If you ask me the JSF is over kill for bombing refugee camps.
Wow…what a really asinine comment. Congratulations! :rolleyes:
Hmm, sounds more like the Virgin Blue board missed the boat and are trying to push the blame elsewhere. :rolleyes:
Sure sounds like it. π
I would suggest Airbus would be able to focus on both the A350 and a A320NG as the A380 starts to generate profits; remember that they are expecting just a single new customer for the A380 each year over the next few years so the breakeven figure may well be acheived within 5 to 7 years (dependent on what discounts, if any, are given).
Of course, it doesn’t hurt having that sweet loan program in place freeing up funds for future projects. :rolleyes:
Well, if there are no objections, maybe we can make this the new 747-8 update thread? Not requesting this gets “sticky” treatment…we’ll leave that to the moderator’s discretion. π
Boeing Names Smiths Aerospace as Supplier for 747-8 Program
Wednesday May 17, 7:00 am ET
Yahoo News
SEATTLE, May 17 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — The Boeing Company (NYSE: BA – News) today announced the selection of Smiths Aerospace to supply the thrust reverser actuator system (TRAS) for the new Boeing 747-8 airplane.
The London-based supplier will design a TRAS using similar technology to the system it provides for the Boeing 777. This continuity will offer Boeing and its 747-8 operators the benefits that result from the improved reliability of a mature product.
Smiths will design and manufacture the TRAS at its Los Angeles facility, with hardware deliveries expected to begin in second-quarter 2007. The TRAS will power the thrust-reverser system currently being developed, certified and produced by Middle River Aircraft Systems.
“Smiths’ extensive knowledge of, and track record with, thrust reverser actuation systems make them the right choice for this critical component of the airplane,” said Jeff Peace, vice president – program manager, 747-8 Program, Boeing Commercial Airplanes. “Together with our growing team of international partners, we continue to progress on making the newest member of our 747 family a reality.”
The 747-8 family, which includes the 747-8 Intercontinental passenger airplane and the 747-8 Freighter, was launched in November 2005 by Cargolux Airlines and Nippon Cargo Airlines.
“Smiths’ thrust reverser actuation system experience and reliability on the Boeing 777 program were strong contributors to winning the 747-8 program. This recent win continues Smiths’ leadership position in thrust reverser actuation technology,” said Dr. John Ferrie, president, Smiths Aerospace.
Additional Information
747-8 Family: The 747-8 is a family of passenger and freighter airplanes that serves the market for airplanes of 400 seats and larger. The 747-8 Intercontinental passenger airplane seats 450 passengers in a typical three-class configuration and offers the lowest seat-mile cost of any passenger airplane. It provides operators a 14,815-km (8,000-nmi) range, 21 percent greater cargo volume and 9 percent lower seat-mile costs compared to the 747-400. The 747-8 Freighter will fly 8,275 km (4,475 nmi) with a maximum structural payload capacity of 140 metric tonnes (154 tons). It offers 16 percent more revenue cargo volume than the 747-400F with slightly greater range. The 747-8 Freighter upholds its predecessor’s legendary efficiency, with equivalent trip costs and 15 percent lower ton-mile costs than the 747-400F. The 747-8 Freighter will enjoy the lowest ton-mile costs of any freighter, giving operators unmatched profit potential. The first 747-8 Freighter will be delivered to launch customer Cargolux in September 2009.
The funny thing is that Airbus will pay catch up with Boeing for years to come. The A380 and the A400M are dubios projects when it comes to commercial success, while Boeing will be selling and deliviering the 787 and the 747-800 rather quickly.
After that Boeing has every time to invest all its power into a 737 replacement. A move Airbus wonΒ΄t be able to counter. The new Boeing will probably kill all A320 sales and will give Boeing market dominance for years to come.
Spot on seahawk…ooops, sorry, not English…RIGHT ON seahawk. π
The US will call the UK’s bluff…because unlike the rest of the world, the US can develop military aircraft without “partners”…especially whiney ones.
