dark light

US Agent

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 610 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Airbus sales eclipsed by Boeing in 2006. #575880
    US Agent
    Participant

    I think the truly telling numbers would be total sales by purchase price…(of course we can only go by list pricing)…where Boeing probably ran away from Airbus for the second year in a row.

    in reply to: UFO spotted over O'Hare #582544
    US Agent
    Participant

    No…no one had the presence of mind…(or the available technology)…to take a photo or video of it.

    Plus, it didn’t show up on radar according to the controllers, so… 😮

    in reply to: Australia to buy 24 F-18F's? #2540176
    US Agent
    Participant

    Question- If, you are Australia why would you want 24 Super Hornets when you could have 18 Raptors? [B][COLOR=”Red”]Further, in 2014 wouldn’t you rather have a Fleet of 18 Raptors and 75 Lightnings or would you prefer 24 Super Hornets and 75 Lightnings???[/B][/COLOR]:eek:

    More like 24 Super Hornets…or…8 Raptors.

    *And lets not forget about savings in continuity, logistics, support, training, maintenance, etc vs a whole new aircraft.

    in reply to: US Merger Updates #584844
    US Agent
    Participant

    US Airways chief hanging tight on its offer for Delta

    Associated Press
    Published December 29, 2006

    source link

    ATLANTA — US Airways has no intention right now of increasing its $8.4 billion offer for Delta Air Lines, and it can’t see itself backing out of its pursuit for any reason, Chief Executive Doug Parker said Thursday.

    US Agent
    Participant

    There’s a drama-queenesque feel to this thread.

    Nic

    Agreed.

    People who feel the need to announce they’re leaving a forum are simply crying out for attention and threads like this are nothing more than a way of trying to find out how much they were liked by other members and who even gave a damn about them or their posts.

    JMHO

    in reply to: US Merger Updates #588054
    US Agent
    Participant

    Delta turns down offer by US Airways

    From Tribune news services
    Published December 20, 2006

    source link

    ATLANTA — Delta Air Lines Inc. on Tuesday rejected a hostile $8.38 billion merger proposal from US Airways Group Inc. and said it plans to exit bankruptcy on its own in the first six months of 2007 with a value of as much as $12 billion.

    The US Airways offer is unlikely to receive antitrust approval, is based on flawed economic assumptions and would result in the biggest debt in the industry, said Delta, the nation’s third-largest carrier. US Airways said it will continue to pursue a takeover.

    Delta wasn’t convinced by US Airways’ argument that a combination creating the world’s largest airline would bring $1.65 billion in annual savings and new revenue. Executives at Delta have expressed skepticism about US Airways’ offer since it was announced Nov. 15.

    In a conference call with analysts Tuesday, Delta Chief Executive Gerald Grinstein said: “US Airways is the worst of all potential merger partners. Their proposal is a bad deal for Delta and its creditors.”

    US Airways CEO Doug Parker said his company’s offer of $4 billion in cash and 78.5 million US Airways shares, coupled with cost savings and new revenue, “is significantly greater” than the value of Delta’s plan to its creditors and future shareholders.

    “We remain a disciplined and determined bidder for Delta,” Parker said.

    Delta’s board unanimously rejected the US Airways offer. The carrier faces pressure to consolidate as other carriers consider mergers. AirTran Holdings Inc. made a hostile $290 million bid for Midwest Air Group Inc. on Dec. 13, and UAL Corp.’s United Airlines has held talks with Continental Airlines Inc.

    “It will be extremely difficult for this merger to go forward,” James Corridore, an analyst for Standard & Poor’s, said in a note. US Airways’ “options are to raise its bid, try and sway creditors or retract its bid.”

    in reply to: US Merger Updates #590828
    US Agent
    Participant

    Help sought to ease way toward merger

    McClatchy-Tribune News Service
    Published December 9, 2006
    source link

    DETROIT — Northwest Airlines wants to hire a consultant that specializes in mergers.

    The move adds to speculation that the carrier could merge with another airline before it emerges from bankruptcy protection. Last month, US Airways said it wants to merge with Delta Air Lines.

    It’s too early to say what a merger would mean for travelers. One potential partner could be Continental Airlines. Continental’s routes across the Atlantic and Latin America would complement Northwest’s routes to Asia, said airline consultant Robert Mann. But he said Northwest’s rocky labor relations could be an obstacle.

