Ah Sorry!The Severodvinsk is simply the name of the head ship of the “Yasen” class or “Granay” class according to NATO.

What’s new about the “Yasen” class ?Why we never hear anything about them ?What’s their status of completion ?Do they exist ?

So warfare.ru is wrong ?or what ?

http://www.warfare.ru/?linkid=1720&catid=243&pending=true
WHAT ?There are THREE Granays-Severodvinsk submarines being built today ?When is the first due to be commissioned ?or nobody knows ?(I know the russians are rather silent on their severodvinsks )
thanks

I’m not an expert but if Iran gets hundreds of Tors,Pantsyrs,Buks,S-300 coupled with high-tech radars can’t they at least inflict heavy losses on the USAF or USN in case of let’s say a major air war (eg:Kosovo) ?Because these systems seem pretty powerful too !
What do you think about that ?

About the Kursk

I have been searching for a long time about what caused the Kursk disaster and one day I stumbled on a french film,very interesting called “Le Koursk un sous-marin en eaux troubles” where the french expose a very interesting thesis on the Americans being responsible for the destruction of the Kursk after some kind of misunderstanding.The french claim that the submarine responsible is the “Toledo” (which was subsequently retired due to extensive damage incured in the collision prior to the torpedo lauch.
For those who are interested in this pretty convincing film you can find it on
e-mule file-sharing system(download it at http://www.emule-project.net)
,just type “Le Koursk:un sous-marin en eaux troubles” (in french) in english it more or less means:The Kursk:A submarine in muddy waters.
I repeat ,very interesting film,must see.