True, I am sat here now watching the wind and the trees blowing around.
I am a bit annoyed though, I had to leave the pub in town to get home before all the transport was canceled.
😡
I have just bought FS2004 for a bit of a play and I was quite disappointed by the aircraft selection…..Mind you I only paid 5 quid for it here in honkers.
I am not to sure how many airlines are using it at the moment, but it is fantastic. No more HF and a simple button press for a full position report.
CPDLC rocks..
wysi,
Do you have CPDLC in your machines?
It is the best. Bringing HF to an end.
NOT HF, don’t talk to me about HF. DAMN HF, BLOODY HF.
damn thing…won’t let me post the picture
Martin,
Good luck with your selection process.
If you get through, this is what you will be looking at for a very long time. FL380 at Mach .847.
Good luck.
Sc………………………………………………..
I am on the pax fleet (747-400) but they can rosta us on to the cargo fleet as well. Not done it myself yet, but some friends have.
I will answer this as best I can as I have to go out in a couple of mins so here is a brief explanation.
Ive heard in the last few years that airliners have switched over to GPS navigation instruments,and Id like to hear from some of the pilots here what that has added in navigation capability.
Well not quite instruments but GPS updates our FMS. It is very accurate at navigating, so much so when we are in the cruise we sometimes put a one mile offset in to the FMS which makes the plane fly one mile off the FMS course, just in case we have another aircraft at the same level then we would miss it by a mile. Just as a back up.
For example I hear its possible to take off and land the plane with zero visability, entirely by instruments.
This has been available for many years, it’s more of an autopilot capability than GPS for landing. For the take off, you still need a certain amount of vis as you need to steer the aircraft.
Has the new GPS navigation taken over traditional instruments like altimeter, airspeed indicater, artificial horizon, rate of climb indicater, etc?
No, most of the instruments in the 747-400 are fed info from the Air Data Computer.
Like would new “glass” cockpits have instrument readings all fed from GPS?
Again, the ADC.
Hope this helps.
Good luck to them, it’s about time Auringy had some competition.
Hi there Charley
Here is the cargo flights.
Mon CX037/038 HKG/DEL/LHR/CDG/HKG
Tue CX037/038 HKG/DEL/MXP/HKG
Hope this helps.
Those pilots must have skipped past the NOTAM’s before going flying.
Martin_EGTK,
You are correct, too many people put too much pressure on themselves regarding their exams. When it comes to applying for a flying job it is the aviation qualifications and experience that matter. I don’t have many qualifications from school and it never did me any harm. But, this does’t mean you should slack off at school. Try the best you can.
Re: Air Luxor Tristar Incident
Originally posted by wannabe pilot
How on Earth could 2 qualified pilots manage to do this?It seems silly that they should be any where near the plane, let alone flying the thing.
Well, the aircraft might have been caught in wind shear or wake turbulence for starters.
Originally posted by monster500
sin-frankfurt fits that catergory nicely.
Quite right Monster.
All my flying is Ultra long haul, approx 12 hours in duration.