Quite right – how could I get the serial wrong, considering the number of times I walk past it?! And yes, again, it was MDAP not LL. I can only blame a late night! But I disagree: it IS horrible. And inappropriate.
I’m not in ANY position of authority at all, so please don’t take my comments as being anything other than my own opinion. But I’ve never heard of any such suggestion, nor would I expect to. It was never intended to represent a wartime aircraft (other than the lamentable – in my opinion – decision many years ago to paint is as such); it is what it is: a post-war Avenger. But the crucial fact is that it is a Fleet Air Arm Avenger and not one just marked up as such. It represents all Fleet Air Arm variants of the type and those who flew and maintained it.
Dear me. I think many on this post need to go away and do some swotting up on FAA squadron history before posting comments and also stop listening to/repeating unsubstantiated tittle-tattle from un-named sources. Ref 849 NAS, the unit flew Avengers as part of the British Pacific Fleet in 1945, long before the concept of AEW. RNHF have three Swordfish, none of which are up for disposal. And the FAAM’s example, XB446, is the sole surviving original MDAP Fleet Air Arm Avenger – anywhere. It was a miracle that it survived long enough to be around when the Museum first opened.
Yes, the paint scheme is horrible; no it isn’t correct for the mark; yes I’d love to see it reverted back to its original Culdrose Station Flight markings. But be thankful in the meantime that it is still safely on display when so many other types had a less fortunate fate.
And as for ‘clueless museum curators’, don’t you think that comment is a bit harsh and un-warranted?
Unfortunately the shop range has been much reduced in recent times. Incidentally, can you PM me the details of where your aircraft is and where you got it from/dates? Thanks
…..(Sea Kings had an underside of 626 camouflage grey)
No they didn’t. The undersides were the same as the rest: BS381C-637 Medium Sea Grey, which is what the Lynx currently are.
More details on paint schemes in my Haynes books on both subjects.
Very sorry to hear this indeed. Patrick was a lovely guy who I first met when writing the Haynes Sea King Manual and indeed supplied me with some images for the forthcoming Lynx book too. He was a fount of knowledge, always happy to help and clearly very proud of the RRHT collection at Bristol that he helped to administer.
RIP Pat. Thoughts with his family and colleagues.
Lee
For those of you who aren’t yet aware, Patrick Hassell, Vice Chairman of the RR Heritage Trust, has died after suffering a sudden heart attack.
Pat has helped me immensely with information and guidance and his friendly manner and enthusiasm for the protection of aviation history, will be sorely missed.
My best wishes to all those at RRHT. The work that you all do is greatly appreciated by many individuals and groups around the world.
RIP Pat. You will be missed.
Graham
I think there are two wrecks at Yeovilton? There is one on the fire dump and the example that was at Montrose air station until fairly recently, which is the donor aircraft.
The one on the dump is WV911, owned by RNHF. Unfortunately it’s not just a case of going in and taking bits or even taking bits with permission. The aircraft is technically a MoD asset and as such would have to be disposed of via the DSA. The ex-Montrose example is owned by FAAM. Same applies.
Dave & Lee
I was merely expressing my own opinion as to the style of writing, and not the restoration abilities etc of those currently working on the aircraft.
One assumes that we are still allowed to express our own opinions etc on this forum ????.Bob T.
Of course you are! Just as I am allowed to express my view on your comment!:rolleyes:
Is it an urban myth (surely it must be!) that in the 1970s RAFM were offered a “Whirlwind cockpit” but turned it down because as the said item was situated at RNEC Manadon it was assumed that it was from a Whirlwind with rotary wings rather than a Whirlwind with fixed wings. The cockpit was subsequently burnt in a fire fighting demo on a families day
Urban. No evidence of a Whirlwind fighter being at Manadon. Plenty of other interesting stuff, but not that.
As well? I understood that they had Wildcat JV348 which departed around the end of 1963/start of 1964.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]244037[/ATTACH]
Then there was Sea Hornet VW949, in use for fire fighting practice at Westhampnett, West Sussex, until it was scrapped in 1968.
The Sea Hornet NF.21 was at the Civil Defence Yard at Westhampnett; the Wildcat was at the Portsmouth Civil Defence Yard. An acquaintance of mine used to be a member of HAPS and he was detailed off to investigate the Sea Hornet as it was near to him. He reported back that, in his opinion, it was beyond redemption……and it ended up being scrapped. I nearly lumped him one when he told me the story.
Great to hear of the progress, but I think that the Bluebird teams diary & fun approach to the progress reports was a much better style and read.
Bob T.
There’s no satisfying some people, is there! The standard of workmanship being shown here certainly sets the progress apart from anything else. So much for FAAM not having the expertise, skills or capacity…Proof of the pudding is in the eating, as they say :rolleyes:
I’m in favour of both the old (and new) photos and the various digressions leading from them. Talking of which, Sky is indeed the correct designation of the colour, however “Sky Type S” and “Duck Egg Blue” are not unwarranted inventions but the phrases used in the original official Air Ministry documentation. The “Type S” was not part of the official colour (as opposed to paint) definition, but unsurprisingly it stuck.
Sky is NOT Duck Egg Blue. Sky Type S is not the designator for the tint. You’re right in saying that ‘it stuck’, which was my point. But it doesn’t make it correct.
Correct! The Wyvern was never ‘white and darkish blue’, but was painted in Sky Type S (Duck Egg Green) with Dark Sea Grey top. I first photographed it in those colours outside the museum in March 1969 and it remained in those colours until the early ’90s when it was stripped to bare metal. The photos Robbo has posted is indeed in those colours and only looks ‘bluish’ due to the poor weather and type of film used.
Adrian
Not quite correct. For ‘Sky Type S’ please read ‘Sky’. And it isn’t ‘Duck Egg Green’ at all. They’re terms produced by urban myths and have been perpetuated over many years. And the top is Extra Dark Sea Grey, not Dark Sea Grey.
I noticed in your S-55/Whirlwind Warpaint, which Mick showed me his copy of the other day, that you’ve used these terms throughout. Also your paint specs are incorrectly referenced as BS.318C. They should read BS381C.
Likewise, the Whirlwind HAS.22s of 781 NAS (and the Sea Devons and the Wessex) were Grass Green, not Emerald Green (although at the time we wrote our FAA book we didn’t have that information, we’ve known for several years now). Compare the green of the drawings with the (very nice) colour image on the front and it will be quite clear.
There are also some errors with blues and RAF Blue Greys I noticed. And shades of dayglo (Red Orange, not Red). All detailed within the chapter on colour schemes and markings in FAAHS1943.
Xtangomike: Ref the Supermarine 510/517 debate, that was me on Facebook. Glad to see others have recognised the difference. And the Wyvern is Sky, not ‘Duck Egg Blue’…..!
Lee
Hi LH – was it the XS186 serials that you drew up (apologies, so many people have helped in so many different ways, I’ve lost track over the years), if you remind me I will ensure you get a thank you on our page!
Was indeed.
Are those the markings I drew up for you several years ago? Looks good.
Just a pity that some were quick to pass (negative) judgement at the time and others saw fit to jump on the bandwagon with little in the way of trustworthy facts.
Anyway…
Bruce – I’ll chat with the guys but I think a Dove nose wheel is wrong as its a Marstrand one (anti shimmy) unlike the Barracuda one (the one on the ‘missing’ tail oleo was perfect; the one that FAAM received back, which had left in one piece, was found to have been unceremonially put through a bandsaw…)