dark light

RonaldV

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 65 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2541956
    RonaldV
    Participant

    The only two shots I still have of “Embraceable Annie”:

    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/Annie.jpg
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/annie2.jpg
    According to Airliners.net she was scrapped in 2003

    And a 5 engine Honeywell Boeing 720 taken from Airliners.net
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/651277.jpg

    in reply to: Aircraft With Weird-Looking Modifications #2541973
    RonaldV
    Participant

    This one belongs to the MDA. Anyone know what the bird is used for?

    I ran into her in alt.binaries.pictures.aviation back in 2001. The guy that photographed and posted her, Dale Elheart (a.k.a. “The Legend of LAX”) told me:

    “Sweet Judy is a plane that doesn’t exist, & is not talked about. I have
    a friend who had a roll of film confiscated for shooting her. She is
    owned by, I think, Raytheon, & used as a test bed for what I believe to
    be side scan radars. You will notice a bulge on her belly also. The
    color scheme, at a guess, is from Continental Airlines. The colors &
    stripe are the same. She replaced a 707 called Embracable Annie (of
    which I will post pics soon). The name “Sweet Judy” is actually painted
    on the nose. The reg is something like N909SJ.

    I can’t really tell you any more since she is nonexistent.”

    Some of the shots he posted of Sweet Judy (who is actually N910SF):
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/IMG_1827-sweet-judy.jpg
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/IMG_2292.jpg

    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/IMG_2293.jpg

    Sweet Judy with the JSF systems testbed:
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/IMG_2299.jpg

    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/IMG_5108.jpg

    Sweet Judy at one time also carried this modification:
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/UnK_DC10.jpg

    And I found this one at Airliners.net:
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/709585.jpg

    While on the subject of DC-10 modifications: I’m sure you all know of the two RNLAF KDC-10 tanker mods, but how about this tanker mod? ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
    http://ronald.nb.nu/keypub/odds/Bombardement d'eau.jpg
    The second largest tanker in the world, there is/was also an Evergreen B-747 tanker flying around.

    in reply to: new colors for Belgian Demo F-16 #2542226
    RonaldV
    Participant

    on teusday 11april 2007, the F-16AM for the 2007 airshow season was presented to the public.
    the aircraft has been painted in a 3-tone grey sheme, and carries a small belgian fin flash on the tip of the tail. i dont know if this is the finished sheme, but im my oppinion it looks great on an operational fighter, i wish they applied it on the entire fleet. but for a demobird, its kinda bold 8)

    (photo: mil.be)

    pretty bird

    She looks smart, although I’m somehow stuck with the feeling the designer took a lot of inspiration from the previous KLu demo bird. I cannot find the serial anywhere, have any idea?

    in reply to: Photo shoot location suggestions? #1248322
    RonaldV
    Participant

    If leaving the UK is not an issue: the Aviodrome in the Netherlands has a beautiful 1930s airport building (with accessible control tower), with matching aircraft (An-2, PBY, DC-3 to name some) available on the platform. We’ve supported photo shoots like that in the past.

    in reply to: Worth a restore, or sell for scrap? #1248331
    RonaldV
    Participant

    Dear All

    I am new to this forum so please bear with me on my first post. I am the MD of Legendary Aircraft Kft in Hungary and we have a full restoration facility where we rebuild and restore Classic / Warbird aircraft. This Tracker is by far a great candidate to rebuild back to airworthy condition subject to an inspection to fully look at the condition of the airframe.

    We would certainly look at purchasing the aircraft subject to an inspection and put here back in the air in her original colors.

    However if there are any other airframes that people know of in better condition please let me know as the Tracker is by far the next generation of warbids to be recognised and we would like to see one gracing the skys of Europe once again.

    Hope to hear from anyone that can help with this aircraft or other similar types. My email is [email]davesaunders@worldonline.co.za[/email]

    Cheers
    David

    David,
    I would LOVE to be of service to you, but you would have to contact the Aviodrome, as I am only on the volunteer force. Their website should point you to their contact.

    in reply to: Worth a restore, or sell for scrap? #1248335
    RonaldV
    Participant

    If anyone can help with additional pictures inside and history on 159 this would be a help and current status.

