dark light

plumberunion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 111 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese Blackhawks #2281852
    plumberunion
    Participant

    When did China buy the Cougar?

    in reply to: life onboard Chinese super carrier #2002498
    plumberunion
    Participant

    *groan* Don’t tell me Chinese actually call Liaoning a super carrier…

    nope, officially it is not even called a carrier, it is a scientific research and training vessel 🙂
    the first long voyage is likely to west pacific, pass near Okinawa, the usually training area of the North Sea Fleet.

    in reply to: Stealth and Drop Tanks #2239182
    plumberunion
    Participant

    oh, nvm.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240324
    plumberunion
    Participant

    hve you read the sources of that wiki art ? That does not look trustworthy

    take the detail with a grain of salt. but the submarine base is there, and nuclear subs have been photographed there.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240325
    plumberunion
    Participant

    at this time, no. alarmists in many countries see the sinister plot of the PLA behind every port development project involving Chinese company of capital ranging from Pakistan to Panama. the truth is, the main areas of Chinese maritime interests are close to home, Diaoyu Island, Taiwan and South China Sea. long range voyages by the PLAN are usually show of flag and training missions. each of the 14 naval escort task forces sent to fight Somalian pirates are accompanied by one underway replenishment ship. the main port of call for fuel and basic supplies is Aden, but other commercial ports in the region are also used. Seychelles was in the news a while back, when its government publicly invited China to establish a naval base there. China hasn’t taken up the offer so far. PLAN is not interested in forward basing its ships, the long voyage from China to Africa is kinda the point. These escort missions are mainly training missions. PLAN uses a different pair of ships for each task force, so more crews can get some experiences.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240542
    plumberunion
    Participant

    The most important strategic development is the construction of a nuclear submarine base in Hainan Southern China. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yulin_Naval_Base
    Previously all the nuclear boats were deployed with the North Sea Fleet.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240961
    plumberunion
    Participant

    Is it me, or does J-20 carry RVV-AE Adder in its side weapons bay?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmJC1Kh7cfE

    that’s suppose to be mockup of PL-10, a new WVR missile under testing, designed for internal carriage. the appearance is very different from previously published images of PL-10, which looked more like ASRAAM. the present configuration looks more like IRIS-T, while the rear fins reminds on of R-27.

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2240965
    plumberunion
    Participant

    http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1211568/china-angered-japan-taiwan-sign-fishing-agreement

    Yup, Taiwan definitely sold out to Japan; China’s calling Taiwan’s declaration to kick out the mainland flagged boats from the area a treason to the Chinese race.

    http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/774416.shtml#.UWiAyMoVxI0

    Taiwan considered the 12nm around Diaoyu Island its territorial water, so of course it has to publicly pledge to expel all foreign fishing vessels, whether from the mainland, Japan or Korea. But Taiwan doesn’t patrol there regularly, so in practice it doesn’t make any difference.
    The fact is today China regularly patrol the water around Diaoyu Island after the perceived escalation by Japan when it nationalized the island, thus making mockery to the Japanese claim of exclusive sovereignty. Japan cannot stop the Chinese patrols, and may not be able to keep up the op tempo necessary to keep pace with increased Chinese patrols. Signing the fisheries deal with Taiwan, thus violating the spirit of its official One China policy may be the only way for Japan to strike back. For the Chinese point of view, the threat of weakening One China policy is would be seen as an even more serious provocation than the nationalization of Diaoyu island. China hasn’t react very strongly so far, perhaps mindful of the tense situation in the Korean peninsular at the moment. But Japan should expect strong diplomatic as well as economic rely soon.
    Of course Japan already paid the price of making concessions to Taiwan. Taiwan of course has every right to play the situation to its advantage. They should demand a gas/oil deal next. Which ever way it works out, the Japanese position is weaker now than it was before the nationalization. and it will become weaker in the future.

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241111
    plumberunion
    Participant

    There is little doubt that if the North starts a full scale attack, SK will launch a full scale invasion in return. The question is, will SK invade if NK does another Yeonpyeong or Cheonon? Does SK think now is the best time to initiate a full scale war based on their estimate that NK nuke is not weaponized yet?
    You haven’t presented evidences to support that. The articles you linked all talk about reaction to a full scale North attack. Also Strategypage is basically worthless as a source, and that article doesn’t cite its source either. But there is some indication that the current South Korean government is will act more aggressively in response to NK provocation, perhaps more than its ally the United States is comfortable with.

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241302
    plumberunion
    Participant

    This is why the defense minister is trying to sell an invasion to public now, saying that it would be over quickly and relatively cheaply

    Now you understand the context of this whole situation.

    What’s your source that Defense Minister Kim Kwan-Jin favors invading the north?

    even NK propaganda is only accusing him of advocating retaliatory strikes rather than full invasion.
    http://www.naenara.com.kp/en/news/news_view.php?19+4828

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241319
    plumberunion
    Participant

    I think certain elements in the SK government do share Slowman’s dangerous vision. Notice how recently Washington have disagreed with SK publicly over estimate of NK’s nuclear capability. http://news.yahoo.com/south-korea-casts-doubt-north-korea-miniaturizing-nuclear-020117676.html
    Whose estimate is more accurate is irrelevant. Washington is saying it is already too late to invade NK. SK is saying no, this may be our last opportunity to invade before their nuke is weaponized.

    Kerry is in Seoul now to try to calm things down.

    Imagining if the fat man in the north decide to launch a missile or some other action that results in SK death. South decides to seize the opportunity and invade.

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241347
    plumberunion
    Participant

    now I wonder who is the crazy one :rolleyes:

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241403
    plumberunion
    Participant

    yes, along with mine fields and electric fences. anyone with military experience will tell you passive barriers are useless without firepower to back it up. plan on doing a lot of shooting desperate civilians.

    with your logic, conquest of NK is easy, integration of NK will be easy, the conclusion would be, let’s seize the opportunity and invade now! if a significant percentage of SK population share your view, no wonder NK want the nuke.

    in reply to: how could North Korea use its air power in an attack? #2241415
    plumberunion
    Participant

    oh great, so the plan is a build a Korean Wall :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Tools of a Chinese Way of War #2242713
    plumberunion
    Participant

    Of course Taiwan won’t say it will drop its claims(Taiwan may give Diaoyu Island away in exchange for Japan’s recognition of Taiwan), but Taiwan will obviously not raise this issue from now on.

    This allows Japan to focus its attention on China’s assault.

    The Taiwanese position the same as China’s. The sovereignty question can be shelved in order to resource co-management negotiation to take place. This is what happened with this deal.
    The CCP cannot back down on the territorial disputes (Diaoyu Island and South China Sea) because it inherited the territorial claims from the ROC when the KMT controlled the mainland. ROC’s claim to South China Sea is the same of PRC. It actually controls the largest island in the South China Sea to this day. After the experience of the past century, any Chinese government that doesn’t defend Chinese territorial claims will immediately lose all legitimacy.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 111 total)