dark light

US Agent

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 610 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese J-XX/14/20 p.2 #2334397
    US Agent
    Participant

    http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/attachments/Mon_1012/27_6796_849e9e6a76b786e.jpg

    in reply to: Washington selects Mi-17 to Afghanistan #2334403
    US Agent
    Participant

    PLEASE!!!!!!!! If you post in english…..LEARN english!!!!!!!!

    Concur!

    in reply to: Embraer KC-390 #2334404
    US Agent
    Participant

    I predict that less that 100 will actually be delivered when all is said and done.

    in reply to: Which system should the US marines give up? #2344339
    US Agent
    Participant

    The MV-22 isn’t going any where…the USMC is fully committed to it, and that’s that.

    in reply to: Best/Worst looking military jet. #2486395
    US Agent
    Participant

    RA-5C Vigilante. A real beauty, IMHO.

    I second that!!

    Pioneer

    I third it!!!

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2492828
    US Agent
    Participant

    When was the last time Australia built anything of consequence Johnny?

    in reply to: KC767, KC330….what latest? #2492851
    US Agent
    Participant

    You are right on every point except the us taxpayer, They simply will not see the logic in this argument. They will see it as non us vs us.

    Just as the French and Germans would see it if a Boeing aircraft were picked over EADS for any of their air force contracts. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Continental order more 777's and 737's #550579
    US Agent
    Participant

    B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L

    And I completely agree…for them to merge with UA would be a travesty.

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2042783
    US Agent
    Participant

    You are not suggesting it is available for the “friendly” price of $1, are you ?

    I bet something could be worked out. 😉

    in reply to: INS Vikramaditya delayed until 2011! #2042828
    US Agent
    Participant

    An additional $1.2B…?!!!

    Probably best to cut their losses and invest that money in a superior platform.

    I believe the USN will be decommissioning a carrier in the not too distant future if the IN is interested in making an offer, of course, some “minor” alterations and refurbishment will need to be made prior to transfer and service induction. 😀

    http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/63.htm

    in reply to: Le Bourget 2007 #519106
    US Agent
    Participant

    Today’s order for 50 NH-90 split between Germany (42) and Belgium (8) can be considered a mayor order. If I am not mistaken the first export order for the NH-90?

    Sure, I suppose…but its not as “major” as an order for, say, 24 Typhoons or 10 C-17s would of been.

    in reply to: Epitome #519538
    US Agent
    Participant

    I think it’s amusing that while B promotes a realistic communal approach to solving the problem, A simply uses it as an opportunity to try and sell more aircraft.

    In other words, one is being pragmatic…and the other, selfish.

    in reply to: Le Bourget 2007 #519547
    US Agent
    Participant

    When was the last time there was a major military order announced at one of these air shows?

    ……………………………………………………..http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v333/sgt_schlappy/avatar-eyebrowed.gif……………………………………………………………….

    in reply to: Le Bourget 2007 #520104
    US Agent
    Participant

    When was the last time there was a major military order announced at one of these air shows?

    in reply to: Le Bourget 2007 #520491
    US Agent
    Participant

    Here’s some interesting news related to the above…

    Away from the rivalry between Boeing and Airbus, Rolls-Royce PLC said Monday it had received the largest-ever firm engine order for its civil aerospace business from Qatar. The $5.6 billion order is for Trent XWB engines to power Qatar’s new fleet of 80 Airbus A350 XWB twinjets, with deliveries beginning in 2013.

    http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2007/06/18/ap3831712.html

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 610 total)