I’ve got a cut on my finger from the Seafire, and smudges of her oil on my carpet from last week if they count 😀
Please can we put this RUMOUR about G-CVIX joining RNHF to bed once and for all. It’s not helping anyone to keep speculating.
Swordfish – too easy lol
Peter
How fascinating. Checking the details on the BBC website withour own records I can confirm that the Avenger incident at Culham was with JZ622 (raised undercarriage instead of flaps on landing – hence “finger trouble”). Is there any chance you could transcribe the Fleet Air Arm types (type plus date) and send it to me so that I can make sure our FAA histories match in preparation for our revised reprint of Air-Britain’s FAA Aircraft 1939 to 1945″ which we’re in the process of working on at the moment? The Kingfisher note actually corrects what we already had.
Incidentally, “Lt Cdr Levers” was, in fact, Lt Cdr Ievers. An easy mistake to make.
Many thanks
Lee
Is there an chance that the RNHF aircraft will be restored, or was it completely destroyed when it crashed?
Completely destroyed. 🙁
‘Have you tried clicking the word “HERE” in the news item? That is the hyperlink. Failing that, type “Disposal Services Authority” into Google and follow the link from there.’
MoD office PC won’t always follow HERE or hyperlinks, yes even when it’s RAF or FAA content!
Not an issue with your post here, but difficult and unhelpful when someone posts, ‘have you seen this…’ and no explanation with it.BTW I have a fondness for the FAAHF loved their displays at VL and CU, and priviledged enough to have had tour around their hangar with John Beattie.
I think they missed some good opportunities in the past though, with an airworthy Sea Vixen and Gannet passing them by, but owning two Sea Furies and three Swordfish.
Hope they keep up the goodwork, and really enjoy seeing the Sea Fury and Sea Hawk displaying.
Testing it on an MoD PC now – works here.
Re “missed opportunities”, sadly Sea Vixens and Gannets are highly complex aircraft and thus demand a high manhour/flying hour ratio which inevitably means cost. This was one of the reasons why the Sea Hawk was not flown for many years as, despite it being a relatively basic jet, it still gobbles up manpower resources more than the other types. The Sea Harrier would have been even worse!
In an ideal world all such former FAA types would be retained, but it simply isn’t a viable option.
What resolution is your screen set to? I know sometimes people have problems like that if they have low-res settings or if they have their favourites bar opened along the side of the screen instead of using the drop-down menu from the top (which takes up an inordinate amount of the viewing area of the screen).
Thanks TT!
Ive raised this before, the ‘official’ ‘puter I use wont follow all links, its anoying when you read a post on the forum and cannot follow the link, maybe a little background info would be good in the post, especially some where there is no description at all, but just a link.
Have you tried clicking the word “HERE” in the news item? That is the hyperlink. Failing that, type “Disposal Services Authority” into Google and follow the link from there.
TT – thanks for the comments. I’ll make sure they get passed on.
The sale of VZ345 will hopefully free up much valuable funds for other RNHF requirements. Sadly, the fact is that VZ345 was never going to fly with RNHF without a significant amount of manpower and money – both of which are not in abundance! This is one of the reasons why she was used as a spares source for the restoration of VR930 ten years ago. Hopefully someone with the necessary financial and engineering means will snap her up and return her to her former glory. 🙂
Sadly this Air-Britain page has yet to catch up with our own book. As with all fixed-wing aircraft worked on by RNAY Fleetlands it had to land at Lee-on-Solent (it being the nearest airfield to the non-runway equipped Fleetlands). However, unlike most of the other Naval aircraft worked on by the Yard the ‘Prince had no folding wing facility which rendered it simply too wide to fit through the relatively narrow towing route. Therefore our entries for Sea Princes read “Lee-on-Solent on RNAY Fleetlands charge”.
A much more in-depth (and accurate) list of Sea Prince histories can be found in “Fleet Air Arm Fixed-Wing Aircraft since 1946”. [PLUG!]:D
The Culdrose Station Flight aircraft was always 999 regardless of the airframe
Not exactly true. CU St Flt operated many different types with codes in the 900-series, but not necessarily always ‘999/CU’. In fact, the only Sea Prince they operated with the code (‘999/CU’) was C.1 (short-nosed) variant WF137 which is now, sadly, rotting away at Lasham. The only other Sea Prince used, briefly, by Stn Flt was C.2 WM756 but which did not carry a Stn Flt code.
That is the squadron and individual aircraft identity code, a comprehensive list is in Putnums Fleet Air Arm Squadrons.
Think you actually mean Air-Britain (Historians) Ltd’s “Squadrons of the Fleet Air Arm” by Ray Sturtivant and Theo Ballance. Also try Air-Britain’s “Fleet Air Arm Fixed-Wing Aircraft since 1946” by Ray Sturtivant, Mick Burrow and……erm…..me! 😀
…… progress report of the T20?
……details on the website!
1. A Sea Fury will be flying this year.
2. The Chipmunk’s role isn’t as a display aircraft; however, with VR930 out of action last year she was pressed into service to at least provide some sort of display from RNHF, and it also gave the pilot some good display experience for this year when he will take up the controls of the Swordfish.
3. Culdrose will definitely feature on the display programme, although as ever the actual participation is dependent on aircraft serviecability and the unpredictable Cornish weather!
All news updates will continue to feature on the WEBSITE, and a provisional display season programme will hopefully be uploaded in a few weeks time.
Lee
Following on from Bruce’s comments, I too joined said same Museum just a year after him as a volunteer after a chance visit one Sunday with my Dad. Unfortunately family events intervened and I had to move further south just over a year later (albeit I still managed to hitch a lift back every now and then to keep working on the aircraft, and indeed often took bits back with me to do at home!).
However, that sowed the seed that led me, on leaving school, to successfully apply for a 4-year fully indentured aeronautical apprenticeship with the MoD – a much coveted thing in those days when, out of some 740 applicants only 25 were taken on. One entire year of hand skills training (mainly filing metal blocks to rediculous tolerances!), one year sheet metal and systems training and then two years on the shop floor eventually ended up with me becoming Bronze medalist at the MoD Apprentice of the Year competition out of 1,700 apprentices nationwide (….cough…blow own trumpet 😀 ). All that coupled with ONC and HNC day-release courses at the nearby college. And best of all, it paid! Not hugely, but it was better than nothing.
I also got involved with some more aircraft restoration at the same time – two aircraft that, funnily enough, eventually found their way to Cobham Hall, Yeovilton just a few hundred yards from where I now work. On the back of my apprenticeship I got a weekend job with a local company maintaining and restoring light and vintage aircraft which gave me the opportunity to try my hand at woodworking and fabric covering – I’ll always have the greatest admiration for those who can do that!! Though I certainly didn’t do it for the money (more for the experience) the intermittent nature of the payments that I was promised, increasingly bizarre behaviour of the owner finally put an end to that one. No experience is worth being made a mug of.
All that, and more, from a chance visit to a Museum!