dark light

crow11

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 243 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The PAK-FA News, Pics & Debate Thread XXIV #2230933
    crow11
    Participant

    Much like with women, I prefer this angle of the PAK-FA the most:

    haha good one!

    Time line of PAKFA based on su30 chart

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234785[/ATTACH]

    larger version, cant upload for some reason..
    http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2015/023/7/e/su50_pakfa_timeline_by_bbb4445-d8f2wlc.jpg

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2231230
    crow11
    Participant

    You got some evidence to support that malarkey?

    sorry mate i dont want to add fuel to the fire and “get banned” i like this forum, do some research if your interested u will find lots of info 🙂 sorry once again

    Hi All,
    Sanem,TomcatVIP,Crow11,RadDisconnect,
    I am following the Ukraine conflict through youtube …
    Geoff.

    so once again take my opinion but you have to do your own research. from what ive seen via military forums, youtube, live leak and live news- those convoys are mainly trophy vehicles that they captured during the first months and on and on, just yesterday and before yesterday they got all kind of arty supplies, tanks and etc from the abandoned Ukrainian position. so all those convoys you see are old weapons from ukraine, the EOSE or whatever they are called are watching the border, ukraine- russian border is probably close to most wathed border by now

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 14 #2231910
    crow11
    Participant

    Nice graphic, only in Russian unfortunately.

    i translated it for you as best as i could 🙂 hope this helps

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234726[/ATTACH]

    a little bigger and allot sharper version
    http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs71/f/2015/021/b/5/su_30_history_by_bbb4445-d8etjw9.jpg

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2233469
    crow11
    Participant

    Hi All,
    Can anybody help explain why the Ukraine AF has not obliterated all this so called Russian armament convoys within it’s borders please In some cases miles inside Ukraine apparently ? I do not understand why when they have the ground attack capability these convoys have not been decimated, they all seem to be traveling at a slow pace with vehicles in the tens rather than the odd five or six, to my mind this is all now propaganda if it isn’t there is more going on in this war than is being told.
    Could it be that if the UKAF did attack it would mean Russia would be given an excuse to retaliate officially declaring war on Ukraine or is it that is the reason these military armoured convoys are being left unhindered ? And yes I realise as they say the first casualty in war is the truth none the less my question still stands. :confused:

    Geoff.

    well first off they are volunteers and Ukrainian ex-berkut members- although many died in the “first days.” I do know for a fact that no one forces the russian veterans to go to Ukraine- its just they either have family there or were born there. i know of many people who did not yet get their red specnaz barrettes and dropped out and left for Ukraine. Many of those are in high up command positions. others like the Chechen people there follow Kadirov and they simply remember how the cia was giving money to the chechens to fight against Russians during the Chechen wars- so they are there because of their past. there have been rumors of GRU there – which i would not be surprised. Hence why the “batman” commander was one of the first to start gathering militia (a bat is the main part of the logo for GRU)

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234630[/ATTACH]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Intelligence_Directorate_%28Russia%29

    i also know that now there are allot of shoulder mounted AA and strelas which are more then capable of shooting down low flying attack planes- so i think that strategically ukraine is making the right choice of not flying missions in that area

    there has been only 1 chase of a convoy or 3 bmps crossing the border. none since then. if ur talking about the aid convoys- they are being checked by osce and ukrainians before entering

    chechens and why they are there sorry not in eng (battalion of the “wild one”)

    in reply to: Ukraine / Russia dispute aviation thread #2233982
    crow11
    Participant

    My Simple Words

    One is government other is foreign Sanctioned Fighters against the Government . So Government vs Armed Civilians known as Terrorists

    i agree with TR1 and toocool,

    if you go with Kyiv’s (parashenkos) reasoning, then jordan, israel,US, S. A. and quatar are training terrorists and sending instructors to aid terrorists in syria fighting against a legetamate Syrian gov and army

    in reply to: Frankenplane Prototypes #2234503
    crow11
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234556[/ATTACH]

    my attempt at making pakda from a mig 23

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2235957
    crow11
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234463[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2237833
    crow11
    Participant

    that is very cool

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2238636
    crow11
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234372[/ATTACH]

    one of my fav. Su 24

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2239181
    crow11
    Participant

