dark light

Arrows

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 396 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2395147
    Arrows
    Participant

    Singapore already have Hawkeyes and G550s in the AWACs role

    Saudia just put all its E-3s through a expensive upgrade, and I dont see them purchasing just one plane.

    Good point on the UAE deal though.

    Pakistan may not want any publicity spending money

    Other possibilities include

    Malaysia (require AWACs)
    Indonesia (require AWACs)
    South Africa (they bought Gripen and need AWACs)
    Jordan (No AWACs)
    Morrocco (No AWACs and just purchased a fleet of F-16s, would also help in immigration, smuggling)

    in reply to: SAAB receives order for Erieye AEW&C system #2395165
    Arrows
    Participant

    I would say it is UAE’s interim purchase or as it is based on a SAAB 2000 could be Pakistan reinstating its cancelled 5th plane.

    in reply to: Safeguarding NATO supply lines #2395200
    Arrows
    Participant

    This has very little to do with military aviation. In fact much more politics I would say….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2395215
    Arrows
    Participant

    Interestingly this report quotes Browne and puts a different spin on things.

    Indian Air Force (IAF) has sent a proposal to the ministry of defence (MoD) seeking permission to expand the airfield at Nyoma, south-east of Leh, so that it can operate fighter jets from a high altitude.
    If approved, it plans to make the expanded airfield fully functional in the next four years.

    IAF mooted the idea after defence minister AK Antony visited the advanced landing ground (ALG) in June this year.

    The Nyoma ALG, which was activated in September 2009, is at an altitude of 13,300 feet and has landing facilities for helicopters such as Mi-17 and transport aircraft such as An-32.

    Just 40km from the China border, Nyoma has a compact airstrip. The runway needs an extension of at least 12,000 feet with a hard surface to enable fighters such as Sukhoi-30 and MiGs to land.

    Nyoma was reactivated along with seven other defunct airfields. Its reactivation followed that of Daulat Beg Oldi (DBO) and Fukche in Ladakh, which were made operational in 2009. DBO is the highest airfield in the world at an altitude of 16,200 feet.

    In the run-up to the 78th Air Force Day, Air Marshal NAK Browne, air officer commanding-in-chief (AOC-in-C) of the Delhi-based Western Air Command, the sword arm of IAF, said on Friday, “There are no plans to extend the other ALGs in Ladakh — DBO and Fukche — due to limitations and challenges. When we look at the development of a base we should be able to operate each platform of IAF and the army, which includes fighters.”

    Chushul, another ALG in Ladakh, will also not be extended since it is only 5km from the Chinese border.

    Earlier, IAF has operated fighters such as Sukhoi-30 and Mig-29 from Leh and Thoise, both of which are at an altitude of 10,500 feet.

    These airstrips have loose gravel ground and due to inclement weather and rough terrain work can be carried out for only seven months in a year, which may delay their expansion up to four years.

    Browne said, “The expansion includes making a hard surface runway, infrastructure, re-fuelling, safety and air traffic control facilities. Most IAF fighters are designed to operate at a high altitude.”
    Western is the largest command of IAF extending from Rajasthan to Siachen and 11 of its 18 air bases are fighter bases.

    Browne also said the gap between the air forces of India and Pakistan was reducing, both in terms of numbers and capability, due to the help the US and China were extending to Islamabad in terms of fighter aircraft, missiles, and sensors.

    “Pakistan Air Force [PAF] is the most modernised among the neighbour’s three services. It was modernised systematically since 2005. The US and China assisted Pakistan to come up as a fairly potent force. The new F-16s sold to Pakistan by the US are a challenge to IAF,” he said.

    PAF has 21 fighter squadrons as compared to IAF’s 32.

    http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_air-force-seeks-expansion-of-nyoma-airfield-in-ladakh_1446784

    in reply to: Effective US-Soviet aircraft pairings? #2395631
    Arrows
    Participant

    During Kargil conflict some PAF F-7s had not had there Grifo radars installed so were flown along with F-16s.

