dark light

Lee Howard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wildcat remains #1158444
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    The Gannet was XA459.

    The Wildcat at Portsmouth was last seen atop a pile of other aircraft remnants in the Sale Pound (scrap dump) at RNAY Fleetlands in November 1963. It had gone by January 1964, we know not where….

    in reply to: Aeroventure Whirlwind HAR.1 – REQUEST PLEASE #1157240
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Replied.

    Question still stands – anyone involved in XA870, please cometh forward!:)

    in reply to: Aeroventure Whirlwind HAR.1 – REQUEST PLEASE #1156996
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Thanks to everyone who responded. I’ve been in touch with Alan this evening and he’s been more than helpful with my request.

    Cheers

    Lee

    in reply to: Clinging to life at Predannack #1146854
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    KN

    PM sent.

    Lee

    in reply to: 728 Naval Air Squadron #1134010
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    ..expensive..

    I prefer “value for money”…

    …so try your library.

    I think you mean try the Air-Britain online shop, don’t you? ;):D

    in reply to: Home needed for dH Drover #785230
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Just a reminder that Geoff Goodall, whose site is mentioned in this thread, also recently wrote a book on the Drover published by Air-Britain: https://www.air-britain.co.uk/actbooks/acatalog/Drover.html

    in reply to: Sea Hawk WN108 #791418
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Sadly Alistair passed away last year.

    in reply to: DH Comet 1 Prototype #791424
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    The nose-less fuselage is almost certainly G-ALVG. Very sad to think that this most significant airframe wasn’t preserved when its rival, the Boeing 707 prototype, managed a better fate.

    in reply to: Another Uk Swordfish #787455
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Engine issues aside, being one of the ex-Simmons aircraft that spent years outside it will be interesting to see if it has the same spar problems that affected W5856, LS326 and NF389 (the latter two having been kept indoors all their lives). If so, that’s going to require some very expensive and specialised re-work.

    in reply to: Royal Navy Historic Flight Stands Down #805446
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    IThen there’s no money to repair the Sea Hawks exhaust system, so she gets sent away for storage…..Then what happened to the 3rd Swordfish???

    I think you’ll find there was nothing wrong with the Sea Hawk’s ‘exhaust system’ at the time she was (rightly) sent for proper storage pending a decision on her future.

    And ‘the 3rd Swordfish’ is NF389. Over the years she has provided much needed spares for the other two aircraft and indeed her wings are currently fitted to W5856.

    There are many positives in the aircraft being transferred to the G-reg under PtF rules. Rather than complain about it and the lack of funding, why not pledge your support and do your bit to keep these unique aircraft flying? Just a thought….

    in reply to: Wessex HC2 #815385
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Nearly all of the SAR and SH Wessex were flown to Fleetlands for storage between 1996 and 1998 (I was there) with some (including the 2 FTS aircraft and finally the 84 Sqn aircraft) to Shawbury up to 2003. There was never any intentions to reactivate them as far as I know. XR498 went to Shawbury while XR528 went direct to St.Mawgan as a GI airframe. St.Mawgan had a penchant for painting their GI airframes yellow, such as ex-RN Sea King XV709.

    in reply to: Sea Heron designation #822718
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Viscount

    Ref Devon C.2/2: the conversion to Gipsy Queen 70 Mk.3 (equivalent of the civil Dove Mk.8) was done in two phases: Phase 1 was the introduction of the new engines, while Phase 2 was the replacement of the canopy with a Heron canopy, giving the distinctive raised profile. But in all of the official DH paperwork, the designation ‘C.Mk.2/2’ never appears. They were only ever referenced as ‘C.Mk.2’. It is someone’s corruption of the phases of modification, but that in itself does not lead to an official designation and therefore should not be quoted. It is, however, far more accurate to identify them as ‘C.Mk.1’ (original), ‘C.Mk.2 Phase 1’ (engine mod) and ‘C.Mk.2 Phase 2’ (engine and canopy mods).

    My explanation, which will hopefully appear in the book whenever it gets completed, should give much more information.

    in reply to: Sea Heron designation #822720
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Viscount

    The Air-Britain monograph is a) out of date, and b) wrong. The book is currently being re-worked (extensively) I did some of the work on it and have corrected this, as well as the long-held belief that RAF Devons became ‘C.2/2’ (never an official designation – one which was made up by spotters)

    As I said in my previous post, the OFFICIAL documentation (including Pilots Notes and Flight Reference Cards) clearly shows SEA HERON C.Mk.1. Trevor Stone was right on that. Only the Sea Devons were C.Mk.20.

    in reply to: Sea Heron designation #822811
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    The proper designation for XR441 to XR445 was C.Mk.1. There was one C.Mk.4 (XM296) and one CC.Mk.4 (XR391, ex-Queen’s Flight). As per the Pilot’s Notes. Thetford got confused with the Sea Devons which were C.Mk.20s (with the exception of one ex-RAF C.Mk.2 – often, and erroneously – referred to as a ‘C.2/2’). No other variations need be profferred!

    in reply to: Earl's Court Sea Vixens #831808
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    There were four ‘Vixettes’ which were made for the Royal Tournament from unidentified Sea Venoms dumped at Abbotsinch. All were taxiable. One was later mounted above the perimeter wall at Lee-on-Solent to advertise Air Day, but the final fates are, like their origins, unknown.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 639 total)