    Sonic boom +f18

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2243699
    crow11
    Participant

    Sorry, but “will” be is the most widely used word in regard to Russian aircraft developments since years and with the current economical crisis in mind I’m more than skeptical about these “will bes” ! The same with the “will be” MiG-31 successor, the large UAVs, …. and the new aircraft carrier ! They all “will be” …

    Deino

    dont give up on them so easy, ruble is stabilizing, and putin is still pushing hard for modernization. China is there to help so have no fear 🙂

    in reply to: RuAF News and Development Thread part 13 #2243702
    crow11
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]234185[/ATTACH]

    i dont know if you guys remember the su25 that i photoshoped to be a 5th gen CAS?

    well apparently there has been an entirely new craft in development to replace the su25 since 2012 called (ПСШ) перспективным самолетом-штурмовиком or “Шершень-ЭП”
    here is the whole article

    https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/114570337243055135227/photos/102549610567855022047/albums/6097933326642936209/6097933332098038418?pid=6097933332098038418&oid=102549610567855022047

    sorry its in russian, but apparently it will be very low observable and will come into the VVS in 2020. there are also plans to incorporate it into squads with heavy unmanned drones that sukhoi is currently working on

    in reply to: Malasian MH17 thread II #2245816
    crow11
    Participant

    Funny that because as I remember it, Russia and Russian supported terrorists pretty much made sure that access to the site was delayed, watched closely and monitored very well, all AFTER the Russians had time to “sterilize” the site, remove incriminating evidence and plant others……don;t talk about Russia being the only ones looking…..Russia very well KNOWS who did it…they did…..putting the emphasis on others and diverting the blame is a game Moscow does very well…and has for decades, way back into the long dark days of the Cold War…..

    Much like you have ignored the bulk of my initial post and focused in on the Dutch NOT taking all the garbage and scraps……WHERE is the evidence?….any Air Force will have after action reports, loss reports of TWO SU -25’s occurring in the same area on the same date, mission planning forms, ordnance loading reports etc…..where is this all?

    oh boy! you have russophobia times 100!

    1. labeling – first off, there are no russian terrorists there, sure there are volunteer russian military vets, ex spetchnaz whatever else, sure there are GRU in ukraine at this moment (but ill give you a tin foil hat for that), if you say there are “russian terrorists” then american terrorists in syria, libya and ect- you will open a big can of worms, at least the rebels in ukraine did not rape the current president with a metal rod like the saudi trained american backed rebels did in libya

    2. Your version of the events is just like CNN, however the plane fell on the rebel territory, the rebels invited international community, UKRAINE started shelling the crash sight, i beg to question why? why specifically the crash sight, and ofcourse no one wanted to get killed during this from the international observers so its ukraine that wanted to delay everything.

    3. please let me know how you can “sterilize a crash sight”- the blk boxes were intact, the seals on them were intact, the wreck was still there, bodies still there.. so what is your reasoning?

    4. once again Russia did it – thats exactly what “they” wanted people to think BEFORE the facts were analyzed, once again ur just like the US media with psaki

    5. In any airforce? this is ukraine during a government coup, what records? are you kidding me? if they took all the radar data and the air controller, they could seal any records.

    in summery you are just not serious, do some research for a change – other then CNN and their comrades

    in reply to: Malasian MH17 thread II #2245823
    crow11
    Participant

    and really , WHY did the Dutch ONLY take the parts that showed evidence of damage / cause / effect?…..really?….perhaps you would have preferred them to vacuum the entire site and clean everything as well?……

    actually yes, you cant just pick and choose parts you want, what kind of evidence is that? you take everything, see the point is not “clean up” like you put it, its finding “the guy” responsible for this, and for some reason russia is the only one still looking – everyone else just classified things

    in reply to: Malasian MH17 thread II #2245907
    crow11
    Participant

    and witness doesnt mean alot without evidence, both side can easily hire people to do it, doesnt mean ****, the important thing is the evident on the airframe

    once again its ironic that the dutch took only the air frame pieces that they thought were “relevant to this case”

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 243 total)