dark light

Guzzineil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,015 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Disposable Camera – The original thread. #2101421
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    whoever is sending it on to me plse could they remember to Pm me first to get my current address… but don’t bother in mid Dec as i’m on my hols.

    Neil.

    in reply to: Canberra Spares #2110715
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    thanks for that i’ll pass on the suggestions and try to find out what its all about..

    in reply to: Dutch Mitchell collision, near Horsham, 8/6/44 #2110717
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    I seem to remember the West Sussex County Times doing a piece on this in the last couple of years.. may be worth contacting them..

    http://www.horshamtoday.co.uk/

    in reply to: Concord conspiracy theory #2111070
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    oh well suppose I’ll have my 3 pennoth worth on the subject..

    firstly take away the emotion of it all.. yes I totally agree that its a fabulous looking a/c a great technological achievement that was ‘invented’ 30 years ago.. a great British/French achievment etc etc..

    1) why hasn’t anyone built a replacement.. not because they can’t but because its not viable.

    2) why has it been taken out of service? because its a pain in the a**se for the support agencies and the airlines to support and operate. From a spares perspective you have a handful of unique a/c which are technologicaly a little bit ‘old hat’… basic maths shows that the more of an item you produce, the lower the cost and vice-versa… so supporting spares for the a small number of a/c isn’t viable for the suppliers,, and thats not just Airbus/Bae, and paying for them even less so for the operator.

    3) reliability/maintenance.. the a/c requires a huge amount of maintenance compared to modern aircraft.. I dont have the figures but I’m sure that the ratio of engineers and support staff to a/c would be horrendous compared to a 777 or Airbus… and that just adds to the operating cost

    4) due to the age of the a/c and the technolgy involved, they aren’t that reliable.. you could not run a single a/c operation with any sort of regularity… again look at the number of standby a/c on a modern a/c fleet… BA is seen as being over generous having 1 737 ‘spare’ to cover 30 a/c operating..most of the budget airlines run with no ‘stand-by’… Concorde normally had to have at least 1 back-up for every flight… you’d have 1 a/c in maint and then operate 3 services with 6 a/c… I know at times they may’ve upped the flying a bit but that was the general rule…. another prob with keeping one a/c is that it would spend a lot of time just parked-up which is the worst thing to do if you’re trying to keep an a/c, or any machine servicable.. seals dry out etc etc..

    5) despite the public statements about how long they planned to operate the a/c, the a/c has been a bit of a thorn in the side of the airlines and the decision by the manufacturers not to support the a/c gave AF/BA an easy way out…

    6) Branson to operate them? he’d face the same probs as above ref spares, costs, reliability etc plus the addit cost of setting up a support structure from scratch…. also following the way that he loves to court publicity, would you sell him one?? can’t you imagine the headlines the first time that he had a problem with it.. something along the lines of “BA stitched me up” I suspect..

    Please don’t think that I’m some sort of anti-Concorde bod.. I’ve flown on her, love the a/c, love the idea of it all, but the reality of it all isn’t so good…

    Neil.

    in reply to: another film query #2114147
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    good call Mike… had a look on a coupel of sites and I think you’re right.. can probably narrow it down to WB493 which had an Olympus engine on each side plus the a pair of Nenes in a nacelle… I thought the 6 engine layout in the film was a mock-up.. !! pictures and info at the site below…

    http://www.gsansom.demon.co.uk/vfaero/oneoff/vf11.htm

    thanks

    neil.

    in reply to: General Discussion #388431
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    or perhaps a stuffed Goat could be the answer.. either as a sustitute for the cat or to scare it off from chasing the birds..

    so Snapper, where would one purchase such a thing??!!!:D

    in reply to: Mieow ! #1970401
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    or perhaps a stuffed Goat could be the answer.. either as a sustitute for the cat or to scare it off from chasing the birds..

    so Snapper, where would one purchase such a thing??!!!:D

    in reply to: Concorde #2114291
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    its a pity this forum wasnt around ‘back then’.. we could’ve had a whip round and bought a TSR-2 between us! that may’ve saved the industry!!! 😀

    in reply to: So whats everyones favourite Air events of 2003?? #2114301
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    it was the Noratlas that was atempting to land on its nose!!!:D

    in reply to: General Discussion #388462
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    thanks all for your advice!

    I think Kenneth is right about decidign on one or the other… perhaps I’ll just carry on going over to see my nephews and making a fuss of their cat !!

    Neil.

    in reply to: Mieow ! #1970424
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    thanks all for your advice!

    I think Kenneth is right about decidign on one or the other… perhaps I’ll just carry on going over to see my nephews and making a fuss of their cat !!

    Neil.

    in reply to: So whats everyones favourite Air events of 2003?? #2114306
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    my favorite ‘air event’ was the flight I took in the Dragon Rapide at the Coventry show this year.. like sitting in a transit minibus with wings !!!:D

    2nd favorite ‘event’ was the week in the run up to the RAF display authorisation when the BBMF (especially the Lancaster) were flying twice a day at Coningsby practising their routines.. the weather was good and a free airshow is always welcome when it coincides with my days-off!!

    as for shows, I was going to put Coventry ahead of Legends but on reflection Legends made up for it with the mass Spitfire take-off and tail chase..

    Neil.

    in reply to: Concorde #2114316
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    hmm perhaps BA should’ve just done the same as AF and made the announcement that they were going to stop flying it and end it soon after without giving time for the ‘experts’ to winge on…

    national disgrace?? the real national disgrace is that ‘we’ allowed our aviation manufacturing industry to basically die post Concorde instead of building on that achievment as Airbus Ind have..

    so if we’re going to campaign for Concorde to be kept in service past its sell-by date, then are we also going to insist that Virgin operate Steam Trains on their mainline services.. we’d all prefer that to those nasty modern efficent trains now wouldn’t we..

    by the way, I do agree that the allocation policy for the airframes is a bit odd.. seems to have been dealt with by the Communications Director… send your comments to him c/o the BA Website!

    Neil.

    in reply to: Flugwerk #2114471
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    Yes I wondered what the problem is with these… as these are up-front ‘new builds’ rather than ‘restorations’ I’d have thourght that the CAA would’ve been happier as with the certification process, history etc… wouldn’t a ‘new build’ warbird have to be constructed to the same regulations as a new light aircraft, or perhaps more relevantly a ‘homebuild’ ?? I’m no expert in this, just trying to read between the lines…

    Neil.

    in reply to: Airspace #2115375
    Guzzineil
    Participant

    yeah and even a big kid like me got a big kick from climbing in to the cockpit of the Vulcan at Newark…

Viewing 15 posts - 901 through 915 (of 1,015 total)