Average Taiwanese may not see China as a threat, but they sure see the Chinese Communist Party and PLA as threats.
BINGO!
In Iraq, the Neocons started a war to gain access to the markets of the gulf and to control the Iraqi oil. Why should we support them on that?
Either supply something that support this asinine comment…or go back to drinking your kool-aid. :rolleyes:
First and foremost:
Why do you insist that Beijing would attack the Island of Taiwan?
I mean if you are one of the Islanders, yes, indeed I can understand your
state of mind. But, if you are maybe one of the thousands who had been sold from top to bottom
by Washington’s sales pitches (politics) that Beijing is doing all of this with
the intention of Taiwan in mind — then, how can people be so cruel???
And if you are one of the milliions who have been sold from top to bottom by the Chicoms that Taiwan will be allowed to remain a “renegade province” indefinitely, well, then you have our sympathy. :rolleyes:
Yeah, I saw that yesterday as well. I’m guessing Boeing lost the bid to Airbus A332 tankers?
No…more like the USAF changing its requirement to “tanker/transport” aircraft, so the 777 may be submitted in its place.
Boeing to cease production of 767s
Tribune staff, wire reports
Published February 15, 2006
Link
Despite a stream of recent orders for its 767 wide-body jet, Boeing Co. plans to end production of it without a Pentagon contract for air-refueling tankers, Chief Financial Officer James Bell said Monday. The 767s, which started flying in 1981, are being replaced in Chicago-based Boeing’s lineup in 2008 by the 787 Dreamliner. The company had hoped to build 100 767s for the Air Force as a tanker, but that controversial $23 billion deal was scuttled in 2004 after a procurement scandal. No timetable was given for halting 767 production. The company got 19 new orders for 767s in 2005 and has a backlog of 30.
Not connected to Long Beach, but I don’t think they build the C-17s there any longer…(it was just the early models)…
Ever see the US night attack on Iraq at the start of the war? How many triple A were blindly fired into the air. How many US jets were hit? Not many and certainly none were shot down. So it’s ignorant to say that’s how the F-117 was shot down.
“triple A” = missiles ???
Dismissed.
Boeing Nears 737-900ER Design Completion
(Source: Boeing Co.; issued Jan. 26, 2006)
SEATTLE — Boeing marks an engineering milestone today as company engineers complete 90 percent of the drawings for the newest 737 family member, the 737-900ER.
The milestone means that nearly all of the engineering work necessary to build parts and tools for assembly has been completed and released to manufacturing.
“This is a critical milestone for the airplane as we make the transition from the development phase to the production phase,” said Mike Delaney, 737 chief project engineer. “With most of the drawings complete, our suppliers and fabrication plants can begin manufacturing detailed parts.”
The design milestone was reached right on the target date, as Boeing works to begin final assembly of the first 737-900ER this spring at the company’s Renton, Wash., manufacturing facility.
Launched in July 2005 with a 30-airplane order from Indonesian carrier Lion Air, the 737-900ER is designed to carry up to 215 passengers and fly up to 3,200 nautical miles (5,925 km).
The first 737-900ER is scheduled for delivery in the first half of 2007 after a five-month flight test program, which will include two flight test airplanes.
The newest derivative design incorporates an additional pair of exit doors, a flat rear pressure bulkhead, and aerodynamic and structural design changes that enhance low-speed and cruise performance. These changes include strengthened wings, a two-position tailskid, enhancements to the leading and trailing-edge flap systems, and optional Blended Winglets and auxiliary fuel tanks.
Powered by the CFM International CFM56-7B turbofan engines, the new derivative will have substantial economic advantages over the competing A321 including 9 percent lower operating costs per trip and 7 percent lower operating costs per seat.
And like the F117, someone’s gonna find a vulnerabilty to take it down.
What was that vulnerability again?
Oh, right, just spray the sky with missiles and maybe you’ll get lucky. :rolleyes: