dark light

Lee Howard

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 639 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fairey Swordfish serial number #1101630
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Olly

    Swordfish II NF135 816 Sqn Chaser (‘F’), sank U-366 71 degrees 10 mins N, 14 degrees 45 mins E, 5.3.44 (Sub Lt JF Mason & Sub Lt D Street both awarded DSC and Leading Airman DG Franklin awarded DSM).

    Do you happen to have your Grandfather’s logbooks still?

    Rgds

    Lee

    in reply to: 275 Sqn Sycamores #1117635
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Nigel

    I can’t find anything for 275 Sqn as yet, but do have this one of XE317 taken at RAF Ballykelly in February 1961 with 118 Sqn.

    I presume you know that XE317 was coded ‘J’ with 275?

    Lee

    in reply to: Scrapping the Nimrods at Woodford #1143169
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Aerial footage of the carnage beginning. The lack of sound sort of adds to the sombre scene:

    http://www.itv.com/granada/nimrod-scrapped94053/

    Shameful waste.

    in reply to: Phantom XV586 To Yeovilton #1107049
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    :rolleyes: I wondered when this would finally get out. :rolleyes: As Seaking93 says, too many people jumping the gun and assuming incorrectly.

    Besides, it’s not happened yet.

    in reply to: Phil Butler (Air Britain) #1125432
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    I’ve passed your message on to him.

    Lee

    in reply to: Mosquito W4050 Conservation thread #1135482
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Shall we all raise a glass to Bill Baird?

    Moggy

    Hear hear!

    Blimey, is it really 20 years since the 50th Anniversary at Salisbury Hall?!:eek: I have video somewhere that my Dad took on that occasion with the Comet Racer and Mosquito giving a short display in the overhead (and Desmond Penrose in the Arrow Active, IIRC). Those were the days!:)

    in reply to: Seafire population + 1 #1139873
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    880

    You don’t say what the sources of your ‘production details’ are?

    It won’t be SW2_5 as there was no such batch. The third production batch of Seafire F.XVs, however, began with SW781 and therefore the only two possible contenders are SW785 and SW795. Of these only SW785 seems likely as there is little known about it (SW795, on the other hand, is known to have served exclusively in the UK). Having been delivered to 33 MU at RAF Lyneham in June 1945 it is next recorded being in store at Trincomalee in January 1946. This would fit in with it being possibly issued to 880 NAS for service in the 8th CAG aboard Implacable in the waters off Australia, the incident presumably being between June and September and leading to it being dropped off at Trincomalee when the carrier returned home soon after VJ Day.

    The other serials you mention can be fairly easily worked out, but it takes a bit of time and lateral thinking. You don’t mention what your father’s name was, and without that I can’t determine whether his logbook has ever been seen by the Fleet Air Arm Museum, but if not perhaps you might like to consider allowing them to borrow it for copying (or indeed submit a photocopy of it yourself for their records)? It is by interpretation of such documents that we have, over many years, managed to piece together the individual airframe histories for all Fleet Air Arm aircraft, and no matter how seemingly ‘routine’ many of the entries may appear, in the right hands they can unlock many hitherto unsolved details that might otherwise be lost to posterity.

    Lee

    in reply to: Seafire population + 1 #1140117
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    I believe the numbers on the sides of the fuselage were squadron numbers. I have a list of all Spitfires and Seafires ever produced and their histories, which gives the numbers PR, NN, etc, but there appears to be no relationship between those numbers, and the fuselage numbers.

    880

    The numbers are codes/callsigns. But down by the tail, beneath the ROYAL NAVY is the airframe serial. It is the serial I’m interested in, coupled with the code/callsign.

    I’m in the process of fully updating the Air-Britain book “Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939 to 1945” (probably the source you refer to) for reprinting in a few years’ time, and am always looking for photos such as these which help to fill gaps in our existing knowledge.

    To that end can you confirm what serial the aircraft marked ‘114/N’ is in the photo you posted, please?

    Lee

    in reply to: Seafire population + 1 #1140700
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Any chance you could also confirm from the photos what the aircraft serials are? I’ve just done a search through our records and can’t find an aircraft coded ‘114/N’ which means that, although we most probably have details of the incident shown in this particular photo, we don’t appear to have a serial/code tie-up – so often only achievable through contemporary photographs.

    Love to see the other photos!

    Lee

    in reply to: Lovely gaffe on BBC Points West today #1151058
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Oh dear. Will be watching avidly tonight – especially for any glimpses of the camera ship Lynx……;):D:D

    in reply to: HMS Eagle 1953 and 809 squadron #1090315
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    If you’re wanting to identify the Sea Hornet, it was VW959 (‘489/J’) which has starboard engine failure and landed at Keflavik on 1 September 1953. After removal of the AI radar equipment the airframe was left where it was; the work/cost involved in repatriating it was deemed to be incompatible with the remaining in-service life of the type.

    in reply to: Sea Fury VX281 #1146083
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    …any info Lee?

    The FNHT will make an announcement in due course, I’m sure.

    in reply to: North Weald Battle of Britain day. #535752
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Lee have the RNHF got a new chippy or just borrowed one :confused:

    No, it’s G-BARS, owned by John Beattie who flew the Nimrod in from Duxford.

    in reply to: North Weald Battle of Britain day. #535754
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    ‘APDK

    Thanks, and nice to (briefly) meet you on Sunday. Thought there might have been a few more pics of us floating around seeing how many were clicking away. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: North Weald Battle of Britain day. #536030
    Lee Howard
    Participant

    Wot, no pictures of the Chipmunk taxying in and out?:cool::D

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 639 total)