricane?
Sadsack – Compare how many RR Kestrel engine’s that are running to the number of Merlin engines and you have your answer. The Merlin has extensively developed and used well into the 1960’s by the military
whereas the Kestrels were mostly out of service in the early 1940’s.
The actual engine in that machine was restored by Vintec and apart from a mod that needed to be carried out to the carburettor which was researched in the PRO (how many engine fitter’s are alive who remember these engines!) the have been no problems with it apart from the usual running in symptoms.
Bearing in mind that this aircraft is going to be used in air display’s why rush the job rather than get it right first time?
RE: Yorkshire Air museum
It’s a bit like trying something new – you either like it or not .
If you pick up one of the many aircraft museum guides they will tell you what’s there and you can make your own mind up.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
The report which I have just viewed is open to interpretation. Certainly the ground was a factor at the point where it nosed over but the other factors of the landing are as important.
Regards the roll over protection if you read the report in depth
the fuselage actually structurally failed aft of the cockpit which allowed the canopy to be broken. It’s an incredibly sad fact I feel that life was extinguished very quickly during the accident with the aircraft sinking into the ground as such not being a factor.
It’s always going to be speculation but I remember an incident a few years ago involving a warbird which had a roll frame which turned over – the pilot survived for a considerable while before he ran out of oxygen. I am all in favour of retaining any feature that has been
designed into the aircraft as a means of pilot protection.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
Munnst – I fairness to both accident’s the point I made was that humans make mistakes . You cannot I feel though be analytical regarding one incident and then state that another incident was due to the runway and bad luck. What exactly is bad luck?
It’s worth noting that the pilot is in command of the machine not the other way around. If it ever gets to the stage where
there is an element of doubt it’s best for the pilot to leave it in the hanger and come back another day.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
Moggy – the crash in the U.S was a fatal incident. The lack of seat armour meant that the was little protection for the pilot in a similar way to the Sywell Sea Fury.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
I have seen photographs taken after the crash at Sywell and quag doesn’t mean anything. The surface although wet was usable – look more closely at where the aircraft first touched down for reasons for it not stopping.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
The debate is of course useful but the other side of the coin is that the findings really only have a direct impact on people who hold a DA
in the U.K and obviously whatever is requied abroad for airdisplay participation.
I read a post a couple of days ago a post relating to the accident at Sywell which infered that it might not have happened if they had a hard runway there. The fact that a very similar incident had happened in Florida on a hard runway was obviously lost in the clamour for something or someone to blame.
I think in this case and indeed in the example of the P-38 at Duxford it’s best to examine the evidence your self of which the is plenty and make an informed opinion. By all means share that opinion but in this situation I feel that the vast majority of people will be quite happy to accept the findings of the AAIB and just remember a fine pilot and machine.
RE: Kingcobra crash at Biggin Hill last year
Munnst- Your best course of action is to examine the flight characteristic’s of types like the Kingcobra and the Lockheed Lightning. These machines do have large reserves of engine power that can be used to enter and exit manouvers but it’s also a fact of life that the ground doesn’t move up ! Simply the is an element of risk in any manouver and using display criteria height’s for exits from manouvers doesn’t allow much margin for error.
Regards your comment’s on why a professional pilot should loose control twice – that’s very much a case of why do humans make error’s which are obvious to everyone else but not the person involved. During my time in the R.A.F the was a case where a station commander flew a perfectly serviceable aircraft into the ground-another where an aircraft was abandoned over hostile territory and the pilot had to be rescued by CAS because he made the wrong switch selection .
Unfortunately the Kingcobra didn’t have any means of cockpit data recording otherwise we would have a better idea of what went on in the final moments.
It’s worth noting also that although we havn’t had any serious display crowd injuries in the last 40 years – the fact that we have
lost a number of fine pilot’s in that time does tend to indicate that the are still measures that can be taken in terms of aircrew currency
and training. The aerobatic loops and barrel rolls do have an element of risk and one of my memories will always be the A-26 going in at Biggin Hill inverted – If I didn’t see another low level loop
at a display it wouldn’t bother me one bit .
RE: Look out in Spain !
I suggest if it’s his property you are on he is within his rights although most solicitor’s would suggest that these restrictions should be notified in the form of a sign beforehand .
RE: Wessex V’s
Sounds like the retirement flypast of the RAF Wessex HC.2 from service in the U.K. The Wessex HU.5C was retired in the 1990’s from R.A.F service and earlier from R.N service.