I deal with RADON all day every day at work.
More information can be obtained from the National Radiological Protection Board, however in Northamptonshire we are a RADON hot spot. The Museum has been tested for RADON and we are below the action level. (I knows me onions on this). More info at http://www.nrpb.org.
RADON is ONLY harmful if above the action level, contained and not vented, hence the use of RADON sumps.
RADON is tasteless, invisible and NOT immediately harmful continued exposure can pose a risk if no proper ventilation and at high levels. Children are at greater risk, i believe due to their lesser bone density.
Hope that answers the point
Cheers then
TT
hey wait a minute.. u mean that when I was there with u I had a good sniff of RADON too?? oh well.. :rolleyes:
that’s nice really! 🙂
Alex
..u can trust ben chaps, he sleeps with a Harvard panel over his head and they both glow in the dark 😀
Alex
I guess I’d be happy with one of these 🙂
Alex
they are guys, no questioning, and even when in doubt.. well dont play too much with them!
Alex
the film accidents in 12 o’ clock high were mainly true wartime b&w footage I guess..
As per other movies with crash landings, Air America is a good example, then Flight of the Phoenix and .. I can’t think of others but I’m sure there are… uh, wasnt there even a movie with B-25s where they scrapped a couple?
Alex
did they fill the A-10 cannon barrels with lead? I have somewhere a pic of me sticking a finger in it when it was on the ground and I still remember the feeling..
Alex
Lynn do u have any idea of the engine TBO?
Any chance to invite the operators on this board? 🙂
Alex
I hope my adfirmations were taken under the proper point of view: my thought is about doing all these operations under the maximum level of safety, expecially for such rare and historically valuable machine.
About the props, I know the original VDM were carved out of an aluminium block and that the technology to redo it today (assuming u have the original scaled drawings or a prop blade as template) is not THAT expensive (expecially if u r facing a Me109 restoration), but the point is how much cheaper is a composite repro?
Alex
I have to agree with the guys here, the show was surely heart-stopping, but managed in a pretty unsafe way..
Apart for the direction of the aircraft facing the hangar (which allow me to say is insane..), the best thing to do when making a static max RPM test is holding the tail down by wiring it thru the lift holes, while from your description it would have been easy for the plane to jump the tiny chocks and ram inside the hangar. Needless to say a braking of the pilot might have produced a tail up..
Another thing, was there a man with a fire exstinguisher?
Now a technical question: why using a composite propeller instead of a conventional one? Just a matter of money or what?
A+ to the restoration 🙂
F- to the safety measures 🙁
Cheers
Alex
great! Thanks Alex, but we want them BIGGER!!! 😀
Alex
benny boy, u turned a funny topic in something boring, how u do dat? :rolleyes: 😀
Alex
…my “please guys give it a cut” post has disappeared too.. It would be kind if u mods, other than erasing, would drop a private message to explain the reason why, as a matter of politeness..
Alex
Now who would spend $ 229k for a Wirraway replica when for $215k u can get a TBM-3U with combat records??
Alex
ahahahhahaahahhaha I was going to post if for you philip!! 😀 😀 😀
Alex