dark light

AegisFC

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 138 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2055486
    AegisFC
    Participant

    What the hell does “crew properly maintained” mean lol? They aren’t exactly an engine boiler 😉

    The ship was going to be decommissioned, why would it be well maintained?

    This may as well have happened in a house. Fire + closed space = fatality.

    He obviously meant keeping the crew well trained in silly little things like I dunno… fire fighting and damage control. Even if the ship is being decommed you keep the crew as well trained as possible.
    The ship needs to be maintained until they day they turn out the lights to prevent things like short circuits from killing the people on board, you can’t just stop funding and training a ship on its way out or it will become a dangerous safety hazard to those still on board.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2057885
    AegisFC
    Participant

    Why there is always a tugboat in the middle of these task forces? It is the same with the ships that went to Venezuela…Is this a “standard procedure” for the RuN or fear that the ships will break middle of the way….????:confused::confused:

    I ask because this is motive of laugh all around the web….It gives the impression that they not trust their own ships…:confused:

    Can someone enlighten me?

    Last time they did a major (for them) deployment they sent some tugs as well. So no they don’t trust their ships.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2062737
    AegisFC
    Participant

    [COLOR=”Blue”][SIZE=”4″]
    http://www.defense-update.com/images_large/lcs_at_sea.jpg

    That thing sure looks under armed.

    in reply to: USS Barry DDG 52 aground in the Black Sea #2064668
    AegisFC
    Participant

    There is more to it than that.
    http://informationdissemination.blogspot.com/2008/10/navys-unforgivable-sin.html

    The destroyer was being maneuvered by tugs in the Black Sea port of Samsun, Turkey, when the aft section of the ship became caught on a sand bar, said Cmdr. Scott Miller, a 6th Fleet spokesman. No one was hurt.

    And…

    A Turkish harbor pilot was aboard the Barry when the ship grounded, according to a Pentagon official, but it isn’t clear if the pilot was in charge of navigating the ship or the ship’s crew was in control.

    So it isn’t like the CO or the OOD wasn’t paying attention and drove the ship onto the sand bar.

    in reply to: Navy News from Around the World II #2065570
    AegisFC
    Participant

    That image is from 2003. A year later, she no longer has the Mk13 and STIR. So, wondering what “The frigate will be refurbished with anti-submarine missile and other latest systems at a cost of $ 65 million. ” wil entail.

    Source of both photo’s: http://www.navsource.org/archives/07/0708.htm

    Just the launcher arm was removed and a plate bolted over where it used to be. None of the below spaces equipment was removed, just placed in layup and no longer maintained.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2066748
    AegisFC
    Participant

    realistically, what is the ‘typical’ Russian CBG right now? I know that Peter the Great often accompany’s Kuznetsov but what else?

    It didn’t last deployment.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread #2066787
    AegisFC
    Participant

    Let stay in the present days. A carrier group formed by the Kuznetsov, the Peter the Great, 2 Sovremenny class destroyers, 2 Udaloy class destroyer, an Oscar II SSGN and an Akula SS can be matched by a single USN carrier Group? I don’t think so. The problem for Russia is that can build just one Group of such a composition. Nevertheless, this group should rule the sea from Kola to Greenland.

    Sure, whatever you say…:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Honeymoon pics-military #2067169
    AegisFC
    Participant

    You were on your honeymoon and you took pics of Military stuff?:confused:
    You must have a VERY understanding bride.

    AegisFC
    Participant

    No? considering the price of scrapping them or preparing them for scuttling, as opposed to making money and securing a regional ally, why not?

    The navy usually makes money off of scraping of ships. A US carrier won’t be sold because the design is too similar to the in service CVN’s.
    Add to that they are crew intensive and the Kitty Hawk wasn’t in good condition when she was retired.

    AegisFC
    Participant

    This could be going in a couple of directions-1), buy Rafale, (dont they have FOCH, teh ex french carrier that is able to handle Rafale?

    or 2) buy F-18F, position yuorself as a vital ally, negotiate purchase of kittyhawk?

    The US would never sell one of its Carriers.

    in reply to: Shenzhou VII launched. #2467917
    AegisFC
    Participant

    Was the capsule one of their own design, or just a copy of a Russian one?

    in reply to: AWACS invaluable asset or sitting duck? #2474753
    AegisFC
    Participant

    The AWACS has a larger spread of its modules and more modules overall for more granulation in its search. Its not even remotely comparable to a MiG-31. Add in the electrical power available to the E-3 and its on a whole different level. This thread has turned into around 50% posts just of star49’s opinion and its mind numbing to say the least.

    He is a fanboi what do you expect?

    in reply to: Cool paint schemes thread #2481828
    AegisFC
    Participant

    http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/9021/wwwplanesczmig2911hungaoc5.jpg

    Ok…that wins!

    in reply to: Idiot question #2072470
    AegisFC
    Participant

    They don’t.

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2073982
    AegisFC
    Participant

    *Shrug* :confused:

    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Naval/post-252-1203309802.jpg

    Kind of looks like a towed array sonar without the covering.

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 138 total)