    The Viper pilot helping to cue the F-7s with his APG-66

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2395879
    Arrows
    Participant

    😀

    Smiley without a thought? :dev2:

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2395880
    Arrows
    Participant

    Very true. Well done, you.

    However, this cliche needs proof. Please provide some.

    ~Ashish.

    PS: I hate cliches because people fire them off without thinking.
    But in your case, I bet you have thought this through. So lets see that.

    I agree, cliches are bad.

    I will give you some proof. Some of it you may have to google/research. Some of it you can see for yourself.

    1) As of right now PAF has more AWACS cover the IAF.2 Erieye V 2 Phalcon.
    2) PAFs ADGEs is much more advanced. IAF has no competitor to TPS-77
    3) C-5 AMRAAM of PAF is more then capable compared to IAF missiles
    4)Compared to the percentage of pilots, it is obvious a greater portion of PAF have advanced foriegn training

    Any more questions?
    :diablo:

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2395991
    Arrows
    Participant

    The Pakist. list in the previous post, pales in comparison to the strides India has made, and which is why NAK Browne, is not worried.

    That does not detract from the fact that the PAF has remedied major shortcomings. In fact in many areas of that list PAF could be considered equal if not surpassed IAF.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2396056
    Arrows
    Participant

    http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/10/lca-far-ahead-of-jf-17-in-contemporary.html

    Well, looks like we have someone worried.

    In all seriousness this has many flaws.

    PAF has one from a situation only 2 years ago where its most potent air defence assett was the AIM-9L/APG-66 combo to the situation today where it has made major strides in several key areas

    Medium level SAM – SPADA 2000
    AWACs– ERIRYE/CHINESE
    BVR – AMRAAM/SD-10
    Ground radar – TPS-77
    Air Refuelling – IL-76
    Combined NATO level exercises – Anatloian Eagle, Red Flag, UAE TLC
    Precision strike – Sniper, JDAM, extensive US training
    C4I– Pak developed system in partnership with a foreign vendor
    Maintenence – 5 fighter types being reduced to 3 eventually
    Training – Massive increase in pilots,technicians and senior staff sent to US facilities

    All of the above happened in the past 5 years. Not bad at all.

    in reply to: J-6/Q-5 in 2010 #2396083
    Arrows
    Participant

    Never saw a F-6 with 4 AAMS

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News And Discussion #14 #2397345
    Arrows
    Participant

    Centre pic is a 35 NOT a 29

    in reply to: J-6/Q-5 in 2010 #2397356
    Arrows
    Participant

    Phantom you are right, A-5 is essentially a ground attack plane. PAF had to push this into air defence role out of nessecity. Simply not enough pure air defence squadrons to cover entire country.

    As a result, every squadron, both multi-role and ground attack, all train in air to air role and all pull air defence alter.

    in reply to: J-6/Q-5 in 2010 #2397661
    Arrows
    Participant

    I dont know if the actual fittings and electronics on a Chinese missile would actually work on western rails and interfaces. Anyone?

    You would be surprised, as recently as the late 90s, A-5s were pulling air defence alert duty in the PAF as every squadron had to pull reaction alert.

    Standard fitting was 4 AAMs and tanks

    in reply to: J-6/Q-5 in 2010 #2397712
    Arrows
    Participant

    They use the Magic II.

    I dont know if a Chinese SRAAM could fit on a Sidewinder launch rail or need different wiring.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2397714
    Arrows
    Participant

    Taygibay

    “Now, I know and understand that some of you mates believe that you already have such a great framework established with a former colony
    of yours so I will point out in closing that the respective size of nations entering such a deal is almost as important as their intents lest over time,
    the gains become somewhat lopsided, which, I guess, the rest of you mates are beginning to suspect.”

    WTF!?

Viewing 15 posts - 136 through 150 (of 396 total)