    Evercore Group would help Northwest study “broad strategic alternatives in the airline industry,” the airline said in a court filing. The company helped broker General Motors Corp.’s sale of its majority stake in its lending arm GMAC and has advised UAL Corp., parent of United Airlines.

    in reply to: First C-17 Arrives In Australia #2509064
    US Agent
    Participant

    Talk about a work of art! Really, a high quality product…………..:D

    The aircraft ain’t bad either! :diablo:

    in reply to: A350 Go Ahead! #593319
    US Agent
    Participant

    The A350 XWB is going to be financed predominantly from the company cash flows, with strong contribution from the Power8 programme and from risk sharing partners.

    source link

    Just as long as those “risk sharing partners” do not include the governments of France & Germany. :diablo:

    in reply to: 787 test flight #593321
    US Agent
    Participant

    Thank you for the benefit of your expert advice, Tommy.

    :dev2:

    in reply to: The 2018 bomber. #2544022
    US Agent
    Participant

    I’d bet you even money that the B-1 would be deactivated shortly after 2018.

    in reply to: Yet More A380 Delays (Merged) #517304
    US Agent
    Participant

    Official statement from EADS about the A380: Break-even at 420 units.

    I wonder what it was before all the delays?

    in reply to: Potential A350 delays!! #517498
    US Agent
    Participant

    Not much of a surprise there…they have a bigger problem to tackle at the moment.

    in reply to: Swedish Airforce to acquire 2 C-17s? #2549740
    US Agent
    Participant

    – According to Svenska Dagbladet amongst other newspapers, the armed forces pays about 400 million SEK per year for hiring foreign airlift. Thats about $60 million per year.

    regards,
    Cliff

    That ought to cover the annual fuel bill and windshield wiper fluid for the C-17. 😀

    in reply to: U.S. Naval Aviation Updates #2046373
    US Agent
    Participant

    Navy Gets New High-Tech Choppers

    David Axe | July 28, 2006
    link

    The Navy has received the first four of around 250 advanced helicopters worth $2.5 billion that will replace hundreds of Reagan-era aircraft and change the way it fights on, above and under the sea. Multi-role Helicopter Squadron 41, based at Naval Air Station North Island near San Diego, Calif., accepted four Lockheed Martin and Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawks in January.

    HSM-41 is the West Coast training squadron for the Navy’s light helicopter community. It feeds fully-trained aviators into co-located fleet squadrons that deploy one- or two-aircraft detachments aboard frigates, destroyers and cruisers. With the new helicopter, the squadron is also responsible for writing the training curriculum that will be used throughout the MH-60R’s projected 25-year service life.

    The squadron will begin training the first fleet pilots on the new aircraft in October.

    “We know what the fleet wants at the end … and we work backwards from that,” says HSM-41 skipper Comm. J.C. Shaub, 46. He adds that the MH-60R crews will train to destroy submarines and surface ships, to transport people and supplies and conduct surveillance using radar and passive and infrared sensors.

    The so-called “Romeo” is a development of the venerable Sikorsky SH-60B Seahawk (called “Bravos” by their crews), itself a derivative of the Army’s UH-60A Blackhawk transport from the same company. The Bravo was designed to fly from warships on the open sea, searching out and destroying Soviet nuclear submarines using sonar buoys, a towed magnetic sensor and torpedoes. With the end of the Cold War, the Bravo force evolved, adopting new weapons and sensors to fight small boats on the surface and quiet diesel submarines in shallow coastal waters. By the late 1990s, steadily proliferating threats and an increasingly overloaded airframe meant that it was time for a replacement.

    Enter the Romeo, which will replace not only the SH-60B but also the similar SH-60F as part of a plan to neck down the Navy’s helicopter inventory from seven types to just two.

    “It does everything the Bravo does … but does it with more fidelity and better armament,” HSM-41 skipper Comm. J.C. Shaub says of the Romeo.

    The MH-60R looks a lot like its predecessor — and the first four are in fact rebuilds of surplus Bravos — but inside it’s a completely new aircraft. A dipping sonar improves its ability to detect submarines. A modular cockpit based on digital displays means better situational awareness for a smaller crew. The Romeo is designed to switch between missions while in-flight and, in a pinch, to offload sensors and equipment so it can carry humanitarian supplies or evacuees. It can carry more weapons and has even been tested as an air-to-air fighter against low-flying small aircraft, according to HSM-41 executive officer Comm. Dennis Walsh, 42.

    “These are exciting times,” Walsh says.

    Currently HSM-41 flies 10 Bravos in addition to the four Romeos. It will replace the older aircraft with 11 more Romeos by 2010, leaving the East Coast training squadron to soldier on with Bravos until the Navy transitions to an all-Romeo force sometime after 2012.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 610 total)