And it appears they are going to need a big year from the commerical side with all of the defense contracts currently (and yet to be) under investigation. 😮
And it appears they are going to need a big year from the commerical side with all of the defense contracts currently (and yet to be) under investigation. 😮
US Agent.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t it sometime in your County’s recent history when Americans were told it would be better to be dead than red? ;
Or have I got it the wrong way round?
Regards,
kev35
Communist RED = bad
Republican RED = good
😉
Distiller and seahawk expressed it best as far as I’m concerned. 😎
got Pics [o]f the little bird
MH-6 Little Bird
I was asking the THE REST OF THE WORLD not America!
With regards to our President…nobody outside of America matters. :p
BAE Delivers New Laser for JSF
Lockheed Martin Takes Delivery of Critical New Laser for JSF Electro-Optical Targeting System
(Source: Lockheed Martin; issued Feb. 23, 2005)
ORLANDO, Fla. — Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) team received the first laser system for the aircraft’s Electro-Optical Targeting System (EOTS) from BAE Systems Avionics at a special event in Edinburgh, Scotland today. BAE Systems Avionics, a subcontractor to Lockheed Martin on the JSF program, presented the high-powered laser on schedule.
The F-35 JSF will provide the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps, and the United Kingdom’s Royal Navy and Royal Air Force affordable and stealthy tactical aircraft for the 21st century. The JSF EOTS laser system enables precision-range measurements and designates tactical targets for laser guided weapons.
“BAE’s accomplishment is a major milestone toward the successful delivery of the JSF EOTS, a system that will provide important new capabilities to aircrews,” said Tom Simmons, vice president of Fire Control at Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. “We have come together on our JSF EOTS team to bring the laser experience and expertise critical to JSF program success.”
Nick Franks, Group Managing Director at BAE Systems Avionics, added, “This milestone on the JSF laser program is testimony to the close collaboration between the program teams of Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control and BAE Systems Avionics.”
10 large carriers with air groups against 2 medium sized and 2 small ones and 2 tiny ones.
No big deal for the US.
All we would need is 1 Battle Group…

the ‘mutual’ defence agreement was aimed at the USSR, and even your link pointed out its cold war origins.
True…but that doesn’t mean it wouldn’t be used as justification for the US to come to Japan’s defense.
china is no iraq or afganistan, and any confrontation between china and japan will be about disputed land, not a fight to stop a chinese invation of japan. so do you seriously think that under those circumstances the american people will be willing to send thousands of its sons and daughters out to die in the pacific because japan wanted to plant their flag on an uninhabitable island?
Only if the confrontation escalates beyond a simple “stand off”…which it most definitely could.
Remember, most Americans did not want the US to liberate Iraq…but we did. 😉
its a highly debatable issue whether america will even send troops to fight and die to stop a chinese move on taiwan.
You keep telling yourself that if it makes you feel better…but don’t count on it.
so japan is not going to risk so much (basically their whole navy and air force) all on the premise that uncle sam will be so selfless and come to their aid at such great costs (and thats only the military costs, the economic costs of a head on military confrontation between china and america will be many times worse for both).
You talk as though Japan can’t handle itself? …and that America is too frighten to take you on militarily if necessarily? :rolleyes:
no, if china and japan did come to blows over disputed islands, america will condamn china’s ‘aggression’, call for restrint on both sides and demand a cease fire, while providing intel support and shipping in new weapons for japan. but they will most likely only interfer if its looks like the conflict is about to spill out into an all out war and really threaten the american economy.
I think you have us confused with the EU.
:p
Originally Posted by rdc1000
Also…have you seen Farenheit 911
Yes and I loved that bit with the guitar during the credits about 10minutes in with Bush and the others being made up for the camera, took me ages to find that artist!
I actually preferred the sequel much better. 😉

Not trying to turn this into a political thread, but does anybody like him?!
I certainly hate his guts
Apparently quite a few do…(including myself)…take note of the RED counties…

I wouldent take the Japanese seriously since they always blow hot air whenever there is some threat but we never see any action. But I wouldent say the same for the chinese considering Korean war and Vietnam…
You realize the Japan’s post-WWII constitution forbids them from engaging in military conflicts outside of their homeland correct?
With that said, I forsee Japan amending their current constitution in the not too distant future. The threat from North Korea and the rising military power of China will most certainly force them to do so from a geopolitical standpoint.
JMHO
Boeing’s big boost for Little Bird
Flight International
15 Feb 2005
Boeing has agreed to support MD Helicopters’ (MDHI) production of the MH-6 Little Bird as part of its bid for the US Army’s Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter (ARH) contest, thereby providing a lifeline to the financially troubled, Arizona-based manufacturer.
The agreement essentially underwrites MDHI and provides stability to Boeing’s ARH bid. However, the agreement is still vital, with or without an ARH win, says MDHI chief executive Henk Schaeken, who adds that the deal “also allows us to restructure our dealings with Boeing and allows us to reduce our debt position”.
The Boeing-funded improvements to the rotor blades, crew seats and configuration of the Little Bird could also “come back into our commercial products”, Schaeken says. The initial ARH requirement calls for “at least” 368 aircraft. Boeing would be prime contractor on the “Mission Enhanced” MH-6M, with airframes assembled at MDHI’s Mesa site and completed at the adjacent Boeing AH-64 Apache assembly site.
The deal relieves MDHI of outstanding debt to Boeing and is also expected to strengthen MDHI’s renewed search for additional investors and restore customer confidence in the MDHI product line, says Schaeken. He adds that the current order backlog is around 25 aircraft of which approximately 12 are Explorers and the remainder single-engined MD500/600s.
GUY NORRIS / ANAHEIM
plawolf
Not that I agree with your take on which air force/navy is stronger, but irregardless, do you seriously think it would just be Japan vs China in any military confrontation near Japanese territory?
U.S. and Japan Mutual Defense Assistance Agreement
Think again. 😉
I don’t see what you mean by hopeless…
The question is that if Japan is willing to upset Beijing and jepordize it’s market interests in China over the islands.
You have to take into consideration that the only reason Japan is slopping out of its stagnation is because of new opportunities and business venture in China. If the situation gets ugly, well you’ll see corps like sony and panasonic take a huge toll not to mention the Jap auto industries in China as well.
A) Not “hopeless”….helpless. 😉
B) What I meant was that the PLAN has been flexing it’s muscle in and around the South China Sea when it’s up against navies from Vietnam, the Pilippines, etc., but that won’t work with JSMDF. China’s naval muscle isn’t big enough to intimidate Japan…yet.
C) China is smart enough to know that a “trade war” is also a no-win situation…since they do not hold all of the cards from an economic perspective (i.e. Japan could retaliate by withdrawing it’s investment in the mainland, and possibly shifting it over to Taiwan.)