Simply this plane is a representation of the awesome russian know-how,stunning !
It confirms that the MiG-29 is not dead and with the planned modernizations is still has a great future in the RuAF.
A link for Ink and Serbmig (in russian) http://www.avia.ru/news/?id=1139399343
good they are modernizing at last.
Personnaly I think Serbia to control fully its airspace should acquire a few more Mig-29s (A dozen in total should be enough).
Nonsense,Belarus denies any plan to buy Indian jet fighters http://www.avia.ru/news/?id=1139236567 (in russian)
What is so extraordinary ?The pic is beautiful with the vextoring nozzles yeah but…
Indeed it is, which will be fatal in a war with the US or NATO, but not really an issue in the case of most border disputes, where 70s and 80s stuff is good enough.
Your response to these fairy tales is very good but I have to disagree on this point even hardware from the 80s (T-80Us,Mig-31s,Msta-S artillery,Smerch) can do a lot of damage to NATO the key is good command (Yugoslavia’s brilliant defensive tactics in Kosovo),anyway a war between the two would be suicidal for both sides don’t you think so ?
P.S. good they are upgrading the MiG-29s.
Yes right but the russians could soon have to use them…unfortunately.If you speak russian have a look at http://www.army.lv/?s=1286&id=3166
The fleet of 2013 seems pretty impressive if the plan goes ahead of course but the figure of 4 Antei IIs(Oscar 2) seems pretty low they should keep at least 7 of them knowing how effective these subs would be in a modern conflict.
Ah Okay,but still I’ve got doubts about the Severodvinsk subs,if only one is gonna be built it won’t make much difference.But we’ll see…
“Two uncompleted Akula at Komsomolsk are being completed to be leased to the Indian Navy , The one identified is Nerpa “
What a disgrace !!!Selling nuclear subs to the Indian Navy !!!I have nothing against the indians but it’s a shame for the russians !
How many according to you are there operationnal Schuka-B(Akula I and II ) operationnal as of today ?You seem to be well informed !
thanks I’ll continue the translation.Simple question:are you russian ?
My translation of the first page on the “Typhoon”
“In december 1972 “Rubin” Construction Bureau received from the Navy Command the task to develop new underwater carriers for new solid fuel Ballistic Missiles R-39.
The head ship TK-208 was laid on the June 30th 1976 and commissioned on November 12th 1981,the first R-39 Missile was fire-tested from her two weeks later(27.12.81).The last ship of this class(TK-20) was commissioned in september of the year 1989.After the signing of Soviet-US START II the building of the seventh ship was canceled in 1990,she was subsequently disassembled right at the shipyard.
28.500/33.800 tonnes ; 172,8×23,3×11,5 meters ; working depth 380 meters(limit depth 500 m);2 reactors OK-650;(power unit ???) 50.000 Hp ;twin screws ;
speed 12/25 knots.Armament :20 R-39 SLBM,four 650 mm & two 533 mm
nose torpedo launch tubes with payload of 22 torpedoes and rocket-torpedoes.
Air Defense: 8 “Iglas I” systems. Crew 179 sailors.Autonomy 120 days(180 according to other sources).
Thanks Maxpain !!A small question to you:Are all the six Akula IIs in service with the Russian Navy?I thaught that the “Gepard” was the last to have been commissioned(source:Voennoe delo NTV),but this source says that the last was “Rys K-333”.Could you clarify this please ?And do you know how many of the Project 971 “Akula Is” are still in service?thanks
Are there twelve or fourteen Akulas in service as of today?And could you tell me how many of them can be considered modern(improved ones) and comparable to LA class subs?thanks
Maybe if you can read russian you could find some information on http://www.submarine.id.ru
and http://www.deepstorm.ru.There seems to be quite a lot of info on the ShukaB/Akula and even a comparison between the “Akula” class subs and LA class.