dark light

US Agent

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 610 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus to assemble A320 in USA #536948
    US Agent
    Participant

    “Sooo, tell us more about this new assembly plant in Alabama…..”
    (as a scarfaced, bespeckled interrogator takes out his nunchuck looking coat hanger) 😉

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2012 #2323481
    US Agent
    Participant

    Syrian MiG-23 in action

    >> click here <<

    A picture released by the official Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) in December 2011 shows a Syrian [MiG-23] aircraft. A huge explosion on Saturday rocked a Syrian military airport on the outskirts of the capital, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported. (AFP Photo/-)

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2335397
    US Agent
    Participant

    Giovanni de Briganti

    This guy is one of the primary reasons I dislike EADS and find most of it’s backers arrogant and in need of a good ol Americano ****-kicking…

    The US Air Force’s Tanker Gamble

    EADS, although understandably frustrated that it has now lost a contract it had won so decisively in 2008, needs only to sit back and wait until it can bid on the two other tanker replacement contracts, KC-Y and KC-Z, by which time Boeing’s performance on the KC-X will have become a matter of record.

    Finally, it is worth noting that, despite all the hysterical rhetoric to the contrary, the issue of subsidies did not even come up, given the margin of Boeing’s victory. The more extravagant claims by some pundits that “illegal” government subsidies would allow EADS to underbid Boeing and to win unfairly were shown to be just the ill-informed, partisan rants they were.

    EADS has been and will continue to be subsidized and it gave them a huge pricing advantage….FACT!!!

    The USAF made the RIGHT CHOICE…so suck on it Briganti!!!! :p

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336259
    US Agent
    Participant

    EADS does a trememdous job with its limited experience…I predict they’ll probably win the next USAF tanker replacement at the end of the century. :diablo:

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336303
    US Agent
    Participant

    Let’s face it, EADS was trying to swim in the deep end without its floaties….this decision was for the best. :p

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336314
    US Agent
    Participant

    Maybe this was debunked a while back and I missed it, but wasn’t there something about the 767 being the right size for most of the USAF bases both home and abroad?

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336342
    US Agent
    Participant

    congrats to Obama and Boeing. Chicago wins again!

    Now if only the Cubs can pull off an even bigger miracle…. 😀

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336350
    US Agent
    Participant

    My official reaction…

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/sgt_schlappy/flair.gif

    in reply to: Boeing KC-X Victory (Merged) #2336579
    US Agent
    Participant

    seriously, if they’re offering a smaller plane and have a significant fuel-burn advantage, why the heck do they cost so much more?

    Airbus is pulling their pants down to their ankles in order to get the deal…. Boeing has homecourt advantage (ie the patriotic American taxpayer on it’s side) so it doesn’t have to pull theirs all the way down.

    :diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #292440
    US Agent
    Participant

    There is bound to be “life” in abundance elsewhere in the universe but I do not believe that any form of sentient “alien” has ever visited the earth. As to whether we will achieve in reality what we see on film in fantasy is pure conjecture, but given that we have several millenia to do so, it would seem more than likely. And no doubt at some point in the future the “little green men” will come a’calling.

    Not if (89959) 2002 NT7 has anthing to say about it…

    😉

    in reply to: UFOs – Something for everyone #1885152
    US Agent
    Participant

    There is bound to be “life” in abundance elsewhere in the universe but I do not believe that any form of sentient “alien” has ever visited the earth. As to whether we will achieve in reality what we see on film in fantasy is pure conjecture, but given that we have several millenia to do so, it would seem more than likely. And no doubt at some point in the future the “little green men” will come a’calling.

    Not if (89959) 2002 NT7 has anthing to say about it…

    😉

    in reply to: Boeing boss green-lights all-new next generation narrowbody #499997
    US Agent
    Participant

    Doubt it. Mazda used to sell a little car in New Zealand in the 1970’s called the Mazda 808. I suppose they must still have the rights.
    I reckon the ‘Stratoliner 2’, after the fifties prop-liner, would be better.

    Are you stating that Mazda could actually buy the rights to the number “808”… :confused:

    in reply to: Indian Air Force- News & D iscussion #15 #2357673
    US Agent
    Participant

    So, you honestly believe it’s simply poor “marketing” that’s holding the Dhruv back from winning more international orders?

    Interesting.

    in reply to: Boeing Celebrates Final Assembly of 1,000th 767 #509383
    US Agent
    Participant

    Congrats Mr. 767-1001… 😎

    in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2334393
    US Agent
    Participant

    http://img.cjdby.com/attachments_cd/month_1012/1012292345572a4e71b9860d9e.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 610 total)