dark light

Cking

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 871 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: B.A Collection at Cosford #1314616
    Cking
    Participant

    Hmmm – ‘VM is the only true passenger ‘standard’ preserved I believe.

    The RAF examples will be highly ‘gutted’ ex tanker versions, and most (if not all now – are there any ‘Standards’ left?) of the RAF’s are ‘Super’s
    I don’t agree they’re better.

    To the average “Joe” there is no difference between a pax standard and a pax super, they see a VC-10. It is the same for the Trident, 1a,b,c,d,e 2a,b,c,d 3a,b,etc etc it’s a Trident. You cannot hope to keep examples of every mark and sub mark, perticularly the way the british aircraft industry messed around with it’s aircraft. I do not agree with the scrapping, I am just saying that the loss is not as great as the scrapping of the Hendon Beverley say.
    When I said the RAF 10’s were better I ment that they were more relevent to the RAFM and would have been looked after for the last twenty years because they were flyers. Also a few years ago didn’t the director of the RAFM say that they were not going to get an ex-RAF 10 because they had the BA one and they didn’t want to duplicate aircraft? I do remember that there was a bit of an uproar about that then.
    The other question that I want to ask is what is going to happen to the Neptune at Cosford? That has no conection with the RAF. The aircraft that were operated by the RAF bore no resembelance to the Dutch example on display(outside) so is that for the chop too? Lets face it an aircraft that spent all its working life at low level over the north sea and then spent twenty years outside proberbly has greater corrosion issues than the B.A. collection!
    Please don’t think I am trying to start an argument!. There is enough of that on this forum. I am just trying to add something to the disscussion of a sad event.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: B.A Collection at Cosford #1315138
    Cking
    Participant

    What is at issue here is that by announcing that “the BA Collection is on the move”, by saying “The airframe will be transported to East Fortune” the impression is given that the aircraft are being preserved. Actually they are being destroyed. The RAFM and BA are being untruthful. Had the truth of the matter been known earlier other interested parties might have been able to come up with an alternative plan, funds could have been raised etc.
    I’m not one of those who thinks that saving a cockpit has any relevance to aircraft preservation.

    There were rumours about this about a year ago and what museums would have been interested? Most museums have enough on their plate trying to keep corrosion at bay on the aircraft that they have. Also what is worth saving ?
    The arguments I keep hearing are:
    The 707, it’s only relevence is that it started the distruction of the British aircraft industry.
    The VC-10, there’s two preserved already and the RAF will be giving away (slightly) better examples soon.
    The Viscount, there’s two preserved already.
    The 1-11, there’s two preserved already (On a personal note, having worked on them that’s two too many!)
    The Trident, with the best will in the world there are three of them in captivity. (One of them superbly looked after by my good friend Tridentman).
    If the truth be know too, who went to Cosford to see the airliners? I see pictures of the York and the Lincoln and threads about getting the Vulcan under cover, but we all walked passed the airliners to see the interesting stuff!

    Rgds Cking
    P.S.I do tend to agree about cockpits, but thats a personal thing. I’d rather see the engines!!

    in reply to: :( #541766
    Cking
    Participant

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Lee
    Let me put it this way how many isles has an 763 got ?

    Two in one direction and four in another 🙂

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Row 13? #543974
    Cking
    Participant

    Hear at Manchester we don’t have a gate 13

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Photograph Poll – The Discussion #552323
    Cking
    Participant

    I like it as it is but there should be a “One thread per-airport-per day” rule. As for constuctive critcism of another posters pictures!!!!!! We can’t seem to have a constuctive conversation without it turning into a full scale slanging match! Imagine if somebody DARED to critique somebody elses pictures!!!!
    I must admit to falling into the “Cool pics” brigade as I think that if somebody has taken the trouble to take and post pictures somebody should reply. Imagine if they take an interesting picture and didn’t post because he though we were all rude?

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: B-24 or UFO? #1325194
    Cking
    Participant

    Is it the progamming cam from one of the turrets? (i.e. the bit that prevents the air gunners from shooting themselves down). I have no idear other than that. You might try the WIX forum as they have a resident turret man there.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Should airplanes be like golf balls? #569673
    Cking
    Participant

    Passengers want to fly direct. It the plane was like one of my golf balls they would only get to their destination after landing in the desert, bouncing off a few trees landing in the water and changing planes twice 🙂

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Bristol Hercules flying? #1333116
    Cking
    Participant

    This link
    http://aviation-safety.net/database/dblist.php?Type=494
    lists 32 Varsity accidents. I have heard that it’s engine out performance was a bit “marginal”. The fact that the pilot was trying to do a forced landing at a grass strip says that he was in deep trouble. At the time I thought that they had put the wrong type of fuel in it too. Very sad

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Middle engine placement #571202
    Cking
    Participant

    The No2 engine on both the Tripestar and the 10 were a pain in the A**e to do any maintenance on! Eaven topping the oil up was an epic.
    I was involved with a No2 engine change on a Tristar once. It required special docking, a special sling and a crane. It took an entire gang all night just to prepare it to drop! You can have a N01 or 2 down and up in a shift if you put your mind to it! As for doing one down route! They used to two engine ferry them back as a matter of course!
    They stripped the normal accessorys (Hyd pump IDG) off the KC-10’s No2 engine and put a second starter and start valve on instead. This improved it’s dispach reliability considerably down route. I think also that the parcel operators have done the same with the DC-10’s.Don’t know for sure though.
    It was not for nothing that they were known as “The three headed ulcers”!

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Air Jamacia @ MAN? #571408
    Cking
    Participant

    BWIA have just announced that they are pulling out of MAN at the end of the month.BTW

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: An Interesting Day #571410
    Cking
    Participant

    For weeks of moaning about poor photography conditions and boring aircraft, Saturday had two interesting visitors and good weather!!! Were was I? Manning the phones in a windowless office all afternoon!!!!
    On another subject I dropped in to see “Trident man” on friday. He is making an excelent job of the Trident. I comented to him that the cockpit was cleaner than most of the aircraft I work on!!!!

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Bristol Hercules flying? #1333813
    Cking
    Participant

    I don’t think that the “Flypast” Varsity crash was down to the wrong fuel. From what I remember it was, as Propstrike said a,perished rubber diaphram deep in the “innards” of one of the engines Hobbson injector. There was an ex RAF Devon crash around the same time due to the same thing. The C.A.A. issued a airworthiness notice concerning the shelf life of “Rubber” componants as a result of these two crashes.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Southend's most unusual visitor? #1336083
    Cking
    Participant

    Yes it did apear in the Italian job. There were three of them operating in and around Europe at the time. One crashed into a hillside whilst on a “cow” flight. Don’t know when or where though!

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: PIA flies B-777 from NY to Islamabad in one clean hop #588287
    Cking
    Participant

    All change!!! the second 777LR transited through MAN to day. The hot rumour on the ramp is that the LR’s will be stopping at MAN on the outbound sector but doing the return leg non stop! The reason???, all I can say is that it’s NOT for fuel!!! 😉

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: NSTB ALERT Airbus A300 model #590781
    Cking
    Participant

    I to, have misgivings about composite structure repairs, but there again I’m trained in tin and rivet repairs. I wonder if there was the same kind of discussion amongst the wood and fabric guys back in the old days?!!
    Don’t worry though Boeing and Airbus know what they are doing, if they don’t as Matthew M hints, there will be plenty of overtime to sort it out!!!

    Rgds Cking

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 871 total)