dark light

David J Burke

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spit in sea off Cyprus… Comments? #2119295
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Spit in sea off Cyprus.

    Interesting story – regards the RAF Association they do not have any influence on what should happen with war graves. That is the job of the Commonwealth War Graves Commisssion – the RAFA is a support organisation for both serving and former members of the RAF and their dependent’s.

    in reply to: Supermarine Swift up for grabs… #2119462
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Supermarine Swift

    The Draken is a completely different issue. Thsi machine was being operated by a quasi-military operation in the country of her former operator. As you have probably noticed she hasn’t been airworthy for a number of years now.
    The afterburner question is one of the complexity and safety of the particular type of aircraft. How the CAA calculate this is the
    accident rate per thousands of hours and indeed what happens when the engine stops i.e does it have a ram air turbine which can supply limited hydraulic function or does it have dual systems which allow
    an element of redundancy .
    I cannot comment on the standards to which the South African CAA
    operate but it’s worthy bearing in mind that the is a vast amount of ‘free’ airspace in which you can operate these machines and also the weather tends to be more favourable than the U.K.
    Regarding Mr Pover – Barry operated Hawker Hunter’s in the U.K for a number of years so I guess the decision to move to SA was his decision and not entirely related to the operation of military jets.
    Most jet aircraft which operate in the U.K are flown for either public displays or for sydicate operation – the Swift could not realistically be operated in either of these categories in the U.K.
    If the is no real interest in booking the superb Meteor F.8
    for U.K airdisplays what chance would a Swift have? None.

    in reply to: Catalina #2119477
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Catalina

    The former Greenpeace machine wouldn’t require a vast amount of work
    to return her to fairly ‘stock’ condition. She has her original fin
    and engine configuration and I am sure with some further work she could be returned to wartime guise.
    Regards a latter thread the North Weald example is for sale but the difference in the asking prices of it and the Greenpeace machine
    was considerable .

    in reply to: Thunder city colours #2119479
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Thunder city colours

    Probably because the machines are not flown as military machines anymore rather as private owner machines and I suppose after the amount of money they have invested in them they feel that they can paint them any colour they like which is fair enough !

    in reply to: Supermarine Swift up for grabs… #2119566
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Supermarine Swift up for grab

    I don’t think the CAA are totally intractable regarding afterburners – after all the OFMC at Duxford have-had a MIG-17 on the British register and I don’t think Mike Carlton would have acquired her in the first place if the CAA would not allow her on a permit to fly.
    The main problem in most people’s eyes is who in the public knows what a Swift is and how many really care?
    Hawker Hunter’s are available at realistic prices and have the option of two seats so if you want to tear around the countryside
    at a fast rate of knots at least two people can enjoy the sound of that 600 gallons of fuel burning rather than one person in a Swift wondering about what happens when a PFCU goes wrong and the is no spares back up.
    The comments regarding the CAA are not really bore out in reality – it’s lovely to say arn’t they terrible for not allowing
    these aircraft to fly but the reality of it is that these aircraft make a nasty mess when they come down so they wisely try and keep them in the hands of responsible operators who appreciate the seriousness of what they are doing.

    in reply to: Duxfords new arrivals! #2119569
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Duxfords new arrivals!

    Sad to say but I am sure the is only one in existance(at Pima) – certainly on dry land so I would say no chance!

    in reply to: Catalina #2119575
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Catalina

    That’s not strictly true – the Greenpeace machine was available at a price which they could not refuse. Along with the aircraft was a comprehensive spares package which can be utilized to help in the rebuild of G-BLSC as she was before she adopted the Bermudan register.
    The Greenpeace machine can operate as a crew trainer and as such when the unfortunate original ‘Killer Cat’ is airworthy again they can make a decision on what way forward – speaking for myself I have never been a particular ‘fan’ of the Super Cat mods and would much rather they retain the Greenpeace machine and let ‘Killer Cat’ go home to the ‘states’.
    As regards Plane Sailing I am curious as to how much interest the is in seeing more than one Catalina on the airshow circuit in the U.K.

    in reply to: Picture of the day 16/12/01 #2119578
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Picture of the day 16/12/01

    I am sure she waws flying during the summer – certainly she was up the weekend before Flying Legends.

    in reply to: Duxfords new arrivals! #2119693
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Duxfords new arrivals!

    Duxford has got a Buccaneer-it arrived from Coningsby at least two years ago.

    in reply to: Duxfords new arrivals! #2119804
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Duxfords new arrivals!

    Try the Oldprops website- we are talking roughly from memory about 20 worlwide tops!

    in reply to: F4U-4 to be rebuilt #2119833
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: F4U-4 to be rebuilt

    Regards the Buchon the is no particular problem with the type. They just seem to suffer more than their fair share of accident’s.
    As such in Spanish service they were used as fighters and didn’t as such carry out directly the same type of flying as is the case of a private owner machine.

    in reply to: Picture of the Day 11/12/01 #2119986
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Picture of the Day 11/12/01

    I don’t think the is a strict definition of what represents a ‘warbird’ anywhere. It’s a generic term which can apply to a large number of aircraft or equally a small number depending on your quarms.
    I for one believe the Bristol Freighter to be a ‘warbird’ if she is ex-military but few others would I am sure. It also brings in types like the Cessna T-41 Mescalero (172) which was used by the USAF
    in the ‘states’.
    The is no hard or fast rule – call it whatever you like (the Buccaneer) but I am sure you are preaching to a converted congregation already! She must be a ‘warbird’ !

    in reply to: F4U-4 to be rebuilt #2120020
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: F4U-4 to be rebuilt

    In other words build a ‘new’ Corsair looking at the extent of the damage.

    in reply to: Duxfords new arrivals! #2120099
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Duxfords new arrivals!

    Ant – The is an example flying with Hawkair at Terrace in British Columbia. They also operate a Carvair. Most have ended up in Australia and New Zealand as they were some of the last places that they were operated in. It’s completely down to the apathy of British
    museums that we don’t have on in the U.K.

    in reply to: Duxfords new arrivals! #2120105
    David J Burke
    Participant

    RE: Duxfords new arrivals!

    She had been based in the U.K for about a year – at various stages operating out of Heathrow and Enstone. She is sadly missed – it’s about time we had a replacement either airworthy or not!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 147 total)