Oh I got one!
I was in the (fairly) high levels of the USAF public affairs effort during and after the Top Gun craze and more than a few generals were upset that the USAF didn’t have a PR bonus like that.
But the truth is, that even if it were offered, they’d reject it as being too dangerous to their careers to approve (the Navy was always a bit more relaxed in those things, something I learned while working in a joint assignment…as an example watch Cher’s If I could turn back time video on youtube…if she had worn an outfit like that infront of a B-52 instead of a battleship, the approving general would have been running the Pentagon resturant the next day).
I have lots of examples and stories about how senior officers shied away from TV and movie projects for fear of ending up with eggs on their faces…(two of which involve the BBC) I’d love to write them up for FlyPast or AFM sometime…
Heck, in Texas, a local TV station offered to show the base airshow on live TV. I thought it was a great dea since the purpose of an airshow is to show the capabilities of the service to the public. (by comparison, in the UK, the local radio station wanted 500 pounds to cover the event at Bentwaters).
The TV offer was rejected out of hand at a when I mentioned it at a planning meeting, not by the General, but by his wife who cut him off before he could answer. She was afraid that a Thunderbird would auger-in and destroy his chance for a second star.
That general was the worst boss I had in the military. Of course he got his second star…
Actually the Navy is just as bad. Recently PBS aired an excellent documentary called “Carrier”, it was about the Nimitz’s 2005 deployment and all about the crew, not the equipment like you see on those stupid Discovery channel specials. Even though it was approved and the Navy only asked for 2 things to be left out because of security concerns, several admirals apparently shat bricks over this and decided to come out with an “official message” complete with a very lame website with the “truth”, their reaction hurt a heck of a lot more than the show did.
Do USAF B-52 even carry the Harpoon anymore?:confused:
They still can but they never practice missions.
to add more fuel to the the fire
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Farms-tass.su%2F%3Fpage%3Darticle%26aid%3D56932%26cid%3D25&hl=en&ie=UTF8&sl=ru&tl=en
Batch contract for the modernization TAKR “Admiral Gorshkov” may be revised and will be 3.4 billion dollars
sorry its a translated artical
100 million dollars for fuel for a one year sea trial? What are they running it on, diced lions? Liquefied diamonds?
The M2 Browning is a well established weapon but has many inherent problems in its design. While actually changing the barrel is fairly straight forward the head space and timing settings for the gun make mean that changing the barrel properly and maintaining reliability is not that straight forward. The normal way to avoid the problem is to simply fire in short bursts and not overheat the barrel in the first place.
Head space and timing is easy, on both destroyers I was on everyone who received training or fired the gun was given lots of training on how to do that, and it was required maintenance before assuming watch in some ports.
Firing in short bursts is preferable to blazing away on full auto anyways, being in a non stabilized mount on a rocking ship makes accurate aiming problematic so firing a short burst then correcting isn’t a bad thing.
On the other hand a lightweight gas powered 50 cal with 3 or 4 barrels could be a simple weapon that is very reliable. At a rate of 500-1,500rpm there would be few problems with overheating the barrels and a single dud round would be cycled and ejected simply through momentum of the action. The rate of fire might drop a fraction from the missing gas impulse from the round that failed to fire, but overall it wouldn’t really be noticible except if a dozen or more rounds in a row were duds… which is very unlikely.
The USN also uses dual mounted M-2’s, M-60’s and as I was leaving service SAW’s were making an appearance.
The M2 is simple and rugged. It can stand up to the salt water environment better than a more complicated weapon. Most USN ships leave their mounts bolted in place all the time, especially when operating in an area such as the Persian Gulf so you don’t want anything overly complicated compared to a well understood and proven gun.
Obviously 😉 But I like the look.
It does look interesting.
I’m a Lighting fan (which in part explains why I don’t find the x-32 revolting).
Came across this one:
Photochop.
C-130?
That would be my vote if you consider it is still under manufacture from its original company and at the same location.
I always thought that Tacit Blue always looked weird.
I remember reading in a book on warships that the cost of refurbishing (1980s) an Iowa class BB was less than that of a brand new OHP frigate…..any truth to that?
The main reason the Iowa’s were brought back was because it was the cheapest way at the time to get a decent amount of ABL Tomahawks out to sea, the refit they got was consistent with that (upgraded comms, CIWS bolted in place, ABL’s and the usual crew habitability upgrades).
But once VLS equipped ships started to show up they were withdrawn from service and the schools and other maintenance equipment was withdrawn and destroyed as well.
I’ve noticed some similarities between the the Iowa BB fans and the F-14 fan bois both have one thing in common, they both seem to think that upgrading those old platforms would result in a weapon platform that is cheaper than anything else around, more effective than ANYTHING!!!!!! and dig up spurious proof that they are correct.
I agree, my only problem was those who had the worst or minial jobs made no effort to get more education or learn a skill that would qualify them for a better job. All in all, this was the best program to show “human face” in the Navy on long cruises.
Adrian
Most of those people were VERY low on the pay scale and don’t have much choice in what they were doing. To move into a more technical job or even a different job than the one you are in requires your chain of command to approve it and it isn’t in their best interest to approve such a move (especially if you are off the ship for months learning a new job) so usually that kind of thing happens when you are up to re-enlist and you can negotiate for a school you want. That show did not show the entire story, we don’t know what they were doing every hour of the day the ship probably offered college courses (my last 2 deployments had a professor on board for classes) and we don’t know who took them or if those people even had time to do take them if they were working 12+ days.
I liked the show, but I was not to happy when the young man painted over paint. In my days we chipped the paint before painting. Painting several levels of paint on a ship is not good for the weight of a ship.
Hate to break it to you but that is the way it is done now a days. I’ve hardly every been given enough time to PROPERLY do preservation, heck I’ve hardly even been given time to just chip the old off and then toss on a coat of primer and paint.
Recently a ship failed INSURV and they found several extra tons of paint over old paint over the whole ship while other parts (non-skid areas mostly) were dangerously corroded, so I suspect this is a fleet wide problem.
I saw the series and I loved it, the best “warts and all” documentary I’ve seen on any military in a long time.