Originally posted by Geforce
Especially now that the truth is being told to the public. Lies, all lies. There are no bloody WMD’s in Iraq.WMD’s = Saddam Hussein and his cronies.
And indeed your president doesn’t take crap from nobody, that’s about all you can say about him. He’ll probably never win a Pullitzer-price (as if he could pronounce the word :D)
At least he would never get down on all-fours to win one unlike your PM. 😉
Originally posted by Geforce
Cool, you did some research. means you’are already smarter than Bush because Bush didn’t even know the name of the “president” of Spain (Anzar :D); CONGRATULATIONS. You must be very frustrated, being so intelligent yourself, and having such a stupid president. At least I would.
I’m much happier with my “won’t take crap from anyone” President than you must be with your “French boot-licking nimrod” of a Prime Minister.
😀
Originally posted by Geforce
Cool, you did some research. means you’are already smarter than Bush because Bush didn’t even know the name of the “president” of Spain (Anzar :D); CONGRATULATIONS. You must be very frustrated, being so intelligent yourself, and having such a stupid president. At least I would.
I’m much happier with my “won’t take crap from anyone” President than you must be with your “French boot-licking nimrod” of a Prime Minister.
😀
Originally posted by Geforce
I mean, everyone is a genious compared to Bush.
I beg to differ…President Bush is a MENSA candidate when compared to PM Verhofstadt.

Originally posted by Geforce
I mean, everyone is a genious compared to Bush.
I beg to differ…President Bush is a MENSA candidate when compared to PM Verhofstadt.

Originally posted by plawolf
us agent“No, we do not believe that China is “bent on world domination”…simply because they do not have the capacity to do so…not now, now 50 years from now. The US will remain superior to them…militarily, economically and politically…for the remainder of this century at the very least. “
we’ll see.
Nice come back…you must have been captain of your high school debating team huh?
Originally posted by plawolf
“However, China is becoming a regional power, and this is concerning from the aspect that the CCP is not transparant in its intentions…and the fact that they are beginning to bully their neighbors around with their new-found military muscle means America must act as a PLA counter-weight. ”thats bush propaganda mate. every time u make some redicoulous claim i ask for proof yet u fall silient, i suspect this will be no excpetion. care to give me any sort of realible proof as how china is ‘bullying’ our neghbours?
chinese fishing boats are being seized almost on a monthly basis by indonisia, tailand and malaysia etc, sometimes in international waters. yet u dont see the chinese fleet there ‘bullying’ those countries do u?
the rest of ur posts is so crap is not worth wasting any of my time on.
Propaganda huh?
Here’s some facts for ya…
web site: South China Sea Virtual Library
excerpt…
Military conflicts in the South China Sea
There have been several cases of military intimidation in recent years, in addition to China’s use of military force against Vietnamese troops to enforce its claim to the Paracels in 1974. One confrontation occurred between the Chinese and Vietnamese over the occupation of Fiery Cross Reef (Yung Shu Jiao) in 1988, at which time the PRC sank three Vietnamese vessels, killing seventy-two people.
Another incident began with the discovery that the Chinese had occupied Mischief Reef, a circular reef within 200 miles of the Philippine island of Palawan, and within the area claimed by the Philippine government as its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This involved encounters between military vessels from the Philippines and the PRC in March and April 1995. It was the aptly named Mischief Reef confrontation that has catalyzed the most recent wave of interest and concern over the Spratly Islands issue (Sherry, 1998). These and other recent conflicts are summarized in Table 6. Disputes over Drilling and Exploration in the South China Sea, and Table 7. Recent Military Clashes in the South China Sea.
Here’s more…
web site:
ICE: Spratly Islands Dispute/Conflict
excerpt…
Disputes in the Spratly Islands have revolved around overlapping territorial claims, particularly where potential gas and oil reserves are involved.
Disputes have become more frequent in recent years, in part the result of burgeoning energy demands in China.
Those are just a few.
Looking forward to your “enlightening” reply PLAwolf. :rolleyes:
Originally posted by plawolf
us agent“No, we do not believe that China is “bent on world domination”…simply because they do not have the capacity to do so…not now, now 50 years from now. The US will remain superior to them…militarily, economically and politically…for the remainder of this century at the very least. “
we’ll see.
Nice come back…you must have been captain of your high school debating team huh?
Originally posted by plawolf
“However, China is becoming a regional power, and this is concerning from the aspect that the CCP is not transparant in its intentions…and the fact that they are beginning to bully their neighbors around with their new-found military muscle means America must act as a PLA counter-weight. ”thats bush propaganda mate. every time u make some redicoulous claim i ask for proof yet u fall silient, i suspect this will be no excpetion. care to give me any sort of realible proof as how china is ‘bullying’ our neghbours?
chinese fishing boats are being seized almost on a monthly basis by indonisia, tailand and malaysia etc, sometimes in international waters. yet u dont see the chinese fleet there ‘bullying’ those countries do u?
the rest of ur posts is so crap is not worth wasting any of my time on.
Propaganda huh?
Here’s some facts for ya…
web site: South China Sea Virtual Library
excerpt…
Military conflicts in the South China Sea
There have been several cases of military intimidation in recent years, in addition to China’s use of military force against Vietnamese troops to enforce its claim to the Paracels in 1974. One confrontation occurred between the Chinese and Vietnamese over the occupation of Fiery Cross Reef (Yung Shu Jiao) in 1988, at which time the PRC sank three Vietnamese vessels, killing seventy-two people.
