dark light

glitter

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,376 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rafale currently tested in cold conditions #2692919
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Re: Re: lkij

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT

    Steve, get us links of actual cold typhoon tests in norway,it’s all matter here, not a relic pic of traveling fat bugged mock up in norway!

    Perhpas my dear pilot serré can’t read properly what I wrote, so I’ve going to help him

    “Potential customer” = client potentiel

    that’s what I wrote, exactly.

    Now, do you know google pilot ?

    norway + eurofighter.
    Ouch, 1 890 answers.

    Let’s see
    Norway resumes talks with Eurofighter group – Jane’s Military … –

    Norway participates in Eurofighter

    Or even “norvege” and “eurofigher”,
    171 answers.

    Good night pilotight.

    in reply to: Rafale currently tested in cold conditions #2693054
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by F-18 Hamburger
    trying to match Eurofighter’s testing in Norway? Or is there a potential customer that far up north?

    Yep, Norway is a potential customer for the EF2000.

    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Re: Re: Re: lol

    Originally posted by mike currill
    The Foreign Legion.

    That’s what I thought.
    Then
    1) Read more books about the légion
    2) what’s your point ?

    in reply to: Mirage 4000 #2693124
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Tempest
    Great pic. Did someone say Rafale Mk I??

    The airframe importance get down each year.
    What’s important is avionics and radar.
    the mirage 4000 was a mirage 2000 with a better range, nothing more.

    in reply to: Rafale currently tested in cold conditions #2693261
    glitter
    Participant

    And I’m sure this has nothing to do with a potential deal in a near future 😀

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2693288
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Tazzers
    Would it be easy to simply bolt an active array onto a conventional radar set?

    I think the obvious answer is NO.
    But since I don’t know much in radar, I won’t say anything.

    But as I say, I read several times from Thales that for the RBE2 it’s a piece of cake whereas the ECR90 is a technological dead-end.

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2693334
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Tazzers
    No mate if there is anything they are keeping it pretty quiet. Mind you the ECR90 is no flunk its tried and tested, based on the Blue Vixen I think which is a good set.

    For A2A missions, the best features is certainly the range of detection.
    When Thales did the RBE2, without an active array, they knew that the range would be lower but all others strong points of an electronic array would be a plus for the rafale (better reliability, able to work in several modes in the sema etime …) .
    anyway, with mature software, I buy a RBE2 anyday of the week instead of a ECR90.

    Originally posted by Tazzers
    I know there is talk of an AESA for the Typhoon but I don’t know when it will come on line.

    Yes, it’s the AMSAR program which should be finish in 2005.
    The goal is to get cheap active modules for an array.
    Since the RBE2 is already an electronic radar, the rafale team was sure that the active RBE2 would be raedy much earlier than the new EF2000 radar since only the array would be different.

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2693413
    glitter
    Participant

    So, about my question, does anybody heard something about an early AESA for the EF2000 ?

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2693414
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT
    ” 5 Rafale F2: they don’t exist yet!! ”

    si si , zei exist, as the commissionetrreport in this raport at french senat in oct 2003!
    http://www.senat.fr/commission/etr/etrg031117.html#toc2

    i translate, ” and the reporter was enjoying of the delivering of the 5 first rafales F2 for the air force to Mont de Marsan “CEAM”

    they ares in advance of 3 mounths!

    Yes, the 5 rafales F2.
    Sure you saw them Steve, two were on the left behind of the Enterprise, two others in front of the death star and the last hidden behind a Go’ahuld spaceship.

    Yes, as you can see, we, french have got lots of powerful allies 😀

    in reply to: Czech ranking #2693425
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Czech ranking

    Originally posted by m.ileduets

    This might sound cynical now, but I wonder how much the crash of the Belgian F-16 will affect A) the Belgian offer (do they have enough planes to replace the two and B) the Czech decision, as it seems that the crash record of the F-16 doesn’t look very good.

    a) Belgium has dozens of cocooned F-16.
    b) Even with the 2 last crashed F-16, I doubt that the F-16 has a bad record .

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2694010
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Phil Foster
    PilotGHT can I borrow your brain please I’m going to build an idiot.:D ?

    😀
    😀
    😀

    BTW pilotight, IIRC, the navy will get rafale F3 only and not F2, so even in 2008, the difference shouldn’t important.

    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Re: lol

    Originally posted by mike currill
    I’m sorry, but the impression I get of France and the French is ably demonstrated by one thing:
    The best infantry France has had since Napoleon’s time was 80% foreigners and not allowed to fight on French soil.

    Could you elaborate please ?

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2694038
    glitter
    Participant

    Originally posted by Steve Touchdown
    Mr. André Dulait, president, evoked the future maintenance costs of the F2 standard of the Rafale, recalling that that of the F1 standard, already in service in the Navy, appeared appreciably higher than the initial estimates.

    Does he point the problem ??
    According to what I read, the only main ermaining problem with the F1 is a weakness with the “connectique” ie the aggregate of wires + connections with electronic systems.
    Since these systems are made in a very small scale, it takes much times to debug and is very expensive.

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2694057
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Re: Re: Re: LOL

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT
    un general de l’armée de l’air a dis dans une interview a la commission de senat qu’ils avaient reçu 5 rafales F2 au CEAM le moi dernier! alors ils viennent d’ou, de mars?

    Perhaps you’ve got problems with maths.
    According to your link
    “L’année 2004 sera marquée par l’arrivée des cinq premiers Rafale au standard F2”
    The problem is figures 2003 or 2004 aren’t the same year.
    In 2003, no rafales have been built.
    In french
    La chaine de production était fermée, pas de rafales, t’est bouché ou quoi ???

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT

    saint dizier en aura 10 en 2005 et un squadron operationel decembre 2005!
    http://www.senat.fr/rap/a03-076-7/a03-076-76.html

    Your link can’t back up your claims sorry.
    It say that 5 rafale F2 will be built but not in waht software standard or when the AdA will be allowed to get them in service.

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT

    Stevetw@t un vrais Mythomane!

    un VRAI mythomane
    You’ve got some troubles with french ?

    in reply to: Singapore defers fighter decision #2694188
    glitter
    Participant

    Re: Re: LOL

    Originally posted by PILOTGHT

    anyway to remind you the real facts, and not your own fantasy, it’s hard to deliver a batch of 28 rafales from feb 2004 to 2006 and haven’t any production lines working,

    and you really believe that it’s the same production line who built 10 rafales over 5 years who would be used for the 28 following rafale from 2004 to 2006 ?

    Steve is right, the production line has been shutdown to upgrade that line.
    Could you remind me how many rafales have been built in 2003 ?
    The last rafale is the C101.
    What can you find in the FAQ of fr.rec.aviation ?
    http://faq.bigip.mine.nu:8008/guide/rafale.php

    Février 2002 : début d’assemblage final du C101, premier monoplace de série pour l’Armée de l’Air.

    And here
    http://www.isoshop.com/dae/dae/gauche/sponsors/sponsor_rafale/img/fox3_5.pdf
    received by the AdA the 16th April 2003.
    Thanks god, that wasn’t 2 weeks earlier.

    So, it seems that , if less than 3 months of tests are need, you can easily said that Dassault, trough pure willpower and skilled manpower, manage to built … one rafale.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,351 through 1,365 (of 1,376 total)