    Cheers
    David

    I would love to take a look (and pics) inside, but we’re strictly prohibited form doing so. I’ll try to find out who “owns” her (crewchief-wise), maybe he can help me.
    Her current status is “on display, in need of restauration”.
    As for her history:

    Replacing the Avenger the RNLN (Royal Netherlands Navy) received 28 S-2As via the USNavy. In addition to those, the MLD (Marine Luchtvaartdienst or Naval Flying Service) received 17 CS-2F-1s through the Canadian Navy, entering service under the designation CS-2A.
    VSQ-1 received the CS-2F-1, while VSQ-2, 4 and 5 flew the S-2A Tracker. VSQ-1 was based at Hato (Curaรงao) and flew -when she was nearby- from the aircraft carrier Hr.Ms Karel Doorman (a.k.a “Fat Boat”) whilst VSQ 4 was the regular on-board squadron. The other squadrons were based at MVK (NAS) Valkenburg.
    After HrMs Karel Doorman got withdrawn from service in 1968, the Trackers only flew from land bases. Between 1968 and 1972 eightteen S-2A’s were converted to S-2N. The other aicraft were delivered to Turkey. In 1972 four S-2Nโ€™s were converted into target tugs and redesignated US-2N.

    159 made her final flight (and the final flight of the type in Dutch service) on October 1, 1975, with sistership 160. Afterwards she was put on display at the Aviodome museum at Schiphol Airport, Amsterdam. A few years ago the Aviodome moved to EHLE, taking with her 159, and changing the name to “Aviodrome”. Initially she was put on a concrete dispersal, but when the Aviodrome began to take in more large aircraft she was moved into her current location across the taxiway, next to the hangar.

    http://www.dutchaviationpage.nl/museums/graph/ad_s2n.JPG

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1248984
    RonaldV
    Participant

    Bringing back the subject:

    I saw the Ju-52 during the Easter weekend. She’s been cleansed, put on jacks, and had her wings mated. I have to admit she looks MUCH better now. But there’s still a LOT of work to be done to get het ready for the May display!

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1248989
    RonaldV
    Participant

    [That’s corect. I should have been more clear: she’s owned and operated by the Neptune Association, but operationally and for publicity she’s practically Aviodromes’. If Aviodrome were running an airline, the PBY would be on wet-lease: aircraft, maintenance and crew provided by the owner, but handling and pax by the Aviodrome.

    And you mean by SNA the Stichting Catalina PH-PBY?

    Oops, major ****-up on my end. You’re right.

    This comes from their website:

    Nationaal Luchtvaart-Themapark Aviodrome
    Stichting Catalina heeft een unieke samenwerking met Nationaal Luchtvaart-Themapark Aviodrome waar zij onderdeel is van de vliegende collectie en rondvluchten uitvoert!

    Translated: The Catalina Foundation is in a unique cooperation with the National Aviation Themepark Aviodrome where she forms part of the flying collection and undertakes airtours!

    in reply to: Worth a restore, or sell for scrap? #1249115
    RonaldV
    Participant

    That is a good way of getting them to corrode. They are far better if inhibited properly and left. Ground running them does not get them to operating temperature and will not boil off any moisture in the oil, which if it has not been changed will be next to useless. Oil should be changed every 25/50 hours (depending on engine) or four months unless they are inhibited.

    Found this out at a great seminar by Shell Aviation. It all comes down to the lead in the fuel turning to acid with the water which low temperatures will not solve. Proper hinhibiting oil sticks to stuff inside and is much better for the engine.

    I’m pretty sure they’ve looked after that. They are the premier aviation school in the Netherlands, sponsored by the Dutch MoD, KLM and other major players in Dutch aviation. Actually: there’s one thing that is definately not good: let an aircraft just be. Unless they have the money to keep the airframes to flight status (and almost no museum has those resources), standing idle (ie in museums) is FAR worse than running engines once a year.

