dark light

Arrows

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 396 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2373930
    Arrows
    Participant

    107 planes in a single base? And it makes sense…? No, definitely it makes not.

    ALL C130 are going to be scrapped, so to have only two kind of planes to support. The K was going to go in any case within 2012, the J is going to go out of service, hopefully in time with the arrival of A400, but possibly, seen how smart this SDR is, in one go.

    But after all, with the armed forces being slaughtered, what do you need air mobility for…? To bring aid to Haiti, a couple of planes would already be enough. Because that’s what UK is going to do in the future, and nothing more, if this folly is allowed to continue.

    And i hated Labour! GIVE ME BROWN BACK!

    Massive mistakes to cut the Js, they are the best tactical transports out there, and we may not have enough A400s. This would hurt units like the PARAs.

    As for 107 planes in one base, the USAF and USN have been basing more then 100 of one type of fighter at single bases for years. This really is no big deal as long as the infrasrtucure is built for them.

    in reply to: UK Defence Review Part II #2373960
    Arrows
    Participant

    Crickey! Even getting rid of the new C-130Js or are they just referring to the K variant? That seems insane.

    Cutting the infantry is madness.

    Having all the Typhoons based at Coningsby makes sense, you could always just rotate a small 4 plane detatchment to Leachers for Northern Q.

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2374220
    Arrows
    Participant

    JF-17 returning from Farnborough 2010. Anyone know which airbase that is?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzSJyg-r0ls

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spAqdefYV78

    In the second clip, the cars have UAE registration plates.

    in reply to: Indian Navy News and Discussions #2029593
    Arrows
    Participant

    Pretty damning report on the state on Indian Naval aviation

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvJH2q5k5zc

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2374424
    Arrows
    Participant

    No word from USAF or PAF on the exercises?

    in reply to: Pakistan Air Force III #2375007
    Arrows
    Participant

    AWSOME pix Rookh! Many thanks. I fell in love with the F-16 all over again….

    Kramer

    you originally wrote

    “only interesting part is that they’re made at HAL”

    and now admit they were just part of a 4 company team. CARTS system is definatley not being made by HAL right now. Your statement was misleading and proven wrong.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375605
    Arrows
    Participant

    For the price you are paying, I would hope so….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375628
    Arrows
    Participant

    I know but even in worst case six or seven years from now is not that bad. IAF would have only had the full complement for 2-3 years then.

    Good point, it is worrying that it rests on so many assumptions.

    The Republicans MAY get in
    Their attitude MAY be different then Obamas
    Indian Government MAY get the concessions it wants

    Much to many variables. Better plan for something you know is a firm option….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375862
    Arrows
    Participant

    The way Obama is going I doubt it.

    Yeah, but you have to assume worst case, anyway, we are moving off topic.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375882
    Arrows
    Participant

    True that but i fully expect it to be signed, I think the current impasse is because India do not want to sign it without getting anything in return.

    May be they will sign it during the next republican admin.

    That might be in 6-7 years from now!!!!!

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375885
    Arrows
    Participant

    This seems shocking!

    CAG Pulls Up IAF For Operation, Maintenance Of Mi Series, Slams Navy For Functioning Of Aviation Arm

    Comptroller and audit General (CAG) has slammed the Indian Airforce (IAF) for their operation and maintenance of Mi series of helicopters, after conducting a performance audit on the Mi fleet of the IAF. The country’s watchdog has also pulled up the Indian Navy for the functioning of its aviation arm.

    In a report tabled today in Parliament, following were the findings by CAG:

    — IAF is operating with 74% of the helicopters against the current operational requirements.

    — The existing fleet is aging and nearly 78% of the choppers have already completed their prescribed life and Total Technical Life (TTL) extension has been carried out on them to elongate their life.

    — Despite availability of funds and a specific acquisition program, IAF was unable to induct even a single helicopter between 2002 and 2007.

    The actual utilisation rate of medium lift and heavy lift helicopters varied between 33 to 53 percent and 10-20 percent respectively.

    — Serviceability levels were low and fluctuated between 45-75%.

    — There was a deficit in the availability of helicopters owing to substantial aid given to civil authorities for counter-insurgency, UN missions, requests from friendly nations, unauthorised modification of choppers for VVIP use.

    Indian Navy:

    A performance audit on the Indian Navy’s aviation arm showed delays and shortcomings in the preparation and finalisation of the long term acquisition plans.

    — Indian Navy’s air combat capabilities have been drastically reduced owing to availability of only one carrier.

    — Availability of aircraft was a mere 26% of asset strength on account of high number of aircraft undergoing repair.

    — Replacement for the aging aircraft carrier will not be possible before 2013.

    — Attack capabilities of the already depleted aircraft fleet on-board the carrier have been restricted in the absence of a fully functional radar and limited firing of practice missiles.

    — The IN acquired six second-hand UH-3H helicopters in November 2006, whose life had expired and had many defects.

    http://chhindits.blogspot.com/2010/08/cag-pulls-up-iaf-for-operation.html

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2375942
    Arrows
    Participant

    That is not the point. I agree they can, but it would be a massive pain and cost more then just getting the aircraft already equipped with US stuff.

    With the jamming, comms and special nav kit, the “Special Forces” C-130 loses the “Special” bit….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2376035
    Arrows
    Participant

    :rolleyes: if they are not integrating it they cannot charge for it in the first place.

    I realise that. If, however you want to buy new kit from elsewhere and integrate it with a US aircraft it will take more time and more money.

    Good luck with that……

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2376097
    Arrows
    Participant

    Of course you can. Which will cost even more to buy and integrate.

    May as well as just get gold plated C-130s….

    in reply to: Indian Air Force – News & Discussion # 13 #2376120
    Arrows
    Participant

    Air force gets US planes minus security net

    Source

    Looks like a waste of money….

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 396 total)