dark light

masr

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: I bet Mark12 hasn't seen this Spitfire #814841
    masr
    Participant

    It certainly looks like a 109 with that tail and engine thrustline, but those roundels look Italian to me. Puzzled!
    Mike

    in reply to: Variable incidence tailpane on Canberra #780386
    masr
    Participant

    Thing that I remember about the Canberra is that crews returning from Luqua were rumoured (it could not possible be true, now could it?) to stow duty free fags in the tailplane actuator space and the customs officers couldn’t check the area as ‘on the secret list’.
    Mike (RAF Marham 1956-8)

    in reply to: Flt Sgt Copping's P-40 From The Egyptian Desert #780388
    masr
    Participant

    There may be lessons, but whether anybody will learn from them is another matter
    Mike

    in reply to: Another link in the Dambusters raid passes away!! #780390
    masr
    Participant

    Absolutely
    Mike

    in reply to: P47-D Crash Site in Weymouth Bay. Now in 3D #771740
    masr
    Participant

    I get a ‘Forbidden’ message when I try to view the pictures – any idea why?
    Mike

    in reply to: Billy Bishop controversy. #879027
    masr
    Participant

    Oh, unless, of course it was meant that with no pilot in the cockpit and the engine running, prop blast under the tail would lift it
    Mike

    in reply to: Billy Bishop controversy. #879031
    masr
    Participant

    I don’t understand the comment that without the pilot in it the Nieuport would tip over on its nose. If that were the case a squadron would represent an interesting site before the pilots climbed aboard with all the a/c standing on their noses.
    Mike

    in reply to: P51 Mustang wings, painted or not ? #889892
    masr
    Participant

    Bare metal P-51s actually had a lacquer applied to the wings to prevent corrosion and also to fill any imperfections in the surface – it was intended to have the surface of the wings as smooth as possible to maximise the efficiency of the laminar flow section – in practive the wings tended to get grubby anyway – hardly surprising.
    Mike

    in reply to: Unique Iconic British 'Aircraft' Type Extinct Within Days! #850873
    masr
    Participant

    Crossed once from Calais – unfortunately at night so couldn’t see anything. My, it was noisy! BUT – convenient.
    Mike

    in reply to: Most Overrated Fighter Of WWII (2005 Zombie) #862595
    masr
    Participant

    I see that someone has said that the Spitfire was ‘not a war-winning’ aircraft. Of course it wasn’t. With the exception of the A-bomb (and even that needed to be transported by a B-29) no single artefact was a ‘war winner’. The war was won bay a combination of many weapons and, above all, by the men and women who used them. By itself, the Spitfire wouldn’t have won the BoB, let alone the war – not enough of them and ‘by itself’ would deny it the force multiplier of the command and control system of Fighter Command.
    On the other hand, it has also been posted that the BoB would have been won without the Spitfire = a bit nearer the truth but be realistic. Without the Spitfires, Fighter Command would have been reduced to 2/3 of the strength that it actually had during the battle and its fighters – the Hurricane and the Defiant – and there were still some Gladiators in squadron service – would all have been of inferior performance to the 109s opposing them – not a happy picture.
    Mike

    in reply to: Most Overrated Fighter Of WWII (2005 Zombie) #862599
    masr
    Participant

    Sorry – don’t know how I managed to post that twice – I wasn’t trying to be dogmatic, honest!
    Mike

    in reply to: Most Overrated Fighter Of WWII (2005 Zombie) #862602
    masr
    Participant

    My vote goes to the Bf 110 – OK, a reasonable night fighter later on but in 1940 it was supposed to be a fast, heavily armed, long range bomber escort and in that role I don’t think that it could be claimed to have been a success
    Mike

    in reply to: Most Overrated Fighter Of WWII (2005 Zombie) #862605
    masr
    Participant

    My vote goes to the Bf 110 – OK, a reasonable night fighter later on but in 1940 it was supposed to be a fast, heavily armed, long range bomber escort and in that role I don’t think that it could be claimed to have been a success
    Mike

    in reply to: Days numbered for the 747 #477239
    masr
    Participant

    I get a ‘page unavailable’ message
    Mike

    in reply to: Assistance with identifying a Browning 0.303 machine gun #890312
    masr
    Participant

    Surely the BESA mg was the 7.92 mg mostly used in AFVs, not a/c?
    Mike

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 46 total)