dark light

Cking

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 871 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: More 787 issues #524415
    Cking
    Participant

    IMO, you are letting your personal opinion cloud your judgement on this. Naming it “Plastic Pig” does not exactly lend your comments any credibility.

    It’s been called the plastic pig ever since it rolled out of the assembly shed.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Fields of Thunders – Nuclear testing in Australia #986734
    Cking
    Participant

    There was a good book called “Blast the bush” I forget the authors name, I THINK he was called Len Bates. He was a surveyor who found the site for the tests.
    The scientists did some risky things with the servicemen back then and the various governments since have messed the poor vets about so that they would die off and cost them less in compo.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #526980
    Cking
    Participant

    Thanks Matt for that link. I assumed that the short was within the mask container not outside it.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Most dangerous Boeing defect since 1990s 737 hardovers? #527258
    Cking
    Participant

    I think there has been a little miss understanding here.
    The 777 has a crew oxygen supply bottle below the flight deck floor. It has enough O2 in it to supply the (Possible) four crew for a half an hour. The O2 is supplied to the crew via a mask.
    http://www.intertechnique.fr/upload/activ_3_1.gif
    This mask is designed to be put on with one hand. To do this the masks straps are inflated with O2 when the crew grab it. They then place it over their heads and the straps deflate and the mask tightens around the crew members head. This mask assembly is stored in a box referred to as a Canister It is in fact a box about 6 X 4 X 18 inches.
    The Canisters that caused the Valujet accident were chemical oxygen generators.
    http://www.daerospace.com/OxygenSystems/Figure%201%20Chem%20Oxy%20Gen.png
    Two totally different things called the same thing.
    All Boeings and Airbus’s have gaseous oxygen supplied to the crew. Therefore this accident could have happened to most Boeing and Airbus aircraft.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Maintaining Warbirds… Major upheaval on the horizon #958448
    Cking
    Participant

    , with Licenced Engineers and the like onboard, along with all the other parts that will entail, human factors courses etc… These will be big changes and costs will rise.

    Whats wrong with that? The proper CAA licenced aircraft engineers keeps EVERYONE safe.
    If historic aircraft operators can’t afford them they should not be operating any sort of aircraft.:mad:

    Rgds Cking (LAE;))

    Cking
    Participant

    Be careful!! Thay might mean something bad.
    My old charge hand had a shaky start in the Navy and one entry on his service card was “D.R” Decline to report. A few years later another officer asked him what DR ment. Quick as a flash he replied “Definitely Reliable”!!!!

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Water bombers at St Athan #1017388
    Cking
    Participant

    I had a look around a turbine powered version of one of these at MAN a few years ago, They are, er…….”Special looking” as my mum said about me once!

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Walsh no longer interested in 3rd runway #531197
    Cking
    Participant

    There are two perfectly good runways at Manchester and runways at Birmingham, Glasgow and Standsted. You do not need to build another runway at LHR, you need to stop people traveling past under the utilized airports.

    Rgds Cking (At Manchester)

    in reply to: P-47 that'll be 4 dollars, how many do you want? #1061528
    Cking
    Participant

    My dear old Dad did his training at RAF Cosford when he joined the RAF, He remembers a line of “Late mark” spitfires being towed out of the hangars and the staff being offered them for five pounds each. There were two problems, they had to remove them from the airfield within two days and five pounds was a fortune back in 1954!

    Rgds Cking

    P.S. He bought five and they are in my shed. Please send CASH to……

    in reply to: Concorde's in Paris #1064930
    Cking
    Participant

    Assume you are referring to FF? Has it moved back airside then? Used to be on stilts at the side of a public road near the Hilton.

    I saw it from airside, still on it’s stilts. I didn’t realise it was “Landside” 😮
    I’m going back at the end of the month so I see if I can get some shots of it.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: Man – JFK flights……. #533739
    Cking
    Participant

    It will be a Boeing 757-200. One of the most reliable, safe aircraft in the sky. Powered by two Rolls Royce RB211’s (Say no more) suplied by three fuel tanks, each with two boost pumps. It has three hydraulic systems and three electrical systems. It has two air conditioning systems and three pressurization systems. It has three inertia navigation systems and three HF and VHF radio systems. The aircrew and cabin crew are all highly trained, highly experienced professionals. The aircraft are all maintained by Very experienced, highly qualified profesional engineers. You will get there ok, don’t worry
    The IFE? It’s a short flight, pick up a book in the terminal.

    RGds Cking

    Cking
    Participant

    Good thread running on PPRuNe about this incident… http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/488489-air-japan-ana-incident-nrt.html

    -Daz

    I have not seen the Alitalia and Asiana aircraft, so that SEVEN aircraft that I know about.

    Bmused55. What I mean by the aircraft has a habit of doing it is that seven different pilots have damaged six different aircraft in almost the same way. Similar long bodied aircraft, 757,777-300 and indeed 767-400 have not had as many, if any, incidents of fwd fuselage damage due to nose first landings.
    It would be interesting as everybody says to see how a long bodied 787 would behave.

    Rgds Cking

    Cking
    Participant

    Would that be repairable?

    Yes. The 767-300’s have so much of a habit of doing this Boeing have a standard repair scheme for it. It has to be done by Boeing though!
    I can think of five -300’s that have done this, one has done it twice:o

    Rgds Cking

    Edit: Hear’s another
    http://www.airliners.net/photo/Royal-Air-Maroc/Boeing-767-36N-ER/1538735/L/

    in reply to: Apparently the Thomson new livery #545571
    Cking
    Participant

    A 767 was rolled out of the old BA hangar at MAN today inthis livery.

    Rgds Cking

    in reply to: New P-38 recovery project! #1053150
    Cking
    Participant

    You’re all too late by about 20 years!
    http://www.badidea.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/sunday-sport-cover.gif

    That would be an interesting thing to recover. So would the aeroplane!:D

    Rgds Cking

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 871 total)