Another incident began with the discovery that the Chinese had occupied Mischief Reef, a circular reef within 200 miles of the Philippine island of Palawan, and within the area claimed by the Philippine government as its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). This involved encounters between military vessels from the Philippines and the PRC in March and April 1995. It was the aptly named Mischief Reef confrontation that has catalyzed the most recent wave of interest and concern over the Spratly Islands issue (Sherry, 1998). These and other recent conflicts are summarized in Table 6. Disputes over Drilling and Exploration in the South China Sea, and Table 7. Recent Military Clashes in the South China Sea.
Here’s more…
web site:
ICE: Spratly Islands Dispute/Conflict
excerpt…
Disputes in the Spratly Islands have revolved around overlapping territorial claims, particularly where potential gas and oil reserves are involved.
Disputes have become more frequent in recent years, in part the result of burgeoning energy demands in China.
Those are just a few.
Looking forward to your “enlightening” reply PLAwolf. :rolleyes:
Originally posted by Geforce
What a bunch of pathetic lowlifes are overrunning the forum these days. Wow, seems like it’s time for a clean up here.
I agree…lets start with you!
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Geforce
What a bunch of pathetic lowlifes are overrunning the forum these days. Wow, seems like it’s time for a clean up here.
I agree…lets start with you!
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by plawolf
zippo:y bother? theres no convicing them cos they just dony listen (or read) what u say. they dont judge ur arguments based on merit but rather if they personally agree with what u say or like it. there is just no point wasting time arguing with the likes of them.
Just like a CCP courtroom huh?
😉
Originally posted by plawolf
zippo:y bother? theres no convicing them cos they just dony listen (or read) what u say. they dont judge ur arguments based on merit but rather if they personally agree with what u say or like it. there is just no point wasting time arguing with the likes of them.
Just like a CCP courtroom huh?
😉
Originally posted by Zippo
Nobody expects you not to defend your country.You understand of course that
THAT’S EVERYBODY’S RIGHT AND NOT EXCLUSIVE TO THE AMERICANS.
So, once more: If you have any arguments in defence of your country’s actions, put them forward.
If you continue on the LOCK ‘EM UP, KILL- THEM -ALL- BEACAUSE -THEY- ARE- SCUM line, then,
that’s Nazi talk and someone will point it out to you
I’ve NEVER stated it wasn’t anyones right to defend their country…so chill out.
As far as “LOCK’EM UP, KILL-THEM-ALL-blah,blah,blah”…those locked up were caught taking arms againts the US, they were found consorting with KNOWN terrorists and terrorist organizations…they will remain were they are until they repent and begin to give us the information we want and show us that they will not revert back to similar actions in the future. The liberal, socialist Euros can do as you like with their terroists (ie SET THEM FREE and PRAY THAT THEY ONLY ATTACK US TARGETS), but we in America will handle the ones we capture as we see fit.
Originally posted by Zippo
In case you haven’t heard the news, the you-know-who is still at large and in the video production business,
along with the rest of his top ranks.The wretched collection you have in the cages are at best scrapped
from the bottom of the barrel:100-year olds, 16 -year olds and assorted “foot soldiers”.
“news”?…LAUGH. Please show me your documentation to support this complete tripe…or stop posting it. You are only regurgitating what you hear from your liberal media.
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Zippo
Nobody expects you not to defend your country.You understand of course that
THAT’S EVERYBODY’S RIGHT AND NOT EXCLUSIVE TO THE AMERICANS.
So, once more: If you have any arguments in defence of your country’s actions, put them forward.
If you continue on the LOCK ‘EM UP, KILL- THEM -ALL- BEACAUSE -THEY- ARE- SCUM line, then,
that’s Nazi talk and someone will point it out to you
I’ve NEVER stated it wasn’t anyones right to defend their country…so chill out.
As far as “LOCK’EM UP, KILL-THEM-ALL-blah,blah,blah”…those locked up were caught taking arms againts the US, they were found consorting with KNOWN terrorists and terrorist organizations…they will remain were they are until they repent and begin to give us the information we want and show us that they will not revert back to similar actions in the future. The liberal, socialist Euros can do as you like with their terroists (ie SET THEM FREE and PRAY THAT THEY ONLY ATTACK US TARGETS), but we in America will handle the ones we capture as we see fit.
Originally posted by Zippo
In case you haven’t heard the news, the you-know-who is still at large and in the video production business,
along with the rest of his top ranks.The wretched collection you have in the cages are at best scrapped
from the bottom of the barrel:100-year olds, 16 -year olds and assorted “foot soldiers”.
“news”?…LAUGH. Please show me your documentation to support this complete tripe…or stop posting it. You are only regurgitating what you hear from your liberal media.
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Hand87_5
I guess that the kind of music which pi55es me off the most , is the one served by US Agent since 2 months.
Perhaps you should consider changing the radio station then…cause the hits from US Agent are just gonna keep on coming. 😎
Originally posted by Hand87_5
I guess that the kind of music which pi55es me off the most , is the one served by US Agent since 2 months.
Perhaps you should consider changing the radio station then…cause the hits from US Agent are just gonna keep on coming. 😎