Your democracy is being bought and manipulated courtesy of the manufacturers.
It’s not mine, I’m not allowed to vote 😉
Your democracy is being bought and manipulated courtesy of the manufacturers.
It’s not mine, I’m not allowed to vote 😉
Do they not have helicoptors with IR? could they not have waited until the target got into a less inhabited area? or did the desperation of finishing this overcome all reason and sense.
There are at least 3 Blackhawks & apparently a Kiowa gunship(?) in the area
So Rick, How would you have dealt with the situation?.BTW, I didn’t know you owned 20 guns, question is, why?.
Jim.
Lincoln .7
No idea, that’s above my paygrade. & I’ve posted pics of my guns before…
8 Mosins:
4 Enfields:
Savage .22LR.
Mossberg 590 & a few others..
…all sadly lost in a tragic boating accident 😉
Do they not have helicoptors with IR? could they not have waited until the target got into a less inhabited area? or did the desperation of finishing this overcome all reason and sense.
There are at least 3 Blackhawks & apparently a Kiowa gunship(?) in the area
So Rick, How would you have dealt with the situation?.BTW, I didn’t know you owned 20 guns, question is, why?.
Jim.
Lincoln .7
No idea, that’s above my paygrade. & I’ve posted pics of my guns before…
8 Mosins:
4 Enfields:
Savage .22LR.
Mossberg 590 & a few others..
…all sadly lost in a tragic boating accident 😉
Meanwhile…. who needs guns?
So the terrorist on the run in Boston has managed to procure himself an AK-47 – illegal to own in MA – and the Police have told their largely unarmed citizens to barricade themselves in their homes and call 911 in the event the terrorist shows up at their door. Washington logic playing out right in front of us. And as a cherry on top – Diane Feinstein is on the Domestic Terrorism Committee.
Meanwhile…. who needs guns?
So the terrorist on the run in Boston has managed to procure himself an AK-47 – illegal to own in MA – and the Police have told their largely unarmed citizens to barricade themselves in their homes and call 911 in the event the terrorist shows up at their door. Washington logic playing out right in front of us. And as a cherry on top – Diane Feinstein is on the Domestic Terrorism Committee.
When a car driven by a drunk kills people they blame the driver
When a bomb kills people they blame the bomber
When a gun kills people they blame the gun????
– – – Updated – – –
As for Piers Morgan – you don’t like him because his opinion isn’t yours -however rather than trying to suggest something it’s far easier to persist in the notion that the status quo works.
The yanks don’t like Morgan for the same reason as the Brits don’t like him: the guy is a parasite.
When a car driven by a drunk kills people they blame the driver
When a bomb kills people they blame the bomber
When a gun kills people they blame the gun????
– – – Updated – – –
As for Piers Morgan – you don’t like him because his opinion isn’t yours -however rather than trying to suggest something it’s far easier to persist in the notion that the status quo works.
The yanks don’t like Morgan for the same reason as the Brits don’t like him: the guy is a parasite.
Just one weapon to defend ones own family and property.Not build up your own personal arsenal, as seemingly the NRA does.
Jim.
Lincoln .7
The 2nd doesn’t say ANYTHING about how many you can have & you didn’t seem to have any issue with me having about 20….
& one what exactly? one pistol? one shotgun? one rifle?
Just one weapon to defend ones own family and property.Not build up your own personal arsenal, as seemingly the NRA does.
Jim.
Lincoln .7
The 2nd doesn’t say ANYTHING about how many you can have & you didn’t seem to have any issue with me having about 20….
& one what exactly? one pistol? one shotgun? one rifle?
Of course its always easy to bring the Second Amendment to the table and say why should the masses suffer for a few but its also a fact the the founding fathers didn’t predict the M-4 -Glock pistol and Barrett 50 calibre. I am sure if they had the chance to write it again they would amend it to make ownership proportionate to the need i.e to defend your property and not to amass private arsenals with weapons that clearly have little use in hunting or self defence
In which case the first amendment also needs rewriting to take account of computers/internet, cellphones, cameras, movies etc..
Of course the REALLY bad news for you guys in the UK is that Piers Morgan promised to *deport* himself if the new gun legislation didn’t pass… So it looks like you’re getting the imbecile back, maybe you could post a list of villages missing their idiot 🙂
Of course its always easy to bring the Second Amendment to the table and say why should the masses suffer for a few but its also a fact the the founding fathers didn’t predict the M-4 -Glock pistol and Barrett 50 calibre. I am sure if they had the chance to write it again they would amend it to make ownership proportionate to the need i.e to defend your property and not to amass private arsenals with weapons that clearly have little use in hunting or self defence
In which case the first amendment also needs rewriting to take account of computers/internet, cellphones, cameras, movies etc..
Of course the REALLY bad news for you guys in the UK is that Piers Morgan promised to *deport* himself if the new gun legislation didn’t pass… So it looks like you’re getting the imbecile back, maybe you could post a list of villages missing their idiot 🙂
The criminals ignore laws argument is amazing – why have speed limits ? Criminals ignore them . Why have any laws on drug dealing ? Criminals ignore them as well! Should no laws ever be passed because a small percentage on the population choose to ignore them?
Strawman argument (again), we have gun laws (23,000 of them) & when people break those laws they are dealt with (except in Chicago obviously), same goes with traffic laws & drug laws.
Perhaps you could come up with a reason why you (personally) should give up your car because some people drive drunk?
The criminals ignore laws argument is amazing – why have speed limits ? Criminals ignore them . Why have any laws on drug dealing ? Criminals ignore them as well! Should no laws ever be passed because a small percentage on the population choose to ignore them?
Strawman argument (again), we have gun laws (23,000 of them) & when people break those laws they are dealt with (except in Chicago obviously), same goes with traffic laws & drug laws.
Perhaps you could come up with a reason why you (personally) should give up your car because some people drive drunk?
The Democrat controlled Senate just told Obumble to pound sand & defeated all his gun control idiocy…. so even the people in his own party won’t do his bidding. Hopefully this will cause Feinstein to have a fatal coronary.