    Back on topic: what would be a key issue to scrap a plane, instead of restoring her? Appearantly oxidation is not. But there has to be a moment where restauration is simply not worth the effort. Does it really have to fall apart? Who has ever had to make that decision?

    in reply to: Worth a restore, or sell for scrap? #1249810
    RonaldV
    Participant

    Looks like a great candidate to restore for static possible ground runnable condition!;)

    To be honest: I would be happy just to get permission and a crew together to get her back to display condition. If I wanted to get a “Stoof” running, or even flying, I’d make the apprentice school in Hoofddorp an offer they can’t refuse. Their “Stoof” is a near perfect “restore to full flight status” bird. Even it’s engines are still in pristine condition, and run at least once a year!

    Taken from this excellent “Stoof” site:

    http://home.planet.nl/~roden171/fotos/klm1.jpg

    http://home.planet.nl/~roden171/fotos/klm2.jpg

    in reply to: New Ju.52 in the UK? #1249819
    RonaldV
    Participant

    ” I should make it clear that Fokker was not the only Dutch aircraft ”

    Any info on the Aviodrome plans to erect a replica of the Koolhoven factory on their site? Knowing the site, where would that physically be?

    The plan is to build it between the main museum building and the bunker that contains the Fokker files, roughly where the “simulator” ride currently stands. Or rather: that’s the last I heard of it.

    Have to correct you on the Catalina, it is not owned by the aviodrome. But its infact owned by an other organisation.

    That’s corect. I should have been more clear: she’s owned and operated by the Neptune Association, but operationally and for publicity she’s practically Aviodromes’. If Aviodrome were running an airline, the PBY would be on wet-lease: aircraft, maintenance and crew provided by the owner, but handling and pax by the Aviodrome.

    in reply to: British C-130 Destroyed in Iraq #2543504
    RonaldV
    Participant

    (…)when a C130 collided with a CH54 (…)

    You might want to change that to a CH-53. The Tarhe never went to SW Asia ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: Worth a restore, or sell for scrap? #1250405
    RonaldV
    Participant

    A quick search on the net says that your S2 was one of the last 2 trackers in Dutch navy service but there are 3 or 4 other survivors in exsistance in the Netherlands see the below link for a useful site on trackers based in the Netherlands.

    http://home.planet.nl/~roden171/mld.html

    curlyboy

    I am aware of 3 other Trackers in the Netherlands: one at the MLM in Kamp Zeist (Soesterberg), one at NAS De Kooij, and one at an apprentice school near Amsterdam Airport (which is by far the best technically preserved example, albeit in KLM colours).

    The question was not so much inspired by how “rare” the bird is in the Netherlands. I just feel it is a waste and shame to let her rot, much like you answered in your first post.

    in reply to: The immortal Herk, for all your pics 'n propaganda #2543546
    RonaldV
    Participant

    Check here:

    http://www.spectrumwd.com/c130/articles/float.htm

    And that covers the model on floats, thank you! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Note, it is usually not the best idea to revive old threads ๐Ÿ˜‰ (But this one fits your question, so… )

    I’m aware of that, I’m not a newbie on forums, although I am new here. But usually it IS the best idea to post where your question is most on topic. And this one seemd just right. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    in reply to: your country armed forces your way #2543551
    RonaldV
    Participant

    Netherlands:
    Air Force:
    210x F-35 (3 Main Operating Bases + 1 squadron at the Dutch Antilles)
    4x C-130H/H-30
    4x C-17A
    4x KDC-10 tanker + 2x DC-10 transport
    20x Hawk T.66 (ex-Swiss AF)
    14x PC-7
    4x Fokker60U (in support of the Dutch Antilles)
    2x Fokker 50
    2x GIV
    2x Fokker 70 Executive
    6x E2C Hawkeye 2000
    10 X NH-90CSAR
    18 X NH-90 TTH
    30 X AH-64D helicopter.
    24 X CH-47F (partial rebuilt from earlier CH-47Ds)

    Navy
    15 X P-8 – patrol, recce
    35 X NH-90NFH

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 65 total)